Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Pratheeb Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.O.P.No.8204 of 2026 Ajay Pratheeb, S/o. Krishnan, No.3/544, 3rd Cross Street, Lakshmana Perumal Koil Street, Kottivakkam, Chennai 600 041. . Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Inspector of Police, [Crime No.20 of 2026] ... Respondent(s) Prayer : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to extend time by 15 days for the petitioner herein to comply with the conditions imposed on him by order dated 01.04.2026 passed in Crl.O.P.No.8204 of 2026. For Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Menon For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend time by 15 days for the petitioner herein to comply with the conditions imposed on him by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.8204 of 2026 by an order dated 01.04.2026.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submittedthat the petitioner is very ill...
Sabari Vs The State Rep. by its, The Sub Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Sabari ..Petitioner Vs The State rep. by its, The Sub Inspector of Police, (Cr.No. 40 of 2026). ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr.No.40 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Cyber Crime Police Station, Krishnagiri. For Petitioner: Mr.C.Sivakumar For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. Page1 of 32. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No SHL To1. The Sub Inspector of Poli...
G.C.Sivaraj Vs Jyothish Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN G.C.Sivaraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Jyothish Kumar2. State Rep by Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch (CCB)-II, Coimbatore City. Crime No.06 of 2026. ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.V.V.KathiresanORDEROrdered SmaG.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.,J.Sma...
Boomiga Vs Vishwaa
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN IN Boomiga ..Petitioner Vs1. Vishwaa2. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, AWPS Pallavaram Police Station, Crime No. 13 of 2026..Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to permit the petitioner to intervene in Bail Petition in Crl O.P. No.10686/2026 pending before this Court. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Saravanan for M/s.Rajendra Law Office LLP For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R2ORDERThe petition to permit the petitioner to intervene in the Bail Petition in Crl.O.P.No.10686 of 2026 is ordered. 30.04.2026 NSL Page1 of 2G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.NSL To1. The Inspector of Police, AWPS Pallavaram Police Station.2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. IN 30-04-2026 Page2 of 2...
Rajajee @ Chitrasu Vs The State Rep By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.8124 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.18164 of 2026M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered for the present. 30.04.2026 bkn Note: The Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K. Murugammal Vs The State rep.by,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN K.Murugammal ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, E-1, Ponneri Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.355 of 2025).2. Kumar ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.M.Velmurugan for Mr.S.KarthikeyanORDEROrdered SmaG.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN.,J.Sma...
S. Perumal Vs The State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN1. S. Perumal2. P. Gautham ..Petitioners Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. Not Known of 2026) ..RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No. Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.J. Ramesh For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that there is no petition enquiry or case is pending against the petitioner, on the file of respondent herein. Page1 of 32. Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No SHL To...
Tmt. Jayashree Muralidharan Vs R. Jeyashree and 10 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Tmt. Jayashree Muralidharan, IAS., The Secretary to Government, Social Welfare and Women Empowerment Department, Previously Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 09. ..Applicant Vs1. R. Jeyashree2. G. Sarguna,3. R. Sathiya Maheswari4. P. Poonguzhali5. C. Poongodi6. S. Gunasekar7. K. Pechiammal8. S.K. Lalitha9. A. ThameemunishaPage1 of 3 10.S. Sangeetha 11.T. Bhuvaneswari ..Respondents For Applicant: Mr. M.Sureshkumar Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal AGP For Respondent: Mr.U.KarunakaranORDERThis petition is filed to dispense with the personal appearance of the applicant/respondent before this Court on 30.04.2026 in Contempt Petition No.233 of 2026.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is ordered as prayed for. (1/2) MSV P...
Tmt. Jayashree Muralidharan, IAS., Vs K.Shanthi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Tmt. Jayashree Muralidharan, IAS., The Secretary to Government, Social Welfare and Women Empowerment Department, Previously Social Welfare and Nutritious Meal Programme Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 09. ..Applicant Vs K.Shanthi ..Respondent For Applicant: Mr. M.Sureshkumar Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal AGP For Respondent: Mr.U.KarunakaranORDERThis petition is filed to dispense with the personal appearance of the applicant/respondent before this Court on 30.04.2026 in Contempt Petition No.4410 of 2025. Page1 of 32. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, this application is ordered as prayed for. (1/2) MSV Page2 of 3T.VINOD KUMAR, J.MSV SUB APPL(OS) No. 559 of 2026 Page3 of 3...
Nadesan vs Vijay Prieethiv
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
CMP.No.17200 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.98747 of 2024R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 and learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. 2.Learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 has no serious objections in allowing the above petition. 3.Despite the receipt of notice, the respondents 4 and 5, neither appeared nor entered appearance through their counsel.4.In light of the above, the above Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 30.04.2026 kas https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »