Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.K.Marimuthu vs E.M.Manickam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL AND M.K.Marimuthu ..Appellant/ Appellant/1st defendant Vs1. E.M.Manickam2. N.Nachimuthu3. P.Seerangammal4. M.Vivekananthan5. D.Sivakami6. M.Karunakaran...Respondents 1 to 6 / Respondents 2 to 7/ Plaintiffs 2 to 77. M.K.Subramanian ... Respondent No.7 / Respondents 2 to 7/ Plaintiffs 2 to 7PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, praying to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated April 3,2001 made in A.S.No.239 of 2000 by the Principal District Judge, Erode confirming the Judgment and Decree dated March 28, 2000 made in OS.No.937 of 1993 of the Principal Sub Judge, Erode. Page1 of 4 For Appellant(s): No appearance. For Respondent(s): R1 to R-6- served NO appearance R7 - (dismissed Vide Court Order Dated: July 25, 2006)JudgmentOn April 21, 2026, this Court has passed the following order: When the matter was listed before this Court on March 18,...
The Divisional Manager Vs Balaji
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
CMP.No.10270 of 2026 in SA SR.No.11056 of 2026R.KALAIMATHI, J.This Petition has been filed to accept the name of the appellant as Generali Central Insurance Co., Ltd., in the cause title of the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered . 28.04.2026 kkd Note : Registry to effect the amendment in the memorandum of appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
E.Chandrababu, Vs Selvi G Maheswari, M.B.A.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and Sub Application (OS) No.539 of 2026 E.Chandrababu, S/o. Elumalai, No. 30, Raja Agraharam 3rd Cross Street, Poonamallee, Chennai - 600 056. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Selvi. G. Maheswari, M.B.A., Commissioner, Poonamallee Municipality, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056. ..Contemnor(s) This Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt ofCourt Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orderof this Court dated 18.12.2024 made in W.P.No.38988 of 2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.E. Ravi Chandran For Contemnor(s): Mr.M.Suresh Kumar, AAG. Asst. by Dr.T.Seenivasan, SGP. Page1 of 7ORDER(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) This Contempt Petition has been filed seeking direction against the respondent / Commissioner, Poonamallee Municipality, for wilful disobedience of an order dated 18.12.2024 in W.P.No.389...
Dhanasekar Jagadeesan Vs THE LAND COMMISSIONER (FAC)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Dhanasekar Jagadeesan S/o. Late S.K.Jagadeesan, No.10, Veerasamy Street, West Mambalam, Chennai 33 ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records of the 1st respondent which culminated in the impugned order dated 29.9.2021 in D1/ RPNo. 8/2021 (L.REF) and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and further direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the revision petition on merits and in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitionerFor Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Gowthamaraj, Government Advocate Page1 of 2 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. SKOrderWhen the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.04.2026, the counsel for the petitioner has given a change of vakalat and thereb...
Fortune Textiles Company Vs The General Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in W.A.No.SR 18830 of 2026 Fortune Textiles Company Rep by its Authorized Signatory M. Shankar Registered Office at No.32, Lakshmipuram Pallipalayam, Erode. Appellant(s) Vs The General Manager Canara Bank Recovery and Legal Section Circle Office, Madurai and 2 others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.M.SanthanaramanORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the application to condone the delay of 22 days in filing the appeal.2. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit, we are inclined to condone the delay.3. Application is allowed.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal and list it for admission. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 28.04.2026 kpl...
The Director of Government Examinations, Vs J.Mariyappan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
C.M.P.No.2970 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.4768 of 2026R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDN.SENTHIL KUMAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 253 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.J.C.Durairaj, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr..J.Prakasam takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [N.S., J.] 28.04.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.K.Nasirudeen Vs The Devarsolai special Grade Town Panchayat
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND M.K.Nasirudeen Door No. 12/ 169-B, Indira Nagar, Pandalur Village and Post, The Nilgiris District 643 233 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Devarsolai special Grade Town Panchayat Rep. by its Executive officer, Devarsolai , The Nilgiris District ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the 1st respondent dated 13.02.2023 in Na.Ka.No. 552/ 2022 and quash the same For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): M/s. K. Tippu Sulthan For R1 Dt 20/03/2023 Mrs.R.Anitha Spl.Gp. For R2OrderWhen the matter was taken up for hearing on 24.04.2026, the counsel for the petitioner has given change of vakalat and filed memo to that effect and therefore, the Registry was directed to remove the name of the counsel for the Page1 of 3 petitioner and further direct...
TamilNadu Housing Board Vs H S Srinivasa Rao
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
C.M.P.No.5431 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.7235 of 2026R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDN.SENTHIL KUMAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 245 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.P.Kumaresan, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.D.R.Arunkumar for the appellant.3. Mr.M.Ravi takes notice for the 1strespondent. Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents 2 and 3. They have no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [N.S., J.] 28.04.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
C.SELVI Vs Rajkumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
inC.M.A SR. No.25554 of 2025 AND This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 136 days in filing the appeal. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it had been stated that after obtaining the certified copy of the decree, steps were taken to file the appeal, but there was a delay in generating the Court fee. 3.Notice had been directed to the respondents. The learned counsel had entered appearance on behalf of the 3rd respondent. The 1st and 2nd respondents had remained ex parte even before the trial Court. 4.At any rate, to provide opportunity to the appellants herein, to advance arguments on all arguable points, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder.(C.V.K., J.) (K.R.S., J.) smv AND smv in CMA SR. No.25554 of 2025...
G.GNANASEKARAN Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE G.Gnanasekaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs5. Chinnaswamy ..Respondent(s)Directing the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the Revision petition dated 26.12.2025 and remainder dated 02.02.2026 within time framed fixed by this honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Yogaraj For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R4 Page1 of 4OrderLearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No VGA Page2 of 4 To Page3 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA Page4 of 4...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »