Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
DR. R.BRINDHA, I.A.S., Vs T.Tamilarasi and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Dr. R.Brindha, I.A.S., District Collector and The President of Salem District, Anti -TB Association, Salem ..Applicant Vs1. T.Tamilarasi Junior Assistant-cum-Typist, District Anti T.B. Association of Salem, No.9, 1st Floor, Kanchi Nagar, Seelnaickenpatty By-Pass, Salem.2.Dr.Asha Frederick Additional Director of Medical and Rural Health Services (TM) and State Anti T.B. Association of Tamil Nadu, No.359/361, Anna Salai, P.B. No.6227, Chennai 600 006. 3.R.S.Ganapathy, Deputy Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, (TB) Salem and District T.B. Association, Salem. ..Respondents For Applicant: Mr.E.Sundaram, GA Page1 of 3ORDERThis petition is filed to dispense with the personal appearance of the applicant/respondent before this Court on 24.04.2026 in Contempt Petition No.1090 of 2026.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in supportof this application, ...
Manikandan Vs The State The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.7917 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.98294 of 2026M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered for the present. 30.04.2026 bkn Note: The Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Prabhudas Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.8126 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.26393 of 2026M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 90 days in preferring the above criminal appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 90 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.04.2026 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal appeal, if it is, otherwise inorder.bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
KVN Productions LLP Vs D.Uma Shankar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
Crl.MP.No.8185 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.10019 of 2026G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed to permit the petitioner to intervene in Crl.OP.No.10019 of 2026.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. 30.04.2026 lok (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Al Faire Leather Exports Private Limited Vs M/s. ICICI Bank Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.7909 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.15485 of 2026M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered for the present. 30.04.2026 bkn Note: The Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Snehal Subash Joshi Vs The State Rep by its Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Snehal Subash Joshi ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep by its Inspector of Police, (Crime No. Unknown of 2026) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in the event of her arrest in Crime No. Not Known of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.Praveen S Purohit For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. Page1 of 32. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No SHL To1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Publi...
Settu Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.8127 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.24902 of 2026M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 16 days in filing the above criminal appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 16 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.04.2026 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal appeal, if it is, otherwise inorder.bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Chettinad Academy of Research and Education Vs State Level Environment ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and Chettinad Academy of Research and Education Established and running Chettinad Institute of Medical Sciences, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, Sivaramakrishnan Hariharan ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the Minutes of Meeting of the 1 st respondent dated 26.03.2026 passed in respect of the petitioners application vide Application No. SIA/ TN/ INFRA2/ 1st respondent herein to issue Environmental Clearance in favour of the petitioner forthwith. For Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sriram Senior Counsel for Mr.Vaibhav R. Venkatesh For Respondents : Mr.K. SrinivasamurthyORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. He has ...
Harish Bhandari Vs The State Rep by its Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Harish Bhandari ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep by its Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 99 of 2026) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 484 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 99 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner: Mr.D.G.Hariprasath For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. Page1 of 32. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No SHL To1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Public Prosecutor High ...
Mallika Ammal Vs The Commissioner of HR and CE
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.11402 of 2026 in WA SR No.52423 of 2025 Mallika Ammal No.100/88E Lawrence Road Walker Shoe Mart, Thiruppapuliyur Cuddalore 607 002 : PetitionerVs 1.The Commissioner of HR and CE Nungambakkam Chennai 34. 2.The Executive Officer Arulmighu Padaleeswarar Devasthanam Thiruppapuliyur, Cuddalore 607 002. 3.The Joint Commissioner of HR and CE Villupuram. : Respondents Prayer : To condone the delay of 371 days in representation of the entire papers in WA.SR.No. 52423/2025. For Petitioner : Ms.G.DeviORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant.2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 371 days in re-presenting the appeal papers.3. Taking into consideration the cause shown, we are inclined to condone the delay.4. The application is allowed.5. L...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »