Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Mala Vs P.Murugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP.No.10823 of 2026 in CMA.SR.No.66970 of 2026R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 85 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 29.04.2026 nvi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Vignesh Ramasamy Vs Gokulakrishnan T.R
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI IN CRP NO. 1227 OF 20261. Vignesh Ramasamy S/O. Ramasamy, No.7, Aura Elos, Appellant(s) Vs1. Gokulakrishnan T.RS/O. T.Rajendran, No.6, Aura Elios, 2.The Municipal Commissioner Thiruverkadu Municipality Sivan Kovil Road, Thambusamy Nagar, Thiruverkadu - 077. Respondent(s) PRAYER To advance the hearing in CRP (PD) No.1227 of 2026 on the file of this Honble Court from 29.06.2026 to an earlier date as may be fixed by this Honble Court, at the convenience of this Honble Court and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper and thus render justice.For Appellant(s): MR.R. KARTHIK FOR M/S.R.K.Law Firm For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Asharf Khan For R1 R2 - No AppearanceORDEROrdered as prayed for. Post the CRP No. 1227 of 2026 on 02.06.2026. pbl Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl AND CMP NO. 6086 OF 2...
Hari Krishnan @ Hari Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.04.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAHari Krishnan @ Hari ... Petitioner Vs. State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Tank Factory Police Station, Avadi City, Tiruvallur District. (Crime No.89 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying to relax the bail condition 7(b) the petitioner shall sign before the respondent police daily twice at 10.30 a.m and 5.30 p.m for a period of 60 days and thereafter, as and when required for investigation in Crl.O.P.No.7574 of 2026 dated 25.03.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Tamilselvan For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to relax the bail condition 7(b) as per which the petitioner shall sign before theA.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.respondent police daily twice at 10.30 a.m and 5.30 p.m for a period of 60 days ...
Dulraj S Rathod Vs Hemant Raj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE OP No. 448 of 2021 Hemant Raj ..Petitioner Vs Dulraj Rathod ..Respondent Prayer: Original Petition filed under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 r/w. Order XXI Rules 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules, praying to grant the petitioner permanent custody of his minor son H.Prabodh, born on 01.04.2007 and presently aged 14 years. For Petitioner : Ms.S.P.Arthi For Respondent : Ms.Sneha Tiwari1. Dulraj S Rathod2. Susheela D ..Petitioners Vs Hemant Raj ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Original Petition filed under Sections 3, 7 to 10 and 29 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 r/w. Order XXI Rules 2 and 3 of the OriginalSide Rules, praying that the said Dulraj S.Rathod and Susheela D. may be appointed as the guardian of the person and properties of the above-named minor, H.Prabodh and that the petitioners be permitted to handle properties more fully stated in the schedule on behalf ...
G.Manjula Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Prison
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
2026:MHC:1669IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN G.Manjula W/o Gurubalan, No.4/78, South Street, Main Road, Amur, Villupuram 607 209. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Vellore Range, Vellore 632 002. Cuddalore 607004. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ petition filed under article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records No.RO/VLR/669/2025-CAMP(A) dated 08.09.2025 passed by respondent No.1 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant 28 days ordinary leave to the petitioners husband namely Gurubalan, S/o Appavu, aged 46 years, PID No.2153, Convict Prisoner, now confined in the Central Prison, Cuddalore.For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) Mr.P.Pugalenthi, learn...
Muthukannu Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
Crl.M.P.No.7746 of 2026 and Crl.A.SR.No.23817 of 2026Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andSUNDER MOHAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.S.Raja Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor accepts notice for the respondent and having regard to the reasons set out in the condonation petition, does not very seriously object to the delay.2. Hence, and having regard tothe reasons set out in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 222 days in filing the Criminal Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [S.M, J.] 29.04.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sarfaraz Hussain Vs State rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Sarfaraz Hussain ..Petitioner Vs State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.Unknown of 2026 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.NOT KNOWN of 2026 on the file of the respondent police pending investigation. For Petitioner: Mr.Rajesh For Respondent: Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 115, 117(2), 75(2) and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), in Crime No. Not known of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that petition enquiry Page1 of 4 in CSR number is pending against the petitioner.3. In such circumstances...
M/s.Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., Vs M/s.Ad Bureau Advertising P ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and Crl.R.C.No.1636 of 20231. M/s.Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., Rep By Its Authorised Signatory, J.Murali Manohar, No.1, Wallace Lane, 1st Floor, Mataji Complex, Mount Road, Chennai.2. J.Murali Manohar S/o.Krishnaswamy Jayabalan, No.59, Vijayaraghavan road, T.Nagar, AA17, 3rd Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai-600 040. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rep By Mr.Abirchand Nahar, Rayala Towers, 781, Mount Road, Chennai 600002 ..Respondent(s) To extend the time by 6 weeks to comply with the condition imposed byorder dated 27.02.2026 in Crl.MP.No.4038 of 2026 in Crl.RC.No.1636 of 2023for making balance payment of Rs.77,00,000/- (Rupees Seventy Seven lakhs only) and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Saikrishnan For Respondent(s): Mr.Abirchand Nahar, Party-in-person Page1 of 4ORDERConsidering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petiti...
V.SULOCHANA Vs The Director of Rural Development
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and WMP.Nos.574 of 2020 & 3350 of 2021 V.Sulochana ... Petitioner vs Cuddalore District. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the impugned charge memo of the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.PA1/11191/2018 dated 09.10.2019 and quash the same.For Petitioner : Mr.A.R.Nixon For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hazan Fizal Additional Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.Speaking order / Non-speaking orderIndex : Yes / No ...
Sri.V.Chidambara Barathi vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-28-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Sri.V.Chidambara Barathi ..Petitioner(s) Vs Corporation Limited, Gd Naidu Towers, Huzur Road, Gopalapuram, Coimbatore- 641 018. Corporation Limited, Tiruppur Branch, Tiic Building , Kumar Nagar, Avinashi Road, Tiruppur- 641 603. ..Respondent(s) Calling for records pertaining to the impugned communication pertaining to Public E-Auction sale of assets of M/s. Vaanavil Dyeings to be Page1 of 4held on 3.12.2025 bearing TIIC/ TPR/ LAO/ 2025- 26 dated 17.11.2025 issuedby the 5th respondent herein and quash the same as arbitrary illegal and unconstitutional WP No. 4577 of 2025 Calling for records pertaining to impugned order bearing TIIC / TPR/ LAO/ 2024- 25 dated 02.12.2024, passed by the 5th Respondent herein and consequential communication bearing TIIC/ TPR / LAO/ 2024- 25 dated 23.01.2025, issued by the 5th Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 5th Respondent to is...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »