Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd Vs NISHAD T
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Chola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 represented by its Authorised Signatory ..Applicant Vs Nishad T S/o.Thajudeen, Nishad Manzil, Thevanpara, Tholicode PO Mele Tholicode Trivandrum, Kerala 695 541. ..RespondentApplication filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Sections 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint employee of the Applicant viz., Mr.Jithin Babu, Legal Executive, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondents men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary. For Applicant: Mr.D...
The New India Assurance Company Limited vs Kannemma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP.No.22139 of 2024 in CMA.SR.No.13764 of 2024R.KALAIMATHI, J.Heard.2. This Civil Miscellaneous Petition, which is filed to condone the delay of 74 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is ordered. 29.04.2026 nvi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sujatha Manoharan Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
2026:MHC:1671IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Sujatha Manoharan W/o.Manoharan No.5 Mari Street, Muthamizil Nagar, Tiruniravur ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner of Police The Commissioner of Police Office of the Avadi City Police Commissioner HVF Estate, Bhaktavatsala Puram Avadi, Chennai 600 0542. The Deputy Commissioner of Police Office of the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Avadi Chennai - 600 0813. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Narayanasamy AvenueTiruninravur,4. The Inspector of Police (Law and Order) T-11 Tiruninravur Police Station, Tiruninravur -5. Vetrivel S/o.Jayapal No.178, Tank Street Kandiyankuppam Vanapuram Tiruvannamalai - 606 753 ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writ, order or direct...
Gunalan Vs The State Rep Bu Its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
Crl.M.P.No.7745 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.21714 of 2026M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered. 29.04.2026 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. pvs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Abirami Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
Crl.M.P.No.7768 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.SR.No.21938 of 2026M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.Dispense with ordered. 29.04.2026 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. pvs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Murugan Vs State represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Murugan, S/o.Perumal ..Petitioner Vs State represented. by The Inspector of Police, Harur All Women Police Station, (Crime No.03 of 2026) ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Crime No.03 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Sasikumar For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Govt Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERPetition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.03 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 5(1)(j)(ii) read with Section 6(1) of POCSO Act, 2012, is on board for consideration. Page1 of 42. The learned counsel for the petitioner, pleading innocence on the partof the petitioner, who has been in incarceration since 09.02.2026 and false implication in the case, seeks indulgence of this Court. He fur...
Jivithesh Raaj Vs State rep.by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR1. Jivithesh Raaj2. A.Sudarshan3. V.Rohith4. K.N.Ahmed Shaik Fahad5. Vinodh ..Petitioner(s) Vs2. Shibi Ravilla..Respondent(s) Prayer:- This Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, pleased to amend the year of the Sessions Case as S.C.No.128 of 2026 instead of S.C.No.128 of 2023 wherever it occurs and direct the registry to carry out the necessary amendments in the order passed by this Court in Crl.Op.No.5081 of 2026 dated 27.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.R.Malarvannan For Respondent(s): M/S. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor For R1ORDERThis petition is filed to amend the year of the Sessions Case as S.C.No.128 of 2026 instead of S.C.No.128 of 2023 wherever it occurs and to direct the registry to carry out the necessary amendments in the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.5081 of 2026 dated 27.03.2026. Page1 of 2M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.2.This petition i...
Mukesh Singh Rao Vs State rep by The inspector of police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Mukesh ...Petitioner -Vs- State Rep. By Inspector of Police, Crime No.47 of 2023 ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to extend time period imposed in the order in For Petitioner : Mr.Gokulvisvas C.R For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.ataORDERThis petition is filed to extend time period imposed in the order in2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police.3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on eitherside, this petition is ordered and the petitioner is granted two weeks time to comply with the order dated 30.12.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.35665 of 2025. It is made clear that no further extension of time will be granted. 29.04.2026 cda To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Publi...
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
Crl.MP.No.7705 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.22738 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 86 days for filing Criminal Revision against the order dated 04.06.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.4198 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Poonamallee.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.3. Satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition stands allowed.4. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision case, if the papers are otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 29.04.2026 sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
Crl.MP.No.7707 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.22739 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 86 days for filing Criminal Revision against the order dated 04.06.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.4199 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate I, Poonamallee.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.3. Satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition stands allowed.4. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision case, if the papers are otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 29.04.2026 sma https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »