Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 29 2026

Sampangi Vs The Assistant Executive Engineer

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the First day of June Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ SAMPANGI [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, [ RESPONDENTS ] 2 M/S.SANTHOSH CONSTRUCTIONS REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR VASANTHA HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.28/141, VATTARAVALARCHI COLONY, KRISHNAGIRI MAIN ROAD, DHARMAPURI TALUK AND DISTRICT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to stay the operation of the impugned order in proceedings, Ka. En. Uu. Se. Po / Ee. Pa / Bagalur / Ko. Minthiruttu / No. 645-1 / 21-22, Dated 28.01.22 on the file of the 1st respondent [IN WMP.No.12807/2022] pending disposal of the above WP.No.13596/2022Order : This Miscellaneous petition coming on this day forhearing upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S....


Apr 29 2026

Hari @ Harikrishnan Vs The State Rep By its,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Hari @ Harikrishnan ..Petitioner Vs1. The State Rep by its, The Inspector of Police, Tambaram City Cr.No.280 of 20222. The Additional Superintendent of Police Central Prison, Salem ..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.280 of 2022 on the file of 1st Respondent Police and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. L. Sinthan For Respondents: Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 32. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Neutral Citation: Yes/No AT To: 1.The Inspector of Police, Tamb...


Apr 29 2026

Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd Vs URMILA S

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited Chola Crest, C 54 and 55, Super B-4, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032 represented by its Authorised Signatory ..Applicant Vs Urmila S W/o.Shashikant Singh, Baruva Ajgain, Unnao Ajgain, Lucknow Road, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh 209 831. ..RespondentApplication filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Sections 9(1)(ii)(a)(b)(d) & (e) of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 praying to appoint employee of the Applicant viz., Mr.Sachin Mishra, Area Receivables Manager, as Receiver to seize and take possession of the vehicle which is morefully described in the schedule to the Judges Summons which is lying in the custody of respondent or respondents men, agents, servants from respondent premises or wherever found with Police aid and break open of premises if necessary. For Applic...


Apr 29 2026

N.Tamilselvi vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Dr.N.Tamilselvi W/o.P.Elangovan No.24, MIG 2nd Cross Street Nolambur, Chennai 600 037 Appellant Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Respondents PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.31202 of 2025, dated 27.01.2026. For Appellant: Mrs.A.Karthika For Respondents: Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for R1 Mr.D.Veerasekaran Standing Counsel for R2 to R4JUDGMENT(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to workout the remedy in accordance with law.2. In view of the above, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) ...


Apr 29 2026

Y. Simiyon vs the Special Officer/

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

C.M.P.No.10050 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No.74069 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by R. SURESH KUMAR, J.) This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 18 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondents and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. (R.S.K., J.) (N.S., J.) 29.04.2026 vji https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Apr 29 2026

MR Y.PONDURAI ALIAS LEGEND SARAVANAN Vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited a ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and O.A.Nos.295 and 296 of 2026 Mr Y.Pondurai Alias Legend Saravanan Represented by its Power Of Attorney , Mr.T.Stanly, Having office at No.129, North Usman Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 ..Plaintiff Vs1. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Bharat Sanchar Bhavan, Harish Chandra Mathur Lane, Janpath, New Delhi-110 0012. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd 5th Floor, Mahanagar Doorsanchar Sadan, 9, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 0033. Bharati Airtel Limited Bharati Crescent, 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, Phase II, New Delhi 110 0704. Vodafone Idea Limited Formerly Idea Cellular Limited Suman Tower, Plot no 18, Sector 11, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382 0105. Tikona Digital Networks Private Limited 3A, 3th Floor, Corpora, L B S Marg, Bhandup West, Mumbai 400 0786. You Broadband And Cable India Limited Plot No 54, Marol Co operative Industrial Estate, Makwana, Andheri East, Mumba...


Apr 29 2026

R.K.Ayyappan vs the Principal Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN R.K.Ayyappan Son of Krishnamoorthy Plot No.2 Lavanya Apartments No.2 Gangai Amman Kovil Street Lakshmi Puram, Thiruvanmiyur Chennai 600041. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department Government of Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector Thiruvarur District Thiruvarur.3. The Commissioner Thiruthuraipoondi Municipality Municipality Office, Thiruthuraipoondi Thiruvarur District. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to cancel the tender No. CTN.41678654 dated 04.09.2025 and not to encroach land lying in front of S.No.158 and 161 owned by Highway Department by considering the petitioners representation dated 20.01.2...


Apr 29 2026

Anitha vs Karunakaran

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

CMP No. 11222 of 2026 in C.R.P S.R No. 58873 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Ordered as prayed for. 29.04.2026 pbl Note: Registry is directed to number this petition and list the case on 30.04.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Apr 29 2026

Mina Jalandar Pakhare Vs The Superintendent of Prison,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN W.P. (Crl.) No.806 of 2026 Mrs. Mina Jalandar Pakhare, W/o. Jalandar Damu Pakhare, Aged about 54 years, Temporarily residing at No.29, Karpagam Garden, 1st Main Road, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. .. Petitioner vs Chennai. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1 st respondent to forthwith shift the detenu, named Kailas Jalinder Pakhare, to a reputed private multi-speciality hospital for providing proper and continuous medical treatment, at the cost of the petitioner, and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.M.G.Martin Manivannan for Mr.K.Anandha Raja For Respondents : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Read this order in continuation of and in conjunction with earlie...


Apr 29 2026

PAVITHRA Vs C.Arulananthu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 972 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.3. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent has no serious objection to allowing the application.4. The petitioner would aver that, due to the death of her husband in a roadtraffic accident that took place on 01.07.2022, she had to take care of her minor daughters and meet the day-to-day expenses of the family. She would further aver that, owing to financial constraints, a delay of 972 days has occurred in preferring the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.5. Accepting the averments made by the petitioner in the affidavit enclosedwith the petition, this Court is inclined to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Petition subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 972 days alone shall stand waived. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. nvi Page No.1 / 2 nvi...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial