Chennai Orders Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashwanth R T Vs Sonia Patil
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and A.No.5999 of 2024 Ashwanth R T ..Petitioner Vs Sonia Patil ..RespondentPrayer: Original Petition is filed under Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 r/w. Order XXI, Rules 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules r/w. Clause 17 of the Letters Patent, seeking to appoint the Petitioner as the guardian of person of the minor child Viihaan Ashwath Thotta and to pass an order granting the petitioner permanent custody of the child Viihaan Ashwanth Thotta. For Petitioner : Mrs.B.Mahalakshmi for M/s.Sudha RamalingamFor Respondent : Mrs.P.Veena Suresh (1836/2002)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Original Petition stating that the petitioner wants to withdraw this Original Petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect. Page1 of 32. Acco...
Sundari Subramanian and Another Vs V. SENTHIL NAYAKI
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE1. Sundari Subramanian2. Mathivanan Elangovan ..Petitioners Vs V. Senthil Nayaki ..Respondent/ Biological Mother (Impleaded as per order dated 03.07.2024 inA.No.1118 of 2024 and time extended as per orderdated 18.07.2024)Prayer: This Original Petition is filed under Section 56(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (2 of 2016) r/w. Regulations 51 and 55 of the Adoption Regulations, praying that the above named child Sharavanan, S/o.Mathivanan Elangovan (Male, DOB 19.03.2006) may be pleased to be given in Adoption to her and be declared as the parent of the child of the said minor child for all purposes allowed by the law and the birth certificate issuing authority Health Officer, Corporation of Chennai, may be pleased to issue Birth Certificate for the said child Sharavanan, S/o.Mathivanan Elangovan (Male, 19.03.2006) within five working days from th...
Rekha Balar Vs Employees State Insurance
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.04.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and Rekha Balar Proprietor M/s. Citadel Soft Service Solution, Apartment No.T.901 Ananda Phase, North Town Estate, Door No.4,5,6,7 Stephenson Road, Perambur, Chennai-600 012 ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writs of Certiorarified Mandamus directed by the Respondent to considered and dispose the impugned order after verification and quash the impugned order herein Ref. No.5100157844001001/CP/727757 dated 19.02.2026 received on 09.03.2026 lastly respondent on 25.02.2026 by passing necessary or suitable order direction to respondent by passing order for full and final payment made payment order in ESI insurance Corporation , Chennai to respondent and the petitioner mentioned in the above said affidavit by Rekha Balar of Tamil Nadu Central Government within stipulated timeFor Petitioner : Mr...
Malliga Vs The Secretary To The Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
2026:MHC:1680IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Malliga W/o Andi, East Street, Puliyampatti Village, Thandrampet Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs Chennai 600009. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other Writ or Order in the nature of Writ Page1 of 4 call for the records in Connection with the order of Detention passed by the second respondent 04.03.2026 in D.O.No.13/2026-C2 against the petitioner son, Vijayakumar, male aged 28 years, S/o Andi who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the Honourable Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) ...
Kamatchi Vs The Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
2026:MHC:1683IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Kamatchi W/o. Elumalai, No.1060, Pillaiyar Kovil Street, Pudurchekadi Village, Thandrampet Taluk, ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issued a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ or Order in the nature of writ call for the records in connection with the order of Detention passed by the second respondent 04-03-2026 in D.O./12/2026-C6 against the Petitioner Page1 of 4 brother, Venkatesan, Male aged 39 years S/o. Harikrishnan who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the Honorable Court and set him at Liberty. For Petitioner(s): Mr. D. Balaji For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester JohnOrder(Order of the Court was made by D...
Jayanthi Vs The State Represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR1. Jayanthi2. Kamaladevi ..Petitioners Vs1. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore District. (Crime No.146 of 2025)2. A. Gnanasathya ..RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.146 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. A. Ramesh For Respondent(s): Mr. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.146 of 2025 on the file of the 1st respondent police.2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1 strespondent submitted that the investigation has been completed and the charge Page1 of 3 sheet has been filed in C.C.No.323 of 2025 before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Chidambaram.3. In view of the above, this C...
Christiana Sargunam Vs M/s.Bajaj Promotors Pvt Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP No. 9759 of 2026 in C.R.P S.R No. 50162 of 2026T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.Ordered as prayed for. 29.04.2026 pbl Note: Registry is directed to number this petition and list the case on 30.04.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.N.Meenakshi Sundaram, Vs The Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
CMP.No.11088/2026 in CRP.SR.No.120170/2026N.MALA, J.The above petition is filed to condone the delay of 119 days in representing the above Civil Revision Petition 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials placed on record. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is ordered and the delay of 119 days in representing the revision, is condoned. 4.Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition if the papers are otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. 29.04.2026 AP Internet: Yes https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Krithika Valantina Vs Raja Lakshmanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE Krithika Valantina ..Petitioner Vs Raja Lakshmanan ..Respondent Prayer: Original Petition is filed under Sections 3, 7 to 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 r/w. Order XXI, Rules 2 and 3 of the Original Side Rules and Clause 17 of Letters Patent seeking to declare the Petitioner as the Guardian of the person of the minor child Ananya Raja aged twelve years. For Petitioner : Ms. D.Latha For Respondent(s): Ms. V.S.UsharaniORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Original Petition as the dispute has been settled between the parties. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Accordingly, this Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No SRM Page1 of 2DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.SRM Page2 of 2...
Mohanambal Vs Chellammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 29.04.2026Coram:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Mohanambal W/o. Govindasamy Permabalur, ...PetitionerVersus1.Chellammal (Died) W/o. Natesan Pillai 2.Muthiah Pillai (Died) 3.Dhanabal (Died) 4.Ponmalar 5.Umesh (Died) 6.Kannagambujam All are residing at Stamp Vendor Street, ...Respondents Prayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act praying to condone the delay of 718 days in filing the restoration petition in S.A.No.562 of 2004 with respect of Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 5 which was dismissal on 12.01.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sathish Kumar for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents 4 & 6 : Ms.A.Nilaphar for Ms.R.MeenalORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 718 days in filing the restoration petition seeking to restore S.A.No.562 of 2004 which was dismissed as against the Respondents 1, 2, 3 & ...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »