Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kannan Kathirvel Vs Sanjay
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHYKannan Kathirvel ... Petitioner Vs Dindigul District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against Contemnor/ 3rd Respondent in the main writ petition for his willful disobedience and willful violation of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.5913 of 2025 dated 30.06.2025 and punish the Contemnor/ 3rd respondents for the contempt committed by them.For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Ramasiva For R-1 : Mr.T.Amjadkhan Government Advocate For R-2 : Mr.T.Asai Thambi Advocate CommissionerORDERToday, it is reported that the septic tanks have been shifted to the front side of each house. However, the petitioner has again complained that the water would be let into the soak pit would pollute the petitioners well and other neighbouring lands.2. This Court is not inclined to entertain such a plea in the contemptpetition, since t...
Gandhimathi Vs Akilandeswari,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.497 OF 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Gandhimathi ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Ms.Akilandeswari, President(Incharge), Kumbakonam-612 001. ... Contemnor / Respondent No.3 Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for the deliberate and willful disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P. (MD)No.18459 of 2019 dated 12.12.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohideen Basha For Respondent : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar, Special Government Pleader. 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.497 OF 2024ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To: The President(Incharge), Kumbakonam-612 001. 3 CONT.P.(MD)NO.497 OF 2024G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.PMU...
S.Neelakandan Vs Abhay Kumar Singh IPS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CONT P(MD)No.504 of 2026 S.Neelakandan ... Petitioner Vs. Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnors/respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 3715 of 2025 dated 28.04.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERToday, when this contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that only pursuant to the order of this Court dated 28.04.2025 passed in W.P.(MD)No.3715 of 2025, now, permission has been granted and FIR has also been registered and therefore, nothing survives in this petition.2. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. ogy Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. NC...
Pitchaikannu Vs Ganeshwaran,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
1 CONT.P.(MD)NO.502 OF 2024 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Pitchaikannu ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Mr.Ganeshwaran, Tahsildar,2. Mr.Vijayakumar, Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Vadaseri,3. Mr.Ragunathan, Block Development Officer, Thanjavur District. ... Contmenors / RespondentsPrayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors / respondents for their willful, deliberate disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.15638 of 2022 dated 17.10.2023. 2 CONT.P.(MD)NO.502 OF 2024 For Petitioner : Mr.P.Edin Brough For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate.ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To:1. The Tahsildar,2. The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Vadaseri,3. The Block Developm...
KALIMUTHU Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL1. Kalimuthu2. Murugan3. Pandeewarai ...Petitioner/Accused Vs3. Dhanalakshmi(R3 suo motu impleaded as per the order of this court dated 25.02.2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.G.R.Balakumar For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy Government Advocate(Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 99 OF 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (P D B J) 27.03.2026 aav To 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL, J aavORDERIN CRL OP(MD) No. 6008 of 2026...
S.Dhanasekaran Vs I.Vetrivel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR in CMA(MD)SR No.8854 of 2026 S.Dhanasekaran : Petitioner Vs 1.I.Vetrivel 2.M/s.National Insurance Co.Ltd., rep.by its Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Door No.3, North Veli Street, Madurai 625 001. : Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.A.Theethar This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24(3) of Tamil Nadu Motor Accident Case Tribunal Rules 1989 r/w Section 151 of C.P.C., to exempt the petitioner from paying the Court fee of Rs.4,273/- (Court fee paid Rs.100/- exemption sought for Rs.4,273/-)ORDERThe above petition has been filed seeking orders to exempt the petitioner from paying the Court fee of Rs.4,273/- (Court fee paid Rs.100/- exemption sought for Rs.4,273/-) 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3.It is not in dispute that the claim petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the Tribunal.4. Being satisfied with the reasons stat...
Sathiyamoorthi, Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 27/03/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Sathiyamoorthi ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, AWPS-Samayanallur, In Cr. No. 8 of 2026.. ... Respondent PRAYER :-For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 8 of 2026 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.Karthigaivel For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, Additional Public Prosecutor The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 27.03.2026 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To1. The Inspector of Police,Awps-Samayanallur, 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL,J PNM IN CRL OP(MD) No.4167 of 2026 Date : 27/03/2026...
P.Dhanabal Vs V.Saravanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR in P.Dhanabal ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs1. V.Saravanan, The Managing Director,2. Bama,The Administrator, Chennai-600 002. ... Contemnors/Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors/respondents for having wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Curt passed in W.P.(MD).No.27679 of 2025 dated 08.10.2025 and for having committed contempt of Court and pass such other or further orders.For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sumitha For Respondents : Mr.K.Ramaiah Standing Counsel For R1 : Mr.S.C.Herold Singh Standing Counsel For R2ORDERThe instant contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of theorder of this Court dated 08.10.2025 made in W.P(MD)No.27679 of 2025.2. The learned Counsels appearing on either side submitted that the orderof this Court has been complied with.3. Recording the ...
Raja Vs Pandi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Raja ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. Madurai City. ... Contemnors PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors / respondents to punish him for the wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in WP(MD)No.24310 of 2024 dated 17.10.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Mohamed Ibrahim For Respondent : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Nos.1 and 2 Additional Government PleaderORDERThis contempt petition has been filed that the order of this court dated 17.10.2024 passed in WP(MD)No.24310 of 2024 has not been complied with. 2.When this contempt petition has been taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on either side submits that the order of this court dated 17.10.2024 has been complied with. 3.Recording the above submission, this Contempt Petition stands closed. DSK To Madurai City.B.PUGALENDHI,J.DSK...
Branch Manager, Vs Amutha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.2710 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)No.935 of 2024K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking an order for substituted service of notice on the sixth respondent by way of paper publication in 'Malai Murasu' Tamil daily newspaper having circulation in Pudukottai Edition. 2.Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 5. Records perused.3. Considering the reasons stated in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the sixth respondent by paper publication in Tamil Daily viz., Malai Malar, in Pudukottai Edition, indicating the date of hearing as 27.04.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 17.04.2026.4. Post the matter on 27.04.2026. das 27.03.2026 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »