Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Hariprasad Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR T.Hariprasad Petitioner Vs1. The Managing DirectorTamil Nadu Tea Plantation Corporation Ltd, TANTEA, Coonoor, The Nilgiris 643101. 2.The Divisional Manager, Tamil Nadu Tea Plantation, Pandiar Tea Division, Assistant Manager, Range No.V, Plantation, Coonoor Division, RespondentsPRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the record of the impugned proceeding vide No.E/ 1086, dated 19.09.2020 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondent herein to promote the petitioner in the cadre of Asst. Manager as I am fully eligible and entitled to be promoted in the cadre of Asst. Manager basing on the strict service seniority under the law in force.For Petitioner: Mr.G.Thangavel For Respondents Mr.P.Raghunathan for 1 & 2: M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co No appearance for R3 T. VINOD KUMAR...
Mrs.Kanmani vs Kalaimani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
W.M.P.No.17535 of 2024 in W.P.No.10325 of 2024 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J., and K.SURENDER, J., (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed to implead the proposed petitioner as 6th respondent in the writ petition, is ordered as prayed for.2. Registry is directed to carry out necessary and consequential amendments in the case file. [S.M.S, J.,] [K.S, J.,] 27.03.2026 (1/2) mk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sekar vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Sekar ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By Its Secretary, Fort St. George, Chennai 09.3. The Revenue Divisional Officer. Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District. ..Respondent(s)Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the compensation along with the interest in accordance with dated 26/11/2021 in LAOP.No.102/ 2001 on the file of Sub Court, Thiruvannamalai. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondent(s) : Mr.C.GowthamarajORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would submit that the award has already been Page1 of 3 passed on 09.02.2024. Hence, the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication.2. Recording the aforesaid submissi...
Mathavan.M Vs Securities and Exchange Board of India,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 19015 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 18338 OF 2022,WMP NO. 18335 OF 2022,WP NO. 19021 OF 2022,WMP NO. 18339 OF 2022,WMP NO. 18336 OF 2022 Mathavan M. K.Usilampatti, Chathireddiyapatti, Virudhunagar- 626 001. Petitioner in W.P.No.19015 of 2022 Jikki M. K.Usilampatti, Chathireddiyapatti, Virudhunagar- 626 001. Petitioner in W.P.No.19021 of 2022 Vs 1.Securities and Exchange Board of India, Rep by its Chairperson, Plot No.C4- A, G Block, Bandra- Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai- 400051. 2.Reserve Bank of India, Rep.by the Regional Director, Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai, Chennai- 600 001. 3.The Registrar of Companies, Southern Region, Block No.6, B Wing, 2nd Floor, Shastri Bhawan 26, Haddows Road, Chennai- 600 034. 4.Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank Ltd, Rep by its Manager, No.57, Victoria Extension Road, Thoothukudi- 628 002. Respondents in both W.PsPRAYER in W.P.No.19015 of 2022:-Writ Petition...
M/s. Alamelu Srinivasa Ventures LLP., Vs Mr. Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, IAS ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR M/s. Alamelu Srinivasa Ventures LLP., PAN:ABVFA5091K, Registered office at No.15(1), Kumarananthapuram, East Extension, 4th Street, Tiruppur-641 602. Duly represented by its Authorized partner Mr.P.Ramamoorthy S/o.(late) R.Palanisamy, Residing at No.12 and 13, 60 Feet Road, Kumarananthapuram, Tiruppur-641 602. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority cum Inspector General of Registration, ..Respondent(s)PRAYER:Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent/1st respondent as per law for having willfully disobeyed the order of this Court made in W.A.No. 10 of 2024 dated 21.12.2023 For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Krishna For Respondent (s): Mr.U.Baranidharan, Spl Government Pleader Page1 of 3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The copy of the order dated 17.03...
Prakash Arts Pvt Ltd., Vs M/s.IT Expressway Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 21698 OF 2022 M/s.Prakash Arts Pvt Ltd., rep. by its Authorised Signatory, 2-6, 473/1, Street No.5, Himayatha Nagar, Hyderabad-500 029. Petitioner(s) Vs Rep. by its Chief General Manager, Sindur Panthion Plaza, 2nd Floor, No.346, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008. Respondent(s)PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioners representations dated 10.07.2020, 09.06.2022, 21.06.2022, 12.07.2022 and 13.07.2022 and hold an enquiry in accordance with the principles of natural justice and provide the petitioner with an opportunity of personal hearing and pass suitable orders after giving due consideration to the terms of the Concession Agreement dated 27.06.2013.For Petitioner: Mr.P.Wilson Topaz for M/s.A.S.Kailasam and Associates For Respondent(s...
S.Alamelu Vs The Senior Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY AND WMP NO. 21119 OF 2022 S.Alamelu, W/o. Sundararajan, No.16, Angalamman Koil Street, Periyakalapet, Puducherry 605 014. Petitioner(s) Vs UCO Bank, Rep. by its Chief Manager, Periyakalapet Branch, No.1, Bungalow Street, Periyakalapet, Puducherry 605 014. Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to of the Respondent bank, registered on 18.12.2012 to the petitioner and to execute a receipt of discharge of Memorandum of deposit of title deed dated 17.12.2012 registered on 18/12/2012 (Doc. No. 5665 /2012 ) in favour of the For Petitioner(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.R.ChandramohanORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents to of the respondent bank, registered on 18.12.2012 to the petitioner and to execute a receipt of discha...
N.Srinivasan vs P.V.Jayashree
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI N.Srinivasan S/o. T.S.Narayanaswami, No.2/1, Boat Club 1st Avenue, Chennai - 600 028. ..Petitioner(s) Vs P.V.Jayashree Villa B/C, BBCL Sandshore, MGR Salai, Thiruvanmiyur Post, Sholinganallur District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to strike off the OP.No.316 of 2025, on the file of the Sub Court at Alandur, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.P.Arthi For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Anandan for M/s.Majestic Law FirmORDERWhen the matter was taken up for consideration, it is represented by both the counsel that the matter was settled between the parties at Hon'ble Apex Court to that effect order also produced. As per the settlement arrived between the parties and the order of the Hon'ble Apex Court, the revision petition Page1 of 3 pending before this Court does not survive, therefore, becomes infructuous.2. In vie...
S.Karthick, Vs S.Vijayalakshmi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU S.Karthick ...Petitioner Vs. S.Vijayalakshmi ...Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for disobeying the order of A.No.131 of 2025 in GWOP.No.669 of 2024 passed by this Court dated 19.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.V.V.Sairam For Respondent : Mrs.Viajaylakshmi Mr.K.RajarathnamORDERThis Contempt Petition had been filed alleging violation of orders of this Court dated 19.03.2025. Originally by order dated 20.02.2025 this Court had granted visitation rights on the first and third Saturday of every month between 10.00 am to 12.00 pm. Page1 of 42. The matter was again taken up for hearing on the request of the learnedcounsel for the petitioner indicating that the child is only brought at 11.30 a.m., and that the respondent had been interfering in the visitation. To resolve the issue, this Court had directed the ...
P.V.Ramgopal vs the Member Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY1. P.V.Ramgopal2. P.V. Rohit3. P.V.Sangeetha ..Petitioner(s) Vs., Special Deputy Collector (LA), 2nd Floor West Wing, CMDA, Egmore, ..Respondent(s)Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India directing the 1st respondent to issue No Objection Certificate enabling the petitioners to alienate or encumber the land measuring about 3600 Sq.ft comprised in Old Survey No.58/1A and 58/17 New Survey Nos.30 and 31, Block 58, Ward 001, Koyembedu Village, Aminjikarai Taluk, Chennai.For Petitioner(s) : Mr.V.R.Mukunda Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGPORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Page1 of 4 petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Considering the submission coupled with an endorsement made by ...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »