Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
SHANMUGANATHAN Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Shanmuganathan ...Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No. not known of 2026 ) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (PDBJ) 30.03.2026 apd TO 1.Inspector of Police,2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P.DHANABAL,J apdORDERIN...
Thirupathi Vs S.Saravanan IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Thirupathi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr.S.Saravanan, IAS, The District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul. 2.The Tahsildar, Dindigul West Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The Block Development Officer, Reddiyarchathiram Panchayath Union, Dindigul District. ... Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors/first, second and third respondents and punish them for the willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.16880 of 2023 dated 12.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Harish Page No. 1 of 3 For Respondents : Mr.M.Lingadurai Special Government PleaderORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the matter has been considered and orders have been passed. A copy of th...
Petchimuthu Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Vk Puram
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 30/03/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL in Crl.OP(MD) No.2260 of 2026 Petchimuthu ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Vk Puram Police Station, Crime No.53 of 2026. ... Respondent PRAYER :- This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition to the petitioner to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m, in Crl.OP(MD)No. 2260 of 2026 dated 05.02.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balasubramanian For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this Court in Crl OP.(MD). No.2260 of 2026 dated 05.02.2026. 2.Heard both sides. 3.Considering the nature of offence, the fact that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and completion of investigation in this case, this Court is inclined to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in toto. 4.Accordingly, ...
Narayanaswamy, Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps- ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in CRL A(MD) NO.690 of 2024 Narayanaswamy Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Awps-Rural, Palani, Dindigul District. Crime No. 2 of 2023.Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Sundarapandian For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Prakash, Government Advocate Prayer: To relax the condition imposed to report before the Inspector of Police, Dharapuram Town Police Station on the 1st and 15th day of every month at 10.30 a.m., till the disposal of the appeal in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.9383 of 2025 in Crl.A.(MD). No. 690/24.ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.9383 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD).No.690 of 2024, dated 18.07.2025.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.3. In view of the above, the condition imposed on th...
Gomathiammal (Died), D. Muthalagu Ramachandran Nadar (Died), 1. Gandhi ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN in C.R.P.(MD)No.864 of 2026 Gomathiammal (Died) D.Muthalagu Ramachandran Nadar (Died) 1.Gandhimathi 2.Vijayalakshmi 3.Dhanalakshmi 4.Lakshmi Prabavathi 5.M.R.Nagarajan 6.Jeevarekha ... Petitioners vs. 1.Ramachandran 2.Manivannan 3.Radhakrishnan 4.Chandrasekar ... RespondentsPRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of Code of Procedure Code, to grant interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property situate in Ayan Punjai S.No.65/8 of an extent of 94 cents and Ayan Punjai S.No.65/10 of an extent of 44 cents totally 1 acre 38 cents situate at Sriparangusanallur Village, Srivaikundam Taluk, Tuticorin District, pending disposal of the above Civil Revision Petition.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivathilakar *****ORDERThe question of granting an injunction in the revision prefer...
M.Sakthiramu Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sempatt ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :30.03.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CRL.O.P(MD)No.6224 of 2026 and CRL.M.P(MD)Nos.6732 and 6734 of 2026 1.M.Sakthiramu 2.P.Manoj Pandi ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 and 2 .Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, through The Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Stati0on, Dindigul District. (Crime No.288 of 2024) ...Ist Respondent/De-jure Complainant 2.Muthulakshmi ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS,2023, praying this Court to call for the records connected with the proceedings in C.C.No.181 of 2024, on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Athoor and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Lenin For Respondent-1 : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe present Petition has been filed by the accused persons in Crime No.288 of 2024, on the file of the first respondent-Police seeking to quash the charge-sheet, wherei...
V.Lakshmi Vs R.Suseela (Died) V.Gnanavel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
C.M.P.(MD) No.4037 of 2026 in C.M.A.(MD)SR.No.76406 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.The above petition has been filed seeking orders to condone the delay of 171 days in representing the appeal, challenging the order passed in Probate.O.P.No.1 of 2015 dated 15.04.2025 on the file of the Principal District Court, Theni.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Considering the reasons assignedand also the quantum of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list it for admission in the usual course. 30.03.2026 csm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Packiaraj Vs C.Shanmugasundari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.6774 and 6776 of 2026 K.Packiaraj .. Petitioner Vs.1. C.Shanmugasundari2. Akilandammal3. Kathiravan4. Kannan 5.Arunmozhi .. RespondentsPrayer: To call for the records pertaining to the D.V.C.No.3 of 2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi and Quash the same as illegal For Petitioner : Mr.K.Althaf SheriffORDERThe present criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused in D.V.C.No.3 of 2025 on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court, Tenkasi, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner has been charged for the offence under Sections 18, 19, 20 and 22 of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, immediatelyafter marriage, the petitioner's wife has left the matrimonial home and after a period of two years, the present complaint has been lodged with false allegation.3. ...
Jayaprakash Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in CRL A(MD) NO. 1165 of 20251. Jayaprakash2. Ajithkumar3. Kamalesh Petitioner(s) Vs1. State of Tamilnadu Rep. by The Deputy Superintendent of Police,2. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police Crime No. 3 of 2021.3. Shanmugavel4. Duraipandi Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.Maharajan V For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Prakash, Government Advocate for R1 & R2 Prayer: To relax the condition imposed in Crl.MP(MD)No.15881 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.1165 of 2025 dated 06.11.2025 on the file of this Court.ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.MP(MD)No.15881 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.1165 of 2025, dated 06.11.2025.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submits that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.3. In view of the above, the condition imposed on the petitioner is mo...
Annarani Vs Jawahar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and Crl.M.P(MD)Nos.6728 and 6730 of 2026 Annarani .. Petitioner - Vs. - Jawahar .. Respondent Prayer :To call for the records in STC No.105/2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram District and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil MuruganORDERThe present criminal original petition has been filed by the petitioner/sole accused in STC No.105/2026 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram District, seeking to quash the charge sheet wherein the petitioner has been charged for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitionerand the defacto complainant are partners in a business and therefore, the provisions of NI Act could not be attracted. According to him, cheque was not issued for a legally enforceable debt.3. Heard the learned co...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »