Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohideen Pitchai, vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA & W.M.P.(MD)No.3187 of 2021 Mohideen Pitchai ... Petitioner Vs. Senkottai, Tenkasi District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the resspondent dt. 17.02.2021 in KU.No. 128-1/2018/A2 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondent from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property in survey No.Tenkasi District. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ananda Kumar for Mr.K.Manickam For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinodh Government AdvocateORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.2. Though in the writ petition, some other suvery number has been given, the impugned order issued by the second responden...
Sheik Meera vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA & W.M.P.(MD)No.3174 of 2021 Sheik Meera ... Petitioner Vs. Senkottai, Tenkasi District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the resspondent dt. 17.02.2021 in KU.No. 128-1/2018/A2 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondent from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property in survey No. 1037situated at Vadakarai Keelpidagai Village, Sengottai Taluk, Tenkasi District. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ananda Kumar for Mr.K.Manickam For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinodh Government AdvocateORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.2. Though in the writ prayer, S.No.1037 is mentioned, the impu...
Abdul Maliq vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Date : 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA & W.M.P.(MD)No.3178 of 2021 Abdul Maliq ... Petitioner Vs. Senkottai, Tenkasi District. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the resspondent dt. 17.02.2021 in KU.No. 128-1/2018/A2 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondent from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property in survey No.Tenkasi District. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ananda Kumar for Mr.K.Manickam For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinodh Government AdvocateORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.2. Though in the writ prayer, there is reference to S.No.1037,Vadakarai, Keelpidagai Village, Senkottai Taluk, the impugned ord...
Arun Swaminathan.Rm vs the Chairperson
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and W.M.P.(MD) No.325 of 2022 RM.Arun Swaminathan ... Petitioner -vs- Chennai. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to appoint the Presiding Officers and Members in respective Vacancies in all the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums based on the representation of the petitioner dated 18.01.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad For Respondents : Mr.D.Sasikumar Additional Government PleaderORDER[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] The prayer sought in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to appoint the Presiding Officers and Members in all the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forums. The said prayer no longer subsists, since the Government has already ma...
K.Raman Vs L.Venkatraman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN in 1.K.Raman 2.K.Govindhan 3.S.Padmavathi 4.K.Sridharan 5.Vedhavalli ... Petitioners Vs. 1.L.Venkatraman, Assistant Commissioner, Trichy Municipal Corporation, Trichy-620 017. 2.Bharath, Deputy Director of Town & Country Planning, DTCP Regional and Local Planning Office, 11, Kazamalai Main Road, Tharmarai Nagar, Kazamala Colony, Trichy-625 023. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to issue notice to the respondents herein for their willful disobedience of the order dated 24.06.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.19522 of 2021 and punish them for contempt. For Petitioners : Mrs.J.Anandhavalli For Respondents : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R1 : M/s.Kishore Ram for M/s.RB Law Associates for R2ORDERThe order passed by this Court has been complied with. The contempt petition is closed. I...
Jeevakumar.V vs the Principal Secretary to Govt. of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR V.Jeevakumar ... Petitioner -vs- Trichy. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to restore all the 22 passenger train services from Trichy to Myladuthurai and other areas at once. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For Respondents : Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan, Standing CounselORDER[Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.2. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. [SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, C.J.] [N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.] NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No To: Trichy. THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE andN.SATHISH KUMAR, J....
Murugan Vs The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in Murugan ...Petitioner Vs The State Rep by its The Inspector of Police, [Crime No.7 of 2019] ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 430(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner by the Special Court for Exclusive trial of POCSO Act Cases, Virudhunagar district at Srivilliputhur by its judgment in SplSC.No.36 of 2019 dated 13.10.2022 and enlarge him on bail pending disposal of the criminal appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jagadeesh Pandian For Respondent : Mr.M.S.Prakash, Government AdvocateORDERWhen this petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Permission is granted. This petition is dismissed as withdrawn. DSK To 1.The Inspector of Police, 2.The Special Court for Exclus...
Anthony Carl Marx, Vs Shriram Finance Ltd,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
C.M.P.(MD).No.2754 of 2026 in Arb.Appeal(MD)SR.No.7236 of 2026V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J.Heard both sides.2. The reason for not filing theappeal in time is the poor health of the petitioner. I am satisfied with the reason. The delay is condoned. 3.M/s.M.Aswini shall serve entire papers in the arbitration proceedings to Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh.4. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.Ananth C.Rajesh, when the matter is listed for admission. 30.03.2026 rm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Nagarajan Vs M/s.Shriram Finance Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and C.M.P.(MD).No.2385 of 2023 1.N.Nagarajan 2.N.Gomathi .. Petitioners/Respondents/ Respondents Vs. M/s.Shriram Finance Ltd., (Formerly known as M/s.Shriram Transport Finance Company Ltd.,) Office at No.296, APS Complex OPP Apple Mall, Karpaham Nagar 11th Street, Alagar Koil Main Road, K.Pudu, Madurai District 625 007 by its authorized representative ... Respondent /Petitioner/Claimant PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to struck off the E.P.No.101 of 2025 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dindigul in Arbitration Case No.KP70 of 2022 and allow the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan for Mr.M.Karthikeyan For Respondent : ---ORDERMr.S.Srinivasa Ragavan, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition with liberty to approach the Executing ...
D.Arockia Vennila Vs The Authorized Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.03.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Tmt.D.Arockia Vennila ... Petitioner -vs-1. The Authorized Officer, Motilal Oswal Towers, Rahimtullah Sayani Road, Opp. Parel Street Depot., Prabhadevi, Mumbai 400 025.2. The Branch Manager, No.2, First floor, 'V' Complex, S.No.92/2B, Door No.6181, Avadi Road, Senneer Kuppam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Chenni 600 056.3. The Branch Manager, No.111, B-Sivalingam Complex, 1st Floor, Kamaraja 1st Street, Pethaniyapuram, By Pass Road, Madurai 625 016. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issuea WRIT OF MANDAMUS, directing the respondents to execute the orderpassed in Crl.MP No.2587/2022 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dindigul and to hand over the physical possession of the schedule of property mentioned in the order, to the petitioner withi...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »