Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax-11 vs M/S Bharat Heavy Electricals
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
2026:MHC:843IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Commissioner of Income Tax - II Tiruchirapalli - 620 001 .. Appellant vs M/s.Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (In respect of the income of M/s. Wagner Biro, Austria) Royalty Section, BHEL Trichy - 620 014 .. Respondent Prayer in TCA No. 378 of 2011: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the 185/Mds/2005. Prayer in TCA No. 379 of 2011: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the 186/Mds/2005. (In Both) For Appellant : Mr.V.Mahalingam Senior Standing Counsel For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan for M/s. Subbaraya Aiyar PadmanabhanDR. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.COMMON JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH,J) Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant / Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue these appeals qua assessment years 1991-92 (in TCA No.378 of 2011) a...
K.V.Shankaran Vs K.M.Raju(Deceased), 1. Mohini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND K.V.Shankaran S/o.Late K.B.Vasudevan, No.1/96, Kodamalai Village, Spring Field Post, Coonoor Taluk, The Nilgiris District ..Appellant(s) Vs K.M.Raju S/o.Mathan, Kodamalai Village, Spring Field Post, Coonoor Taluk, The Nilgiris District ..Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): MR.A.Bobblie For Respondent(s):ORDERI) In C.M.P.No.4200 of 2025: This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 931 days in filing the petition to bring the legal representatives on record in S.A. No.108 of 2025. Page1 of 42. There is no serious objections from the side of the respondents to allow respondents in this regard, the petition in C.M.P. No.4200 of 2025 stands(II) In C.M.P. No.4202 of 2025:This petition has been filed to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of Thiru. K.M. Raju/the respondent in S.A. No.108 of 2025. respondents in this regard, the petition in C.M.P. No.4202 of 2025 sta...
The State Tax Officer Vs Rosvar Steels Pvt. Ltd,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.3848 of 2026 and W.A.SR.No.17882 of 2026Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 96 days in representing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M, J.] [C.K, J.] 27.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.KANAGARAJ Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
WMP.No.8172 of 2026 in W.P.No.7567 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the G.O.(D) No.349 dated 31.10.2025 issued by the first respondent.2. Ordered as prayed for. 27.02.2026 DP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Nishant Ranka Vs State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR IN CRL OP NO. 34426 OF 2025 Nishant Ranka ..Petitioner(s) Vs State by ..Respondent(s) pleased to extend the time to surrender and execute sureties as directed by this Honble Court as directed by the order of this Honble Court dated 06.01.2026 in Crl.O.P.No.34426 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Solomon Francis For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time to surrender and execute the sureties as per the order of this Court in Crl.OP.No. 34426 of 2025 dated 06.01.20260. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to comply the conditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. 27-02-2026 GBI 2/2 To 1.State by 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of...
M. Balamurugan Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. M. Balamurugan2. Rani3. Munusamy ..Petitioner(s) Vs. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Cr.No.16 of 2026. ..Respondent(s)To amend the offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS r/w Section 4 of Women Harasment Act instead of offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act in the above Crl.O.P.No.2439 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Murthy For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in Crl.O.P.No.2439 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026 by including the offence under Sections as 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS r/w Section 4 of Women Harasment Act instead of offence under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) of IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act.Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. In view of the ...
Lavanya Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Lavanya ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police (Crime No. 41 of 2025) ..Respondent(s) To extend the time to execute sureties order passed in Crl.OP.No.31645 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025 connection with Crime No.41 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-5, AWPS Selaiyur Police Station, Chengalpattu. For Petitioner(s): N.Vinayakamoorthy For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time for executing the sureties as per the order of this Court in Crl.OP.No.31645 of 2025 dated 20.11.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petitioner to comply the conditions as ordered by this Court, from the date on which, the order copy made ready. GBI To1. The Inspector of Police 2...
Ravichandran Vs The State Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Ravichandran ..... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore . ... Respondent (Crime No.702 of 2025) For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) **********ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.553 of 2026 on 19.01.2026. Page No.1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.Sma2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission and reasons stated in the affidavit,the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, it is made clear that, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. 27.02.2026 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non Speaking OrderSma To1. The Inspector ...
S.Vetriselvan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WMP No. 7747 & 7749 of 2026 S.Vetriselvan S/o Subbayya Junior Environmental Scientist (Special Grade) O/o Advanced Environmental Laboratory, Tamil nadu Pollution Control Board, No 5 Ramasamy Nagar, Goundampalayam, Coimbatore 641 030 Petitioner(s) Vs The State of Tamil Nadu Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondent: Mr.C.Selvaraj, AGP Ms.Madhuri Dondi Reddy RR2 & 3ORDERIf stay is granted in this case, it will amount virtually allowing the prayer made in the writ petition. Therefore, stay petition is not entertained and the same is dismissed. rli M.DHANDAPANI J. rli To 1.The State of Tamil Nadu 2.Tamil Nadu Pollution control Board Rep by its Chairman, 75 Mount road, guindy, Chennai 600 032 3.Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board Rep by its Member secretary, 75 Mount road, guindy, Chennai 600 032...
Sri Vinayaga Handlers Pvt Ltd vs Proper Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN IN WP NO. 42182 OF 2025 Sri Vinayaga Handlers Pvt Ltd Rep By Its Director 61, Arathoon Road, Royapuram, Chennai- 13. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Proper Officer Royapuram Assessment Circle, Chennai.2. The Assistant CommissionerRoyapuram North Ii, Chennai-3 ..Respondent(s) Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to modify the order dated 18.11.2025 passed in WP.No. 42182 of 2025 by directing the petitioner to deposit 25% only of the two surviving demands, excluding amount already paid and demand already dropped and to pass For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate Page1 of 6ORDERHeard Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, the learned Government Advocate, on behalf of the respondents.2. This petition has been filed for modification of the order dated 18.11.2025 made in W.P.No.42812 of 2025 wherein it is ordered as unde...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »