Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 02 2026

A.Kavitha Vs Kalarani

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR in A.Kavitha ...Petitioner/Petitioner Vs 1.Kalarani, District Educational Officer,2. FR.A.Arularasu, The Correspondent, Pudukottai District. ....Contemnors/Respondents No.2 and 4PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to initiate contempt proceedings against the Contemnors/2nd and 4th Respondent and punish him for the willful disobedience of the order dated 19.06.2018 made in WP(MD)No.12989 of 2018. For Petitioner : M/s.D.Balamurugapandi For Respondent : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R1ORDERThe present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of theorder of this Court dated 19.06.2018 made in W.P(MD)No.12989 of 2018,wherein this Court has directed the authorities to approve the appointment of the petitioner.2. In compliance of the order of this Court, proceedings have been issued on 29.01.2026, appr...


Feb 02 2026

M/s.United India Insurance Co Ltd Vs S.Pandiammal

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

CMP(MD) No.20569 of 2025 in CMA(MD) Sr.No.102842 of 2025G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.ANDR. POORNIMA,J.(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 52 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Thelearned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Feb 02 2026

Sivasubramanian Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Sivasubramanian ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Eral Police Station, Crime No.583 of 2025. (Transferred To) State of Tamilnadu Rep by The Inspector of Police, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Santhanam Rajesh Kumar B, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor For intervenor : Mr.J.David Ganesan PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime no.583 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 26.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No.583 of 2025 on the file of the respondent seeks bail.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing fo...


Feb 02 2026

R.Naveen Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02.02.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY R.Naveen ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, (Crime No.739 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.S.Sundarapandian Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.739 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police. S.SRIMATHY,JORDER : The Court made the following order :-Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions submitted that the petitioner has been detained under Act 14 of 1982.2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after disposal of petition filed under Act 14 of 1982. (S S Y J) 02.02.2026 To1. The Inspector of Police,...


Feb 02 2026

Parvathi Vs Esakkiammal @ Yasodha

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and C.M.P(MD)No.20232 of 2025 Parvathi ... Petitioner/Petitioner/ Defendant Vs. Esakkiammal @ Yasodha ... Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Sub Court, Ambasamudram to number the I.A.No. (Unnumbered) of 2025 in O.S.No.74 of 2010 dated 19.11.2025 on the file of the Sub court, Ambasamudram filed by the petitioner under sections 215 and 379 of BNSS.For Petitioner : Mr.M.MuruganORDERThe learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition and has made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No I...


Feb 02 2026

The District Collector Vs Veeran

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.02.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN in 1.The District Collector Sivagangai District 2.The District Revenue Officer O/o.District Revenue Office 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer O/o.Revenue Divisional Office 4.The Tahsildar Taluk Office Ilayankudi ... Petitioners -vs- Veeran ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 212 days in filing the above writ appeal as against the order dated 04.04.2025, passed in W.P.(MD) No.12210 of 2024.For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.R.A.Ramachandran Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.J.JohnORDER[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 212 days in the filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned Additional Advocate General appea...


Feb 02 2026

The Branch Manager Vs Ramalakshmi

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

CMP(MD) No.20605 of 2025 in CMA(MD) Sr.No.48163 of 2025G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.ANDR. POORNIMA,J.(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 70 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Thelearned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Feb 02 2026

G.Balamurali Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its The Deputy Superin ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE N. MALA CRL OP(MD) NO. 1887 of 20261. G.BalamuraliS/o.Ganapathy Ponnamaravathi Panchayat Union Pudukkottai District. Presently working at SIPCOT Industrial Park Manamadurai Sivagangai District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vigilance and Anti Corruption (Crime No.09/2019) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Ramesh Mahadev Antony Santhosh U S.Eswaran U.Vikrama Pandian O.Naga Jeevan For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, Additional Public Prosecutor Prayer: C-53Q.To call for the records in Crime No.09/2019 on the file of the respondent police and quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper.ORDER1. This petition is filed by the petitioner to quash the FIR in Crime No.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor appearing for the State, on instruct...


Feb 02 2026

P. Nagavalli Vs The Superintendent of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02/02/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY P. Nagavalli ... Petitioner Vs (R3 is Suo Motu Impleaded as Per Order of This Court Dated 17.12.2025 in Wp.Crl(MD).PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action on the petitioners complaint in CSR No.832/2025 dated 26.11.2024 and 28.11.2025 under the criminal law in the light of the dictum laid down by the Honble Supreme Court of India in the case of Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others reported in 204(2) SCC1.For Petitioner : Mr. R.Anand Advocate. For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.A.S. Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) rd For 3 respondent : Mr. V. BalasubramanianThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to take action on the petitioners complaint in CSR No.832/2025 date...


Feb 02 2026

V.Monisha Vs G.M.Ramachandran

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Feb-02-2026

CMP(MD) No.20573 of 2025 in CMA(MD) Sr.No.108055 of 2025G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.ANDR. POORNIMA,J.(Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 46 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Thelearned counsel appearing for the respondents objected to condone the delay. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] 02.02.2026 aav 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial