Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.M.Ragupathi Raja Vs S.Nagarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI in S.M.Ragupathi Raja ... Petitioner / 3rd Respondent Vs. S.Nagarajan, The Commissioner, Municipality Office, Rajapalayam Municipality, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. ... Contemnor / 1st Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent herein for willful disobedience of this Court's order dated 19.12.2023 made in W.P.(MD)No.27611 of 2023. For Petitioner :Mr.K.Sudalaiyandi For Respondent :Mr.N.DilipkumarORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble G.R.Swaminathan J.) The order passed by this Court has been complied with. The Contempt Petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [R.K.M., J.] NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J andR.KALAIMATHI, J.rmi in...
Vijayalakshmi Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02/02/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI Vijayalakshmi ... Petitioner VsCbcid, Tiruchirapalli District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To transfer the investigation of the above said Case in Crime no.10 of 2024 from the file of the 3rd respondent police to CBCID/4th respondent for further investigation by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu J, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)The petitioners seek for quash of the FIR in Crime No.10 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent.2. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that the investigation has been completed and the case was closed as 'Further action dropped' on 01.03.2025. RCS notice was also served on 16.09.2025.3. In view of the submission made by the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the fi...
Vasanthi Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02/02/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI Vasanthi ... Petitioner Vs Kanyakumari. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To withdraw and transfer the investigation in Cr.No.100/2024 on the file of the R2 to the R3. For Petitioner : M/s.Prabha.S, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) The petitioners seek for quash of the FIR in Crime No.100 of 2024 on the file of the first respondent.2. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, would submit that the investigation has been completed and the case was closed as 'Further action dropped'. RCS notice was also served ON 29.06.2025.3. In view of the submission made by the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioners to challenge the final report, by filing a protest petition.02.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No pnn TO Kanyakumari. 4.The Additional Publ...
M.K.Marimuthu(Died) 1. M.Ponnuthai Vs THE JOINT REGISTRAR NO.2
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR M.K.Marimuthu(Died)1. M.Ponnuthai2. M.Manimolian3. M.Sooriaprabhu ... PetitionersVs The Joint Registrar No.2, Office of the Joint Registrar No.2, Madurai Road, Virudhunagar -626 001. ... Respondent PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to dispose the Execution Application unnumberd CR.E.A.3348 of 2018 in E.P.No.19 of 1994 in Chit Fund Case No.88 of 1991 on the file of learned District Munsif Virudhunagar within a time frame fixed by this Court for speedy disposal.For Petitioners : M/s.G.Dhanalakshmi For Respondent : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government AdvocateORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the learned District Munsif, Virudhunagar, to dispose of the Execution Application filed in unnumbered CR.E.A.No.3348 of 2018 in E.P.No.19 of 1994 in Chit Fund Case No.88 of 1991, as early as possible.2. The le...
Pitchaimani Vs M.Pradeep Kumar I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI in Pitchaimani ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.M.Pradeep Kumar The District Collector, 2.Palanivel The Tahsildar, Tiruchirappalli. ... Respondents / Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents / contemnors for willful disobedience to the orders of this Court dated 13.10.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.16923 of 2023 and punish the respondents for contempt. For Petitioner :Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan For Respondents :Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble G.R.Swaminathan J.)In view of the classification of the revenue record as vandi pathai in respect of the subject survey number, we are unable to grant any further relief in this contempt petition. The respondents will however explore the possibility of ensuring that the pet...
The Secretary to Government Vs R.Suresh Kumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1.The Secretary to Government, 2.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, 3.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 4. ..Petitioner(s) Vs R.Suresh Kumar ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed to condone the delay of 187 days in filing the aboveReview Application, which has been filed to stay the operation of the orderdated 11.09.2024 in W.P. (MD) No.26675 of 2019 and allow the Review Application. Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Ahamed Yashmin Parvin Basheer Government Pleader Page2 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGAOrderThis petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 187 days in filing the review application.2.Insofar as the review application is concerned, there cannot be such an inordinate delay. The delay, which the petitioner is seeking to condone, i.e. 187 days, which in the considered view of this Court, is an inordinate delay. The ...
B.Bhuvaneshwari vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR B.Bhuvaneshwari ....Petitioner Vs 2.The Superintending Engineer TEDC/Metro/Mannarpuram Trichy, Trichy District 3.The Executive Engineer (East) Mannarpuram, Trichy District 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer (East) Mannarpuram 5.K.Kurshith Banu ....Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 3 and 4 to forthwith restore the supply of electricity service connection No. 06-222-203-1516 on the building bearing D.No.42, Kajamalai Road, RPF Road, Trichy, Trichy District, within the time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.D.Senthilkumar For Respondents :M/s.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel for R2 & R4ORDERToday when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner su...
S.Saravanan Vs V.P.Jayaseelan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Cont. P(MD)No.1175 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.11119 of 2023 S.Saravanan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.V.P.Jayaseelan, The District Collector, 2.Rajendran, The District Revenue Officer,3.M.Sivakumar The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.Revenue Divisional Office, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 4.Maheswari, The Revenue Tahsildar, O/o.The Revenue Tahsildar, Madurai Road, 5.T.Udhayakumar, The Assistant Director, Survey and Land Records, 6.Sankarapandi, The Village Administrative Officer, O/o.Village Administrative Office, Near Murugan Kovil, Sankaralingapuram Post, Virudhunagar District. ... Contemnors / RespondentsPrayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnor for his willful disobedience to the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.11119 of 2023, dated 04.10.2023. For Petitioner :M...
P.Thangapandian Vs S.Mathesh
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.18080 of 2023 Heard Mr.P.Sivachandran, learned counsel for the Petitioner.2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this CriminalMiscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 982 days in re-presenting the criminal revision case.3. Being satisfied with reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 982 days in re-presenting the above criminal revision petition is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order. gvn gvn in Crl.RC(MD).SR.No.18080 of 2023...
Veeramanikandan Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 02/02/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI Veeramanikandan ... Petitioner Vs Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a direction, directing the first respondent to Transfer the Investigation of Crime No.91/2024 on the file of the 3rd respondent to, 4th respondent or any other investigation agency. For Petitioner : M/s.Austin.V, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) This Criminal Original Petition is filed to issue a direction, directing the first respondent to Transfer the Investigation of Crime No. investigation agency.2. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions, wouldsubmit that the investigation has been completed and a final report has also been filed before the Judicial Magistrate, Srivilliputhur, in S.C.No. 168 of 2024. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.3. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is closed, with libert...