Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narayanan (Died), 1. Muniyammal vs Venkattagiri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
CMP Nos.30572, 30573 and 30574 of 2025 in S.A. No. 649 of 2005V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered. 02.02.2026 jv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Anupam Dalmia vs Rita Bajoria
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 2350 of 2024 and CMP No.12332 of 2024 Anupam Dalmia S/o. Sashi Dalmia, Res. at Majestic Terrace, Muthukumarappa Street, Acrot Road, Saligramam, Chennai - 093. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rita Bajoria D/o. Sreekant Bajoria, G1D, Sunshine Apartments, No.32, West Jones Road, Saidapet, Chennai - 015. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order passed by the Learned Vth Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai in I.A.No.1/2022 in HMOP No.485/2022 dated 22.04.2024. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Ramesh Kumar Chopra For Respondent(s): Ms. K.Bhanumathi Page1 of 3ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the disputes between the parties were already settled, since decree for divorce on mutual consent has been granted by the competent court. Therefore, the prayer as sought for in the civil revision p...
M.Santhi vs the Secretary to Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.Nos.20349 & 20351 of 2025 and 3312 of 2026 M.Santhi ... Petitioner Vs. JEENIS ROAD, SAIDAPET, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT - 636 810. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order dated 30.04.2025 passed by the third respondent in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.9828/2025/X1 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to work in Pennagaram Panchayat Union. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamuhil For Respondents : Mr.P.Balathandayutham for R1 to R3 Special Government Pleader Mr.K.H.Ravikumar for R4ORDERThe petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 30.04.2025 passed by the third respondent in Se.Mu. Na.Ka.No.9828/2025/X1 and quas...
Subbathal (Died) vs Selvi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
CMP.No.15847 of 2025 & SA.SR.No.133993 of 2022T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 848 days in representing this Second Appeal.2. Considering the averments in the affidavit filed along with this petition, this petition is Ordered.3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is directed to serve the typed set to the respondent. 02.02.2026 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Jayanthi vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
2026:MHC:425IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.No.21118 of 2025 1.Jayanthi 2.Chellaponnu 3.Valarmathi 4.Mangaiyarkarasi 5.Krishnaveni 6.Gomathi 7.Rajakumari 8.Gayathri 9.Meenakshi 10.Amudha 11.Parvathi 12.Prema 13.Ananthi 14.Chitarasi 15.Krishnammal 16.Shanthi 17.Kalyani 18.Thavamani 19.Mallika 20.Thaiyalnayaki 21.Shanthi 22.Shanthi 23.Thamayandi 24.Manikandan 25.Thenaruvi 26.Vasantha 27.Usha 28.Suganya 29.Murugesan 30.Valli 31.Premavathi 32.Gomathi 33.Ramachandran ... Petitioners-vs- 1.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2.The Sub-Collector, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 3.The Tahsildar, Chidambaram Taluk, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. 4.Balakrishnan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned ord...
V.Sureshkumar, Vs Thiru. C.Samayamoorthy, I.A.S., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA AND SUB APPL NO. 738 OF 2025,CONT P NO. 3223 OF 2024,CONT P NO. 3293 OF 2024,CONT P NO. 3384 OF 2024, CONT P NO. 3965 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 731 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 734 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 735 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 736 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 737 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 821 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 820 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 743 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 805 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 807 OF 2025,SUB APPL NO. 819 OF 2025,CONT P NO. 2677 OF 2024,CONT P NO. 2703 OF 2024,CONT P NO. 1774 OF 2025,CONT P NO. 3027 OF 2024,CONT P NO. 3199 OF 2024,CONT P NO. 3194 OF 2024,SUB APPL NO. 806 OF 2025,CONT P NO. 3152 OF 2025 V.Sureshkumar, S/o.K.Velandi, No.35/1, Vijayalakshmi Nagar, Gudalor Goundampalayam, Periyanaickenpalayam, Coimbatore-641 020. Petitioner(s) Vs1. C. Samayamoorthy, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Department of Higher Education, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2.Dr. J. P...
Government of Tamil Nadu vs N.Ramachandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
C.M.P.No.19403 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.80642 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDSHAMIM AHMED, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 559 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.R.Neethiperumal, learned Government Advocate for the petitioners.3. Despite notice having been served, and their names and addresses printed in the cause list, none entered appearance for the respondents.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [S.S.A., J.] 02.02.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Rajendiran Vs Teachers Recruitment Board
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR V.Rajendiran ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Teachers Recruitment Board Rep by the Member Secretary,4. Anitha. A (Roll NO. 18LC01007) No. 24, II Cross Street, Samy Pillaithottam, Puducherry - 605008. Page1 of 4 ..Respondent(s)Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of impugned Additional Select List issued by the first respondent with No. Nil dated 04.08.2021 and consequential Appointment Order issued by the third respondent dated 17.08.2021 and to quash the same in respect of the selection and appointment of the fourth respondent in the branch of International Law under MBC category and consequently direct the third respondent to appoint the Petitioner as an Assistant Professor in the branch of International Law on the basis of the select list published by the first respondent dated 14.0...
P.L. Senthil Kumar Vs T. Nandhini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CRP No. 2820 of 2024 and CMP No.14991 of 2024 P.L. Senthil Kumar S/o. Parthasarathy M, New No.42, Old No.278, Muthumariamman Koil Street, 5th Street, Anna Nagar, Chennai 40. ..Petitioner(s) Vs T. Nandhini, D/o. Thangamani, No.67/29, Nattu Subbaraya Street, Mylapore, Chennai 4. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order passed by the Principal Family Judge, Chennai in IA No.1 of 2023 in OP No.1321 of 2023 dated 29.04.2024.For Petitioner(s): Mr. D.Parventhan For Respondent(s): Mr. E.Prabu Page1 of 3ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the civil revision petition is arising out of the order passed by the family court, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner seeking medical test. He further submitted that the main OP itself was already withdrawn by the petitioner ...
K.Balaji Vs The Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR K.Balaji ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent herein, in Na. Ka. No. 0251 / R3 / 2019 dated 02.05.2019 and consequential impugned Revised Provisional Selection List and Certificate Page1 of 4Verification List for Special Teachers (Drawing) for the School Education Department dated 12.10.2021 of the 3rd respondent and quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Special Teacher (Drawing) by awarding the additional Employment Exchange Weightage Mark of 5 to the petitioner forthwith and grant all attendant benefits For Petitioner(s): Mr.R. Rajeshkrishnan For Respondent(s): MR. S. PRABHAKARAN GA FOR R1 AND 2 MR. C.KATHIRAVAN FOR...
- ‹ Prev
- 648
- 649
- 650
- 651
- 652
- 654
- 655
- 656
- 657
- 658
- Next ›
- Last »