Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.SHANKAR Vs State Rep. by The inspector of police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. S.Shankar2. D.Jeeva3. D.Surya4. R.Maniyarasan5. N.Thangadurai6. G.Maruthudurai ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by The inspector of police ..Respondent(s)To grant extension of time by 15 days to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Attur, and also for deposit of Rs.5,000/- each in the above said Crime No.436 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.29674 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Rajakumar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time by 15 days to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Attur, and also for deposit of Rs.5,000/- each in the above said Crime No.436 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.29674 of 2025 dated 21.10.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petit...
The District Manager / the Deputy Collector vs Arulmigu Sri Rajaganapa ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in WP No.671 of 2026 The District Manager / Deputy Collector TASMAC Limited, Kakalur Thiruvallur District (West) Thiruvallur. Petitioner(s) Vs Arulmigu Sri Raja Ganapathi Kudiyiruppor Nala Sangam, Rep by its Secretary P.J.Moorthi No.324/236A Valliyamapuram Karthikeyapuram, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District - 631 209 and 4 others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Balakrishnan For Respondent(s):Mr. A.Bharath Kumar for R1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the prayer seeking extension of time for shifting/ re-locating the Tasmac shop.2. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit,further time of one month is granted to the applicant to re-locate the Tasmac shop. It is made clear that the Tasmac shop shall not be opened and liquor shall not be allowed to be sold till it ...
Ashok Leyland Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
CMP.Nos.4445, 4522 & 4809 of 2026 and CMA.SR.Nos.207460, 207457 & 207461 of 2025Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Dispensed with for the present. [A.S.M, J.] [C.K, J.] 26.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Sakthivel vs Lakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 298 days in representing the above appeal.2. I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition and being satisfied with the reasons therein, this petition is allowed.3. Registry is directed to number and list the above appeal for admission, if it is otherwise in order. pvs pvs...
VIMALRAJ Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Crl.M.P.No.3368 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.10340 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 509 days in filing the above Criminal Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Balaji, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 26.02.2026 dk Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Munusamy (Deceased) and 3 others Vs R.Sundhar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Sub.Application (OS).No.225 of 2026 in Cont.P.DR.No.15917 of 2026S.SOUNTHAR,J.This sub application has been filed to grant leave to the petitioners to file the above contempt petition against the respondent for the disobedience of the direction given in W.P.No.24901 of 2024 on 30.08.2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this sub application, Sub.Application (OS).No.225 of 2026 is ordered. 26.02.2026 dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
C.Ravi Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR C.Ravi ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) To relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on 05.02.2025 at 10.30 am and thereafter, on the dates to be fixed by the learned Magistrate in Crl.M.P.No.462/2025 in Crl.O.P.No.22733 of 2024 dated 21.01.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.V.Ragunathan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.462/2025 in Crl.O.P.No.22733 of 2024 by order dated 21.01.2025, passed by this Court to report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, on 05.02.2025 at 10.30 am and thereafter, on the dates to be fixed by the learned Magistrate.Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that t...
MEGANATHAN Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Meganathan S/o.Karuppu Kodi, No.116/79, Vaniyambadi Main Road, Kodiyur Jolarpettai, Tirupattur District - 635 851. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of the BNSS, to set aside the order dated 30.12.2025 made in Crl.M.P.No.4355 of 2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, at Tirupattur and consequently return the vehicle. For Petitioner(s): Mr.E.Kannadasan for Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe Revision challenges the dismissal of the petitioner's application seeking return of his car bearing Registration No.TN 91 X 0007 that was seized during the course of investigation in Crime No.361 of 2025. Page1 of 3 2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) on instructions submitted that the final order...
GANESA MOORTHY Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRAGanesa Moorthy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State rep., by its, The Superintendent of Police, 2.State rep., by its, The Inspector of Police, Ariyalur District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to direct the 2nd respondent police to file a final report in Crime No. 07 of 2026 dated 07.01.2026 pending on the file of 2nd respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. D. Dayalan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.07 of 2026 pending on the file of the second respondent police.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted ...
Syed Sahubar Ali Sikandar vs the Regional Passport Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.8065 of 2026 in W.P.No.3690 of 2026 P.T.ASHA,J., This petition is filed seeking to permit the petitioner to amend paragraph No.2 and prayer portion of the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.2. Heard both sides. Mr.L.Baskaran,learned Government Advocate appearing for the 2nd respondent has no objection to this petition being allowed. 3.Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.4. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment. 26.02.2026 srn 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »