Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Saro Sriram Vs The State rep by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Saro Sriram2. M.Sudha ... Petitioners Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Chennai. ... RespondentPRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Cr.No.Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mrs.Saritha Sivakumar For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that there is no petition or enquiry is pending as against the petitioner herein.K.RAJASEKAR, J.Vv 2.Recording the same, this criminal original petition is closed. 26.02.2026 Vv To1. The Inspector of Police, Chennai. District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104....
M.Natarajan Vs G.Thangavelu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 196 days in representing the above SA.Sr.No.111134 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in representing the above SA.SR.No.111134 of 2025 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Second Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
Mahadevan Vs The State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Mahadevan ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by Crime No.55 of 2025. ..Respondent(s) To relax the condition imposed in Para No.6(b) order passed in Crl.O.P.No.35322 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.B.ABDUL SAMATH For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.35322 of 2025 by order dated 26.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the POCSO Court on every working day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI r the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.35322 of 2025 byorder dated 26.12.2025, is relaxed and the petitioner is directed to appear beforethe respondent police as and wh...
R.Vanaja vs the Chairman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
in This writ miscellaneous petition has been filed to substitute the petitioner herein being the Legal Heir R.Vanaja in the place of deceased H.Raja in W.P.No.15725 of 2005.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. I have independently gone through the affidavit filed in support of this petition, and I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out sufficient cause and accordingly, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.4. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title of writ petition. jd jd in...
M.MALARKODI Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN M.Malarkodi ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner of Police,Commissioner Office, Deputy Commissioner Office, Salem 636 305. ... Respondents Prayer: This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents to produce the petitioners father namely Jayakumar, aged 60 years before this Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahamani For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran, Addl. Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.M.Karthikeyan *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to produce the petitioners father namely Jayakumar, aged 60 years, before this Court and set him at liberty.2 According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is the only ...
M.Daisy Rani Vs the Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.7179 of 2026 in W.P.No.6614 of 2026M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition is filed to permit the petitioners to join together and file a single writ petition.2. This petition is ordered, subject to payment of separate Court fee. 26.02.2026 kkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sivarupan Vs Union of India Rep.by, The Intelligence Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN & Crl.M.P. No. 3394 of 2026 Sivarupan ..Petitioner Vs. Union of India rep. by The Intelligence Officer, Chennai. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of BNSS to call for the records in C.C.No. 91 of 2020 on the file of the learned I Additional Special Judge, Special Court under NDPS Act, Chennai and set aside the altered charges framed on 07.02.2026 against the petitioner. For Petitioner :: Mr.S. Kasirajan For Respondent :: Mr.N.P. Kumar, Special Public ProsecutorORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this CourtSUNDER MOHAN,J.nv to withdraw the revision and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. In view of the permission sought and endorsement made, the criminal revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26.02.2026 nv To1. The I Additional Spec...
Pidintala Navneet Kumar Reddy Vs Kathyayini Reddy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
C.M.P.Nos.5324 and 5326 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.Nos.28723 and 28724 of 2026S.SOUNTHAR,J.These civil miscellaneous petitions are filed to dispense with the production of certified copy of the petition with docketorder in H.M.O.P.No.551 of 2022 andH.M.O.P.No.610 of 2023 pending on the file of the learned Sub Court, Alandur.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, the dispense with petitions are ordered for the present. 26.02.2026 dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
RAGHU SURIYA Vs State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA1. Raghu Suriya2. Udayadeepan3. Suryakumar4. Dheepak5. Vedhanayagam6. Vinothkumar7. Mohammed Umar8. Richardson9. Sreeman 10.K.S.Abishek 11.Prasanna 12.Mohammed Ashik ..Petitioners Vs1. State rep. by its The Inspector of Police, (Cr.No.843 of 2025)2. Devarajan ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records pending on the file of respondent police namely Sub Inspector of Police, Peelamedu Station in Crime No.843 of 2025 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1 Mr. M.Manoj Prabhakar For R2 Page1 of 4ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effec...
Thamizhzhagan Vs State rep. by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKARThamizhazhagan C/o Kalidhass ... Petitioner Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Puducherry ... Respondent (Cr.No.34 of 2026) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No. 34 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Sumathi Purushothaman For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.01.2026 for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3),, 103 r/w 190 of the BNSS, 2023 in Crime No.34 of 2026 registered on the file of respondent police seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with otheraccused consumed liquor and taken the deceased to a lonely place and attacked the deceased with knife. It ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »