Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
KARTHICK Vs State rep.by the Sub Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.3418 of 2026 Karthick ..Petitioner Vs1. State rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police, (Cr. No.679 of 2025)2. Ravikumar ..RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to quash the FIR in Crime No.679 of 2025 on the filed of F3 Nungambakkam Police Station, Chennai and order to pay compensation to the petitioner, if the case is falsely alleged against the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Abivarthan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1ORDERThe Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.679 of 2025 , pending on the file of the first respondent Police. Page1 of 42. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent Po...
A.Arul Prakash Vs State Rep by Sub Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Arul Prakash ... Petitioners Vs. State Rep. By, Sub Inspector of Police, Salem District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of arrest in Cr.No.60 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sudhakar For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe petitioner herein apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC in Crime No.60 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegations against the petitioner is that the petitioner hereinjoining hands with other accused approached the defacto complainant for purchasing the lorry belongs to him for a sum of Rs.25.50lakhs and paid a sum of Rs.3,00,0...
GOPI Vs The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
4IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26.02.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA1. Gopi2. Rubalosani ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.320 of 2024)2. Anitha ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.57 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Mayiladuthurai and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Kalaikumar For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public ProsecutorORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first respondent submitted that trial has commenced and the case is posted for examination of LW2.2. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seekspermission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also made an endorsement to that effect. He would further seek that...
K.R.Senapathy vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
W.M.P.No.7583 of 2026 in WP.No.6970 of 2026V.LAKSHMI NARAYANAN, J.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This petition is ordered as prayed for and production of the originalimpugned Technical Approval Orderpassed by the 4th respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.399/2021/ Thi.Maa and Layout Approval in Ma.Va/Na.Oo(Thi.Maa) No.86/2021 dated 17.03.2021, is hereby dispensed with for the present. 26.02.2026 (2/3) kkd 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.SHANKAR Vs State Rep. by The inspector of police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. S.Shankar2. D.Jeeva3. D.Surya4. R.Maniyarasan5. N.Thangadurai6. G.Maruthudurai ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by The inspector of police ..Respondent(s)To grant extension of time by 15 days to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Attur, and also for deposit of Rs.5,000/- each in the above said Crime No.436 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.29674 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Rajakumar For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to extend the time by 15 days to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate-I, Attur, and also for deposit of Rs.5,000/- each in the above said Crime No.436 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.29674 of 2025 dated 21.10.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition isordered and time is extended by one week to the petit...
The District Manager / the Deputy Collector vs Arulmigu Sri Rajaganapa ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN in WP No.671 of 2026 The District Manager / Deputy Collector TASMAC Limited, Kakalur Thiruvallur District (West) Thiruvallur. Petitioner(s) Vs Arulmigu Sri Raja Ganapathi Kudiyiruppor Nala Sangam, Rep by its Secretary P.J.Moorthi No.324/236A Valliyamapuram Karthikeyapuram, Tiruttani, Thiruvallur District - 631 209 and 4 others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Balakrishnan For Respondent(s):Mr. A.Bharath Kumar for R1ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on the prayer seeking extension of time for shifting/ re-locating the Tasmac shop.2. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit,further time of one month is granted to the applicant to re-locate the Tasmac shop. It is made clear that the Tasmac shop shall not be opened and liquor shall not be allowed to be sold till it ...
Ashok Leyland Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
CMP.Nos.4445, 4522 & 4809 of 2026 and CMA.SR.Nos.207460, 207457 & 207461 of 2025Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Dispensed with for the present. [A.S.M, J.] [C.K, J.] 26.02.2026 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Sakthivel vs Lakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 298 days in representing the above appeal.2. I have gone through the affidavit filed in support of the petition and being satisfied with the reasons therein, this petition is allowed.3. Registry is directed to number and list the above appeal for admission, if it is otherwise in order. pvs pvs...
VIMALRAJ Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Crl.M.P.No.3368 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.10340 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 509 days in filing the above Criminal Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Balaji, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 26.02.2026 dk Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Munusamy (Deceased) and 3 others Vs R.Sundhar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
Sub.Application (OS).No.225 of 2026 in Cont.P.DR.No.15917 of 2026S.SOUNTHAR,J.This sub application has been filed to grant leave to the petitioners to file the above contempt petition against the respondent for the disobedience of the direction given in W.P.No.24901 of 2024 on 30.08.2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this sub application, Sub.Application (OS).No.225 of 2026 is ordered. 26.02.2026 dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »