Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Uthandi Gounder(Died) vs Lakshmi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.Uthandi Gounder (died) [Sole appellant died. Appellants 2 to 4 are brought on record as LR's of the deceased sole appellant (Uthandi Gounder) vide order of the Court dated 07.02.2024 made in CMP Nos.2945, 2938 & 2943 of 2024 in S.A.No.515 of 2013]2. Rasammal3. Balakrishnan4. Kamadhenu ...Appellant/Appellant/Defendant Vs1. Lakshmi2. Mariammal Respondents1 & 2/Respondents 1 & 2 /Plaintiffs 1& 2 rd rd rd3. Ayyammal ... 3 Respondent/3 Respondent/3 Defendant4. Ramachandran5. Devaraj6. Sakthivel7. Mahendiran ... Respondents/Respondents/(L.Rs Of Deceased LakshmiR2/D2 PRAYER: This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against thejudgement and decree dated 03.09.2012 made in Apeal Suit No.9 of 2011 on thefile of the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Erode, confirming thejudgment and decree dated 30.10.2008, made in O...
Thangavel (Died), Thiyagarajan Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND Thangavel (Died), Thiyagarajan S/o. Late Thangavel, No.15/202 A, Athikadu Street, ..Appellant(s) Vs1. The District Collector2. The Revenue Divisional Officer3. The Sub Collector4. The District Revenue Officer District Revenue Office,5. The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Page1 of 56. Village Administration Officer Village Administrative Office, ..Respondent(s) Thangavel (died) ..Appellant(s) Vs The District Collector ..Respondent(s) To Condone the delay of 485 days in representing the SA. Sr.No.92143 of 2024 and thus render justice. For Appellant(s): Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondent(s):ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 485 days in representing the SA. Sr.No.92143 of 2024. Page2 of 52. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the de...
B.D.V.S. Showroom Vs T.Rajendran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.Nos.5889 & 5894 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.37051 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.Ordered.2. In view of the urgency expressed by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, the Registry is directed to number the Civil Revision Petition, if it is otherwise in order, and list the matter for admission on 02.03.2026. 27.02.2026 dna https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shanmugasundaram Alamelul Vs The Income Tax officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on 24.02.2026Pronounced on 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.13055, 13058 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.44781 of 2025 Shanmugasundaram Alamelu ... Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Non-Corp., Ward 1(1) CHE, Chennai Main Building, No.121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. ... RespondentPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records on the file of the Respondent in impugned Order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1051791040(1) dated 31.03.2023 for the Assessment Year 2016-17 and the consequential impugned Noticeissued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Respondent in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022- Principles of Natural Justice, without jurisdiction, void ab initio. For Petitioner ...
D.Sivakumar Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED and WMP No.15612 of 2022 D.Sivakumar : Petitioner Vs The Management Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore : RespondentPrayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the preliminary award passed by the Additional Labour Court, Coimbatore in Industrial Dispute No.120 of 2019 dated 07.04.2022, quash the same and vitiate the enquiry proceedings conducted against the petitioner For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondents : No appearanceORDERWhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Even the learned counsel for the Respondent is also not present. The matter is of the year 2022. It appears that Page1 of 3 the Petitioner as well as his Counsel has no interest to pursue the m...
The Management of Aruna Theatres Vs K.Paulraj (DECEASED),
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED and WMP No.14746 of 2022 The Management of Aruna Theatres and Enterprises Private Limited Chennai 600 078 Petitioner Vs1. K.Paulraj (DECEASED),2. The Receiver Aruna Theatres and Enterprises Private Limited3. K.Ganesan,4. K.Mariyappan5. M.Vasantha (R3 TO R5 ARE SUBSTITUTED AS LRs OF DECEASED FIRST RESPONDENT VIDEORDER DATED 07.11.2025 MADE INWMP.43193/2025 IN WP.15572/2022 BY HCJ) ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling the entire records pertaining to the passing of impugned order dated 22.04.2022 passed I.D No.193 of 2008 on the file of II Additional Labour Court, Chennai and quash the same Page1 of 4 For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Ms.E.Yuvarani, For R3 To R5 R-1 died, Steps taken R-2 served. No appearanceORDERWhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised c...
N. Anbu vs G. Ravindran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.12210 of 2021 in S.A.No.304 of 2021T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to bring on record the respondents 5 to 7 as the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent as the respondents 5 to 7 in the above Second Appeal.2. Considering the nature ofaverments in the affidavits filed along with these petitions and as the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent has to be brought on record for proper adjudication in the Second Appeal, this petition is Ordered.3. The registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. Notice to the newly impleaded respondents returnable by 22.04.2026. Private notice is also permitted. 27.02.2026 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Superintending Engineer Vs T.Karuppannan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED and WMP No.15192 of 2022 The Superintending Engineer Dharmapuri Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Dharmapuri- 636 705. : Petitioner Vs T.Karuppannan : Respondent Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the Labour Court, Salem in ID No.7 of 2006 and quash its award dated 22.03.2021. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : No appearanceORDERWhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Even the learned counsel for the Respondent is also not present. The matter is of the year 2022. It appears that the Petitioner as well as his Counsel has no interest to pursue the matter any further. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of Prosecution. Interim Page1 of 4order, if any, shall stand vac...
Ayyavu vs Rajenran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.19989 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.68031 of 2025K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/Claimant praying to condone the delay of 950 days in filing the above C.M.A before this Court against theorder dated 18.04.2022 made inM.C.O.P.No.668 of 2017 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special District Judge Court, Erode.2. Mr.S.Senthilkumar, learned counsel appeared on behalf of 2nd Respondent/Insurance Company submitted that he has no objection to this petition being allowed.3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.4. It is made clear that after thenumbering of this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if this Court enhances the compensation which was awarded by the Tribunal, Petitioner/Claimant will not be entitled to get any interest for the default period. 27.02.2026 mrr Note: R...
L. Murugasamy vs R. Kandasamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.Nos.23018, 23019 & 23020 of 2025 in S.A.No.884 of 2022T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 2719 days in filing a petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the fifth respondent, to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the respondents 9 and 10 as the legal representatives of the deceased fifth respondent as the respondents 9 and 10 in the above Second Appeal.2. Considering the nature ofaverments in the affidavits filed along with these petitions and as the legal representatives of the deceased fifth respondent has to be brought on record for proper adjudication in the Second Appeal, these petitions are Ordered.3. The registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment. Notice to the newly impleaded respondents returnable by 22.04.2026. Private notice is also permitted. 27.02.2026 vrc https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »