Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Official Assignee vs S. Arjunlal Sunderdas
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 17.04.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in I.P.No.25 of 2014 The Official Assignee High Court Madras ..Applicant(s) Vs1. S. Arjunlal Sunderdas 23, Anderson Road Nungambakkam Chennai-62. B V Reddy & Sons BV Reddy Colony Chittoor A P 517001 ..Respondent(s)To direct the 2nd respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,21,25,000/- with interest at 18% P.A. from 21.04.2014 till date of realization with cost of the recovery proceedings. For Applicant(s): M/s.K.V.Ananthakrushnan Assisted by M/s.A.Janani For Respondent(s): M/s.Anna Mathew For M/s.Menon Page1 of 5ORDER(Order of the Court was made by K.Kumaresh Babu J.) This matter is listed under the caption For Being Mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the respondents.2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the submissions made, paragraph Nos.3 to 10 shall be replaced with the following paragraphs:3. The respondents had been a...
Sivaji Vs Vaiyapuri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Sivaji, S/o. Ponnusamy, Melakadu, Kuruvapulam, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Vaiyapuri, S/o. Rathinathevar, Melakadu, Kuruvapulam, Vedaranyam Taluk, Nagapattinam Distric. Ramalinga Thevar (Died). ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 07.10.205 made in IA No. 4 of 2024 in OS No. 89 of 2020 on the file of the Learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vedaranyam.For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Mageshkumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.SenthilORDERThis Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court, dismissing the application filed by the petitioner to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 2nd defendant. Page1 of 52. The petitioner herein/ plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No.89 of 2020 forbare injunction against the first ...
R.Seethalakshmi and 2 others Vs Dr.Karthikeyan, IAS., and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH1. R.Seethalakshmi D/o. P.Rathinasamy, Computer Operator,2. B.Radhika, D/o.T.Balan Nair, Computer Operator,3. V.Masilamani, D/o. Vellimuthu, Computer Operator, ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Dr.Karthikeyan, I.A.S., Page1 of 4 ..Contemnor(s)PRAYER: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Respondent for his willful and intentional disobedience to the order of this Court passed in W.P.No. 26642 of 2024 dated 13.09.2024 For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Bala For Contemnor(s): Mr. C. Selvaraj Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.D.R.Arun Kumar Standing Counsel for R2ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation, placed a copy of the proceedings of the first respondent dated 13.02.2026. A copy of the same has also been served on the learned c...
The DGM (T) and Project Director Vs The District Collector And Sole Ar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.5197 of 2026 in Arb Appeal.SR.No.214150 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.KUMARESH BABU, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 457 days in representing the papers in the above appeal. 2.Taking note of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 3.The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.(C.V.K.J., ) (K.B.J., ) 27.02.2026 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.GOPAL (SENIOR CITIZEN), Vs The Chief Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN R.Gopal (Senior Citizen), S/o.Ramalingam, Social Worker and Ground Water Protector, No.4, 2nd Cross, Tagore Nagar, VTC Lawspet P.O, Puducherry 605009Petitioner Vs 1.The Chief Secretary to Government, Puducherry 605 001. 2.The Secretary to Government (Public Works), 3.The District Collector, Puducherry 605 009 4.The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Division, Public Works Department, 5.The Commissioner, Oulgaret Municipality, Puducherry 605005 RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 06.11.2025 and to restore the traditional water body Vannaan Madu in Lawspet, Puducherry to its full original extent as per the Revenue Records and FMB by removing all encroachments and illegal construc...
Bhagavathsingh Vs Gurumurthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Bhagavathsingh S/o. Sekar, Aiyyanar Kovil Street, Thirunaraiyur, Cuddalore District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Gurumurthy The Inspector of Police, ..Contemnor(s) PRAYER: The Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the ordermade in W.P.No. 3007 of 2025 dated 03.03.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. G.Pugazhenthi For Contemnor(s): Mr.V.J.Priyadharsana Government Advocate Page1 of 4ORDERMrs. M. Kalpana, Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Cuddalore, was present at the time of hearing.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that an F.I.R. has been registered by the District Crime Branch, Cuddalore, in Crime No.11 of 2025 on 15.03.2025 for the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of I.P.C.3. In view of th...
The DGM (T) and Project Director, Vs The Arbitrator / District Collect ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
CMP.No.5368 of 2026 in Arb Appeal.SR.No.214162 of 2025C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.andK.KUMARESH BABU, J.(Order of the Court was made by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.) This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 261 days in representing the papers in the above appeal. 2.Taking note of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. 3.The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order.(C.V.K.J., ) (K.B.J., ) 27.02.2026 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Latha Vs R.Radhakrishna, IAS and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR M.Latha S/o.Selvam ... petitioner vs.1. Mr.R.Rathakrishnan Chairman2. Mrs.M.Ambika The Chief Engineer (Personnel)3. Mrs.D.Helena The Chief Engineer Mettur Thermal Power Station-I Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Mettur Dam - 636 406. ... Respondents Page Nos.1/4Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 08.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.30223 of 2018. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deepak Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Anand Gopalan M/s.Advit Law Chambers *****ORDERIn the order dated 08.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.30223 of 2018, which is the subject matter of the contempt petition, a direction was issued to the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioner, if it is pending, in accordance wi...
P. Annakodi, Vs Thiru. B.Chandra Mohan, I.A.S., and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH P.Annakodi, D/o.Palimuthu Petitioner vs1. Thiru B.Chandra Mohan IAS, Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. Thiru. Rameswaranmurugan, Member Secretary, Teachers Recruitment Board, Chennai 600 006.3. Thiru S.Kannappan, Director of School Education, College Road, Chennai 600 006.4. The Commissioner, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Chennai 600 005 Respondents [R4 suo motu impleaded vide order of this Court dated 27.02.2026] PRAYER: Sub Application filed under Section 151 of CPC, to reopen the contempt in Cont.P.NO.61 of 2025 order dated 14.03.2025. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Suneetha For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General assisted by C.Kathiravan, Standing Counsel [R2] Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru, Special Govt. Pleader [R1, R3 & R4] R4- Suo motu impleadedORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, t...
R.Venkatarakrishnan Vs Kanagavalli
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR R.Venkatarakrishnan S/o.Late Ramu ... petitioner vs. Kanagavalli Administrator E-2287, Vakkur Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Limited Vakkur Village & Post Vikiravandi Taluk Villupuram District - 605 501. ... Respondents Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17977 of 2020. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kaviveerappan For Respondents : Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri Government Advocate ***** Page Nos.1/2 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mkORDERToday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the order dated 01.12.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17977 of 2020, which is the subject matter of the present contempt petition has been complied with.2....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »