Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.SIVA KUMARESAN Vs State representation,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN A.Siva Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs. State Represented by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Coimbatore. ... Respondent Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to suspend the sentence passed against the petitioner by the learned Principal Special Court (Special Court for Exclusive trial of Case under POCSO Act), Coimbatore, in Spl.S.C.No.14 of 2022 dated 30.05.2025, pending the appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.R.N.Amarnath For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, APP *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking suspension of sentence imposed against the petitioner by the learned Principal Special Court (Special Court for Exclusive trial of Case under POCSO Act), Coimbatore, in Spl.S.C.No.14 of 2022 dated 30.05.2025, pending ...
Tea Board of India vs the Glenmorgan Tea Estate Company,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN C.M.P.No.29147 of 2025 in W.A.SR No.145487 of 2025 Tea Board of India (Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Dept, of Commerce, Govt of India), Rep. by Deputy Director of Tea Development, Shelwood, Club Road, P.O.Box No. 6, Conoor -643 101, Nilgiirs. Applicant(s) Vs The Glenmorgan Tea Estate Company, Glenmorgan Estate, Glenmorgan P.O. Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, M.Shanmugavel, Ootacamund -643 237, Nilgiris and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.K.Ramanamoorthy For Respondent(s):Mr.Roshan Balasubramanian for R1 Mr.R.T.L.Chandar Senior Panel Counsel for R2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 43 days in filing the appeal.3. Taking into consideratio...
Government of Tamil Nadu vs J Pandi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI CMP No. 28366 of 2025 AND1. Government Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its Secretary, Environment And Forest Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Head of Forest Force), Velachery Main Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032... Petitioners Vs J Pandi S/O.V.Jayaraj, Forest Guard, Anaimalai Tigher Reserve Forest, Udumalaipettai Range, Thiruppur Division, Coimbatore Circle. ..Respondent Prayer in CMP No. 28366 of 2025 : jTo condone the delay of 700 days in filing the above WA against the order dated 04-09-2023 made in WP.No.18360 of 2023. For Appellants : Mr.R.Neethi Perumal Government Advocate For Respondent : Served, no appearanceOrder(Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to condone the delay of 700 days in filing the writ appeal. Pa...
The State of Tamilnadu Represented by Vs V.R.Krishnakumar@Varaaki
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA in Crl.M.P.No.12340 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.31419 of 20241. The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City Police, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.2. The Inspector of Police Gama-4, Land Grabbing Wing-2, Central Crime Branch-1, Vepery, Chennai- 600 007, (Cr.No.182 of 2024)3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Organized Crime Unit-11, Crime Branch CID, Egmore, Chennai. ..Petitioners Vs V.R.Krishnakumar @ Varaaki ..RespondentsCriminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the BNSS, 2023, to extend the time for a period of six months to complete the investigation of the case and to file final report as per direction given by this Court by order dated 25.06.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.12340 of 2025 in Crl.OP.No.31419 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent : Mr.P.Rajkumar PandianPage1 ...
L. SINGARAVELU Vs The Chairman and Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
W.M.P.No.54459 of 2025 in W.P.No.39721 of 2025 W.M.P.No.54459 of 2025 in W.P.No.39721 of 2025D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.This petition is filed to implead the petitioner as the second respondent in the Writ Petition.2. Being satisfied with the reasonsstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Writ Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. The petitioner/proposed respondent is added as the second respondent in the Writ Petition. 29.01.2026 grs Page No.1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Secretary vs a.Babu Prasanth
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI CMP Nos. 1299 and 1301 of 2026 in WA SR Nos. 80073 and 80089 OF 2020 CMP No.1299 of 20261. The Secretary2. The Controller Of Examinations .. Petitioners Vs1. A.Babu Prasanth S/o. Alagarsamy No. 12 / 4 / 41-A, Main Road, South Street, Reddiarpatty, Kannivadi Post, Dindigul 624 7052. S. Selvakumari Headmistress, Chennai Girls Higher Secondary School 2-A, School Road, Perambur, Chennai 600 011. ..Respondents CMP No. 1301 of 20261. The Secretary2. The Controller Of Examinations .. Petitioners Vs1. A.Babu Prasanth S/o. Alagarsamy No. 12 / 4 / 41-A, Main Road, South Street, Reddiarpatty, Kannivadi Post, Dindigul 624 7052. S. Selvakumari Headmistress, Chennai Girls Higher Secondary School 2-A, School Road, Perambur, Chennai 600 011...Respondent(s) Prayer in CMP No. 1299 of 2026 : To condone the delay of 1811 days in representin...
FAZIL AHAMED Vs State Represented by its Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Fazil Ahamed Petitioner Vs The State, Rep. By The Inspector of Police Chennai. RespondentPrayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 praying to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No. 14733 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.1734 of 2025, dated 06.08.2025 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on first Monday of every month at 10.30 am till the filing of the final report and thereafter, the petitioner shall report before the Trial Court on all hearing dates without fail.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thirukkumaran For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate, Criminal Side ----ORDERToday, when the matter came up for hearing, Ms.J.R.Archana, learned Government Advocate, (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions imposed on the petitioner by th...
K.Jayalakshmi vs P.Ravi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in K.Jayalakshmi ...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant Vs.1. P.Ravi2. C.Ananthi3. The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, pleased to permit the petitioner to intervene in Crl.O.P.No.31263 of 2025 on the file of this Court. For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Santhanaraman For R3 : Ms. J.R.Archana, Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDEROrdered sma To1. The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur.2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.K.RAJASEKAR, J.sma in...
V.Jaisankar vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and WMP No. 52480 of 20251. V.Jaisankar Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Its Secretary To Government, Housing And Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. Rep. By Its Member Secretary, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Rep. By Its Managing Director, 485, M.T.B. Building Ii Floor, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035. Board, Tnhb Shopping Complex, Thirumangalam, Chennai-600 101. 6.Tamil Nadu All India Service Housing Association-ii (Taisha-II) Rep. By Its Secretary, Having Its Registered Office Page1 of 3 At Taisha-II Housing Complex, N Block, West Natesan Nagar, Virugambakkam, Chennai-600 092.Prayer : This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 6 to demolish the constructions put up in the Open Space Reserve (OSR) land earmarke...
DURAIKANNU VEERASAKTHI Vs State of Tamilnadu, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.Nos.23498 & 23500 of 2025 Duraikannu Veerasakthi Director, Neo Max Properties Pvt. Ltd., Ricky Towers, 3rd Floor, Subramaniam Pillai Street, S.S.Colony, Madurai 625 106. . Petitioner Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu, The Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, City Special Unit-III, Chennai 600 016. (Crime No.11/AC/2018/CC/II) 2.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Udhagamandalam, Nilgiris Dt. . RespondentsPrayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for the records relating to proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.03 of 2025 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chengalpattu and quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karnan for Mr.R.Chakkaravarthy For Respondents : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERIn conti...
- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »