Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.S.Anandan vs Hemakumari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 06.01.2026PRONOUNCED ON : 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.K.S.Anandan 2.K.A.Ramalingam @ Ramesh ... Petitioners vs. 1.Hemakumari 2.Krishnamoorthy 3.Lakshminarasimhan ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order, dated 02.04.2024 passed in I.A.No.833 of 2016 in O.S.No.180 of 2016 by the District Munsif Judge at Ponneri by allowing the above Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioners : Mr.E.Prabu For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.KrishnasamyORDERThe Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the District Munsif Judge, Ponneri in I.A.No.833 of 2016 in O.S.No.180 of 2016, dated 02.04.2024 granting leave to the respondents 1 and 2/plaintiffs under Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for filing a suit for Specific Performance on same cause of action.2. The respondents 1 and 2 filed a suit...
S.Suresh, Advocate Vs The State Government of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
2026:MHC:369IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and WMP Nos. 21953 to 21955 OF 2017 S.Suresh, Advocate S/o.S.Subburaj, No.12/1, North street, Karumbalai, Madurai ..Petitioner Vs Page1 of 85. T.Mohan, ..Respondent(s) WP No. 21074 of 2017 S.Suresh, Advocate S/o.S.Subburaj, No.12/1, North street, Karumbalai, Madurai ..Petitioner(s) Vs Page2 of 85. A.Ramar ..Respondent(s) WP No. 21075 of 2017 S.Suresh, Advocate S/o.S.Subburaj, No.12/1, North street, Karumbalai, Madurai ..Petitioner(s) Vs Page3 of 85. R.Ramachandran, ..Respondent(s)Prayer in W.P.No.21073 of 2017: PETITION filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Quo Warranto directing the 5th respondent herein to show cause under what Authority the 5th respondent holds the post of Additional Public Prosecutor for Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and oust him from the o...
R.Anburaj Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
C.M.p.No.18446 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.100067 of 2025S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.andC.KUMARAPPAN, J.[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 555 days in preferring the above appeal.2. The delay in filing the appealoccurred on account of the clerical mistake made by the learned counsel in the copy application. That being so, this Court is inclined to consider the present petition. Consequently, the delay of 555 days in preferring the above appeal stand condoned and the petition is ordered. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 29.01.2026 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mangavaram vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by the Additional Chief Secretar ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Mangavaram ... Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.Geroge, Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector and District Magistrate of Villupuram District, Office of the District Collector and District Magistrate, Villupuram, Villupuram District.3. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram, Villupuram District.4. The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.5. The Inspector of Police,Marakkanam Police Station, Villupuram District. ... Respondents Prayer: This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the records relating to the detentionorder in R.C.No.C2/23/2025, dated 28.05.2025 passed by the second respondent underthe Tamil...
M.Govindaraj Vs D.Karthikeyan IAS., and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN M.Govindaraj ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Dr.D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S., Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.J.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., Commissioner, Rippon Building, Chennai 6000 03. 3.Saranya Hari, Deputy Commissioner (Education), Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003. 4.Vasanthi, Education Officer (Education Department), Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003. ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents herein for wilfully disobeying theorder made in W.A.No.1727 of 2018 dated 06.02.2023.For Petitioner : Mr.T.Dharani for Mr.K.Raja For Respondents : Mr.S,Indhubala, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1 Mr.S.Silambanan, Senior Counsel for Mrs.Aswini Devi.K, Standing Counsel for R2 to R4 ********ORDER(Order ...
P.Karthikeyan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN P.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner Vs.1. The District Collector, Namakkal District,2. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Collector,3. The Asst.Engineer, Public Works Department, Rasipuram Circle, Namakkal.4. The President, Minnakkal Panchayat Union & Minnakkal Post, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District.5. The Block Development Officer,6. The Tahsildar,(R5 and R6 suo motu impleaded vide orderdated 22.01.2026 ) .. Respondents Prayer : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to give __________Page 1 of 6 necessary permission /sanction to allow the petitioner to de-silting and clearing blockages in the canal passing my agricultural land in future to allow the smooth flow and natural drainage of water in the canal adjoining the petitioner's land based on his representation da...
JANARTHANAN P.A Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Janarthanan.P.A ...Petitioner Vs. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Crime No.1556 of 2020. ...Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to transfer the investigation in Crime No.1556 of 2020, from the file of the respondent police to any other competent agency. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Tamilselvan For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh, GA(Crl. Side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that though the petitioner has come up with this petition seeking transfer of the investigation in Crime No.1556 of 2020, pending on the file of the respondent police to any other competent agency, the investigation in this case has already been completed and the final report has been filed before the Additional Mahila Court, Tiruvallur by way of e-filing bearing No.LTN2...
Natesan (Died) 1. Manickam vs Kanthasamy (Died), 1.Rathinavel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
CMP No. 26838 of 2025 in SA SR No. 86418 of 2024T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 378 days in payment of the deficit Court fee of Rs.4250/- in Second Appeal SR No. 86418 of 2024.2. Heard and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 378 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 29.01.2026 pbl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The State Rep. by Its Principal Secretary to Government vs K. Mohana M ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
C.M.P.No.22203 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.140383 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 173 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioner State.3. Mr.V.Sivalingam takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [K.G.T., J.] 29.01.2026 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Sumathi Vs Poonguzali
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR S.Sumathi Petitioner Vs Poonguzali Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District. Respondent PRAYER This contempt petition has been filed under section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking to punish the respondent herein for having willfully disobeyed the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.20551 of 2024, dated 26.07.2024 and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner : Mr.A.C.Kumaragurubaran For Respondent: Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl. Government PleaderORDERWhen this contempt petition has been taken up for hearing, Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that pursuant to the order of this court dated 26.07.2024, the application of the petitioner dated 23.10.2017 has been considered and anorder dated 27.01.2026 has...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »