Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.S.Ramalingam(Died) vs P.Sree Ranga Nadar(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D. MARIA CLETE and M.P. No. 1 of 2014 M.S.Ramalingam (died) 2.A.R.Santhiya ...AppellantsVs. P.Sree Ranga Nadar (died) 1.V.G.Ramalakshmi R.Ramakrishnammal (died) 2.M.R.Parimala Nathan 3.M.R.Sathyamoorthy 4.P.Ramathilagam 5.M.S.Rajarathinam 6.M.S.Rajalakshmi 7.M.S.Rajalakshmi 8.M.r.Rangaraja (2nd appellant, R7 & R8 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole appellant M.S.Ramalingam vide court order dated 23.07.2021 made in C.M.P.No.11847 to 11850 of 2019 in S.A.No.433 of 2014 (CSNJ) ...RespondentsPRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree made in A.S.No.69 of 2012 dated 25.02.2013 on the file of the I Additional District Court, Erode in confirming the Judgment and decree made in O.S.No.104 of 1998 on the file of the II Additional Sub Court, Gobichettipalayam dated 28.02.2006. APPEARANCE OF PARTIES: For Appellants : No appear...
J.Premavathi Vs H.Krishnanunni IAS and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and Sub-Application No.560 of 2023 J.Premavathi ...Petitioner Vs. 1.H.Krishnanunni, I.A.S., District Collector, Erode District, Erode. 2.S.Santhoshini Chandra, District Revenue Officer, 3.M.Sathishkumar, Revenue Divisional Officer, 4.P.Jayakumar, Tahsildar, Erode, Erode District. 5.Selvarathinam[5th respondent has been impleaded as per orderdated 29.01.2026 made in Sub-Application No.498 of 2023] ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents herein for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.29384 of 2017 dated 28.06.2022, under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act. For Petitioner : Mr.K.S.Jeyaganeshan For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4 Mr.Premchander.R for R5 (impleaded) **...
Vengatesan vs Deivaraj,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
CMP No. 1726 of 2026 in SA SR No. 81551 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 115 days for paying deficit Court fee Rs.44,535/-.2. Heard and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 112 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 29.01.2026 pbl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Selvarathinam Vs J.Premavathi and 4 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
Sub-A.No.498 of 2023 in Cont.P.No.1446 of 2023S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDC.KUMARAPPAN, J.This sub-application has been filed to implead the applicant/ proposed 5th respondent in the Cont.P.No.1446 of 2023.2. In view of the reasons stated inthe accompanying affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the applicant is impleaded as the 5th respondent in the contempt petition.3. Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the Contempt Petition. (S.M.S., J.) (C.K., J.) 29.01.2026 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.A.Perumal Vs The Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR K.A.Perumal ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records leading to the impugned proceedings of the respondent dated 09.10.2019 in ref: 2019- 20/ESTab and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M/S S.UMA MAHESWARI for Mr.C.Jagadish For Respondent(s): Mr. K. SIDDHARTHORDERMs.S.Umamaheswari, learned counsel representing Mr.C.Jagadish learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the case. Learned counsel further submits that a memo dated 21.01.2026 is filed to the said effect and also made an endorsement on the bundle. Page1 of 32. Recording the memo dated 24.01.2026 and the endorsement made bythe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently connected m...
Amourdalingame Alias Arumugam Vs Balachandar Flore
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL in A.S.No.327 of 2024 Amourdalingame Alias Arumugam S/o. Rattinacavoundin alias Rattaname, 2nd Cross St, Muthaiya Mudaliar St, Thavalakuppam, Pondicherry State -7. ..Appellant(s) Vs1. Balachandar FloreS/o. Late Flore Periasamy, No.10, Rue Jean Charcat, Appt.555, 95100, Argenet, France. Res. at No.14, Subbrayapillai St, Ariyankuppam, Pondicherry - 605 007. Flore Periasamy (Died) rep by LRs D2 to 10, Flore Kanakavalli (Died) represented by her Legal Heirs the plaintiffs No. 3 to 10.2. Bakkiya Leela Flore W/o. Purushothaman, D/o. late. Flore Periasamy, NO.51, Duraisamy Nagar, Annaikuppam, Cuddalore NT - District Page1 of 5 Tamilnadu. Res. at No.14, Subbrayapillai St, Ariyankuppam, Pondicherry - 605 007.3. Djamounarany FloreW/o. Ajagappane, D/o. Late Flore Periasamy, No.1, Allee Boris Viare, 5 eme etage, Appt. 5506, 93380, Pierri Fitte, Fra...
R.Kumar vs the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
WMP.No.29458 of 2025 in WP.No.37889 of 2024M.DHANDAPANI, J.This petition has been filed to amend and incorporate the writ petition prayer.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed.3. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the Writ Petition and post the same in usual course. 29.01.2026 PVS https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Nagarajan, Vs Mr. Gunasekaran and 4 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR K.Nagarajan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Mr. Gunasekaran Managing Director, Villupuram - 605 602.2. Mr. A.Ganapathy, Vellore Region, Rangapuram, Vellore - 632 009.3. Mr. S.Sridhar, Tiruvannamalai Region,4. Mrs. M.Sumathi Samundeeshwari, Assistant Manager (Wages), Page1 of 4 Thiruvannamalai Region,5. Mrs. Bhama, The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporations, Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai 2. ..Contemnor(s)Prayer: This Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Respondents for their willful disobedience and non- compliance of the order and directions of this Hon'ble Court dated 28.10.2024 in W.P.No. 16260 of 2019. For Petitioner(s): M/s.H.Nandhini, For Contemnor(s): T.Chandrasekeran, Special Government PleaderORDERThe present Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the responde...
Janarthanan Vs S.Amirtha Jothi IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Janarthanan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.S.Amirtha Jothi, I.A.S., The District Collector, Chennai District. (Previously Kanchipuram District) 2.Ananda Raj The Assistant Executive Engineer, Highways Department (Building and Maintenance), Tambaram Division, Velacherry, Chennai 600 042. 3.The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur Taluk, Chennai District. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents herein for committing contempt for disobeying the orders of this Court made in W.P.No.24878 of 2017 dated 14.02.2018. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, Spl. Govt. Pleader Amicus Curie : Mr.T.Mohan, Senior CounselORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Contempt Petition has been instituted to punish the respondents for their willfu...
M. Krishnasamy, vs Subbayan and Co
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP.No.29432 of 2025 in WP No.25446 of 2025 1.M.Krishnasamy 2.S.Rathinasamy 3.P.Padmavathi 4.A.Sureshkumar 5.R.Rajamani .. Petitioners Vs.1. Subbayan and Co., Rep.by its Partner S.Sivasakthivel2. The District Collector/ Inspector of Panchayat, District Collectorate, Tiruppur 641 604.3. The Assistant Director of Panchayat, Collectorate, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.4. The Block Development Officer, (Village Panchayats), Pongalur Panchayat Union, Pongalur, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District.5. The Special Officer, V.Vavipalayam Village Panchayat, V.Vavipalayam, Pongalur Panchayat Union, Pongalur, Tiruppur District. __________Page 1 of 66. The District Officer, Town and Country Planning, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. .. Respondents Prayer : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to implead the petitioners as respondents in the above writ petition....
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »