Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 02 2026

The Revenue Divisional Officer Vs S. Paul Sudhagar

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN in W.A.(MD) SR No.95961 of 2025 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Kovilpatti Division Ettayapuram Road Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District-628 501 2.The Tahsildar Vadakku Subramaniyapuram Kayathar Taluk Thoothukudi District-628 952 3.The Firka Surveyor Kayathar Taluk Kovilpatti Revenue Division Thoothkudi District ... Petitioners -vs-S.Paul Sudhagar ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 195 days in filing the above writ appeal as against the order dated 25.03.2025, passed in W.P.(MD) No.8294 of 2025. For Petitioners : Mr.D.Sasikumar Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Annie AbinayaORDER[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 195 days in the filing the above writ app...


Jan 02 2026

K.Palanisamy, Vs Sabiya

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI in K.Palanisamy ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs. Sabiya, 621 306. .. Contemnor/ Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / respondent for wilfully and deliberately disobeying theorder of this court passed in WP(MD)No.19626 of 2023, dated 11.08.2025.For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government PleaderORDERWhen this contempt petition has been taken up for hearing there is no representation for the petitioner. 2.This Court by order dated 11.08.2023 has disposed of WP(MD)No.19626 of 2023 as follows:3. In view of the said submission, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to take a decision on the petitioner's application within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If there is any objection from adjacen...


Jan 02 2026

Selvam Vs Sakthivel

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :02/01/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA Selvam ... Petitioner Vs Sakthivel, ... Respondent Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act pleased to punish the Contemnor for willful disobedience ofimplementing the order of this Court in W.P.(MD).No.26808 of 2024, orderdated 11.11.2024. For Petitioner : M/s.Bharathi S For Respondent : Mr.F.Deepak Special Government PleaderORDERThe learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submits that the order dated 11.11.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.26808 of 2024, has been complied with and handed over the copy of the order passed by the respondent to the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Court today. 2.Recording the submission made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent, this Contempt Petition is closed. In any event, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the order, if he is so aggrieved an...


Jan 02 2026

P.Boopathi Vs The Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi District

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.01.2026CORAM :THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY P.Boopathi ... Petitioner Vs Tenkasi District, Tenkasi. Tenkasi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 26.05.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action against the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Baskar Mathuram, For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and also he made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To Tenkas...


Jan 02 2026

Anto Judi Livintha Vs Dr.P.Senthilkumar, IAS

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

1 CONT.P.(MD)No.3761 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Anto Judi Livintha ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. Dr.P.Senthilkumar,IAS., Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai 600 009. ...Contemnor / 1st Respondent Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor / respondent hereinfor the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 26.06.2023 passed in W.P.(MD)No.15169 of 2023 which is amounting to Contempt of Court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nallathambi For Respondent : Mr.S.Shaji Bino, Special Government Pleader. 2 CONT.P.(MD)No.3761 of 2025ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCS : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To: The Principal Secretary to Government, Chennai 600 ...


Jan 02 2026

Sangeetha Vs Vatcham

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI in Sangeetha ... Petitioner Vs. Virudhunagar District. ... Contemnor PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the Respondent for willful disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.13383 of 2024 dated 21.06.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohammed Bayas Ali For Contemnor : Mr.M.Sidharthan, Addl. Government Pleader.ORDER(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) The learned counsel on either side submitted that the encroachment in question has since been removed. 2.Recording this development, this contempt petition is closed. (G.R.S. J.,) & (R.K.M. J.,) NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To: Virudhunagar District.G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.andR.KALAIMATHI, J.ias in...


Jan 02 2026

M.P.Malathy Vs T.Udhayachandran IAS

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

1 CONT.P.(MD)No.3743 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN P.Malathy ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.1. Mr.T.Udhayachandran,IAS., Secretary to Government,2. Mr.Simranjeeth Singh Kahlom,IAS., District Collector,3. Mr.Shankara Narayanan, District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram District. ...Contemnors / RespondentsPrayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnors / respondents herein for wilful disobedience of the 2 CONT.P.(MD)No.3743 of 2025order of this Court passed in W.P.(MD)No.13777 of 2022 dated13.10.2022 and punish them. For Petitioner : Ms.K.Porkodi Karnan, for M/s.Polex Legal Solutions. For Respondents : Mr.SR.A.Ramachandran, Additional Government Pleader.ORDERIt is reported that the order passed by this Court has since been complied with. In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed. NCS : Yes / No Index :...


Jan 02 2026

Pothumponnu Vs Nagarajan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

Sub.A.(MD).No.536/2025 in Cont.P.(MD).No.SR.104752/2025N.MALA, J.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this Sub Application is ordered. 02.01.2026 AP Internet: Yes https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jan 02 2026

K.S.Ravichandran Vs R.Muthukannu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:02.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR and K.S.Ravichandran ... Petitioner/Petitioner .Vs. Thanjavur District ... Contemnor/Respondent No. PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act,1971 praying this Court to punish theContemnor for the deliberate and wilful disobedience of the orderof this Court made in W.P(MD)N0.20468 of 2025, dated 30.7.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent : Mr.B.Saravanan, Addl.Govt.PleaderORDERThe present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.20468 of 2025, dated 30.7.2025, wherein, this Court has directed the fourth respondent therein to consider the representation of the Petitioner. 2.In compliance with the orders of this Court, the fourth respondent therein has passed orders on 11.12.2025. 3.Recordingthe same, the Contempt Petition stands closed. NCS...


Jan 02 2026

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs Kanyakumari District Centr ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jan-02-2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN in Employees Provident Fund Organisation Regional Office, No.65A Water Tank Road Nagercoil-629 001 Instead of Employees Provident Fund Organization Regional Office, Lady Doak College Road Chokkikulam, Madurai-625 002 Tamil Nadu ... Petitioner -vs- M/s.Kanyakumari District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., rep.by its General Manager Alexandra Press Road Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District Tamilnadu ... RespondentPRAYER: Petition filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to accept the cause title as the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Sub-Regional Office, No.66, Water Tank Road, Nagercoil, as the appellant in the main appeal instead of The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Lady Doak College Road, Chokkikulam, Madu...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial