Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Shanthi vs the Director of Elementary Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.M.P.No.6758 of 2025 R.Shanthi ...Petitioner Vs.Vellore District. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records connected with the Impugned Order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.306/A4/2023, dated 02.04.2024 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to continue to pay the incentive increments granted to the petitioner for Post Graduation Degree and B.Ed., as per G.O.Ms.No.307, School Education Department, dated 15.12.2000.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For Respondents : Ms.Mythreye Chandru, Special Government PleaderORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. ...
I.Leema Vijayam vs the Director of Elementary Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.M.P.No.6766 of 2025 I.Leema Vijayam ...Petitioner Vs.Vellore District. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records connected with the Impugned Order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.306/A4/2023, dated 02.04.2024 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to continue to pay the incentive increments granted to the petitioner for Post Graduation Degree and B.Ed., as per G.O.Ms.No.307, School Education Department, dated 15.12.2000.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For Respondents : Ms.Mythreye Chandru, Special Government PleaderORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bund...
K.Kasi vs the Director of Elementary Education
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.M.P.No.6768 of 2025 K.Kasi ...Petitioner Vs.Vellore District. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records connected with the Impugned Order passed by the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.306/A4/2023, dated 02.04.2024 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to continue to pay the incentive increments granted to the petitioner for Post Graduation Degree and B.Ed., as per G.O.Ms.No.1032, (School Education Department) dated 26.06.1997and G.O.Ms.No.307, School Education Department, dated 15.12.2000. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For Respondents : Ms.Mythreye Chandru, Special Government PleaderORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and he ha...
E.Manogaran vs S.R.Nagendiran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR . JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL & C.M.P.No.5581 of 2020 & 12215 of 20251. Mr.E.Manogaran2. Tmt.L.Nandini ... AppellantsVersusMr.S.R.Nagendiran ... Respondent First Appeal filed under Order 41 of Rule 1 of CPC read with Section 96 against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.235 of 2014 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Thiruvallur District dated 06.09.2019. For Petitioner : Ms.P.Dharseni and Mr.N.Elayaraja For Respondent : Mr.V.M.VenkataramanaJUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) When the matter was listed on 02.01.2026, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal".2. Today, Ms.P.Dharseni, learned counsel for appellants is before this Court, but she is not ready to argue the matter and seeks for an adjournment citing diffic...
Mamtha Srawankumar vs C.Ponnuswamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Mamtha Srawankumar W/o.Srawankumar Petitioning Creditor vs. C.Ponnuswamy Debtor Petition filed under Sections 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of the Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, III of 1909 and Order III-A of the Insolvency Rules, 1958, praying (a) to adjudicate the Debtor as Insolvent;(b) to direct that the estate of the Debtor be vested in the OfficialAssignee of Madras, for the benefit of the General body of creditors of the Debtor; and (c) to order that the costs of this petition paid by the Official Assignee of Madras, from and out of the estate of the Debtor to the Petitioning Creditor. For Petitioning Creditor : Mr.T.Srikanth *****ORDERLearned counsel for petitioning creditor seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.gm Recording the said endorsement, the Insolvency Petition is dismissed a...
B.Pragadeesh vs R.Kandaswamy Gounder
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and C.M.P.Nos.10648 of 2018 & 14633 of 2019 B.Pragadeesh ... Appellant Vs 1.R.Kandaswamy Gounder 2.K.Baladhandapani 3.B.Renugadevi ... Respondents PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of C.P.C., against the fair and decreetal dated 12.12.2017 in I.A.No.114 of 2017 in O.S.No.77 of 2016 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge Court, For Appellant : Mr.C.R.Prasanan For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.ThangavelJUDGMENTWhen the matter came up for hearing on 19.12.2025, the learned counsel for the appellant reported no instructions from his client and sought permission to file a memo to that effect. Accordingly, the Registry was directed to print the name of the appellant in the cause list.2. Today, i.e., on 05.01.2026, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the name of the appellant was printed in the cause list; however, none appeared on behalf of th...
MUNUSAMY Vs Pazhani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 619 days in representing the above second appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, and perused the materials available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the delay is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. The Registry is directed to list the above Second Appeal after numbering the same, if it is otherwise in order. pvs pvs...
Ganesan @ Krishnasamy, Vs Shri. A.Kulothungan, IAS., and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:121IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. Ganesan @ Krishnasamy, Petitioner(s) Vs1. Shri. A.Kulothungan, IAS., Special Secretary (Revenue), DRDM, Government of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry - 605001. 2.Mr. G.Johnson, Deputy Collector (Revenue) - Cum - Land Acquisition Officer, Karaikal. 3.Mr. Shanmuganadam, Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Government of Puducherry, Karaikal, Karaikal District - 609602. Contemnor(s)PRAYER To punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience and breach of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.A.No. 28 of 2018 dated 07.08.2018. For Petitioner(s): M/s. R.NATARAJAN, For Contemnor(s): Mr.R.Sreethar, Additional Government Pleader (puducherry) For Rr1 To 3.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The grievance of the petitioner is that the Deputy Collector Revenue cum Land Acquisition Of...
V.Shanmugavelu, Vs Shri. A.Kulothungan, IAS., and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
2026:MHC:120IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN1. V.Shanmugavelu, Petitioner(s) Vs1. Shri. A.Kulothungan, IAS., Special Secretary (Revenue), DRDM, Government of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry - 605001. 2.Mr. G.Johnson, Deputy Collector (Revenue) -Cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Karaikal. 3.Mr. Shanmuganandam Tahsildar (Land Acquisition) Government of Puducherry, Karaikal, Karaikal District - 609602. Contemnor(s)PRAYER To punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience and breach of the order passed by this Court in W.A.No. 36 of 2018 dated 07.08.2018. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Natarajan For Contemnor(s): Mr.R.Sreedhar, Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry)ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The grievance of the petitioner is that the Deputy Collector Revenue cum Land Acquisition Officer, Karaikal vide letter dated 29.0...
Dr.D.Manjula Prof(Retd), vs the Registrar,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-05-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 05.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No. 7325 of 2024 and W.M.P.No. 8203 of 2024 Dr.D.Manjula ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai 600 025. ....RespondentPRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in Procs.No.051/PR21/2022 dated 16.09.2022 and Ref.No.39454/PR21/93 dated 30.11.2022, quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to release all the retirement benefits due and payable from and at the time of retirement of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.Amalnath EK For Respondent : Mr.U.BaranidharanORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has received all the terminal benefits as prayed for in the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an e...
- ‹ Prev
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 124
- 125
- 126
- Next ›
- Last »