Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Sivasakthi vs the Tamilnadu Electricity
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
2026:MHC:86IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR S. Sivasakthi S/o. Late A.Sivasamy, No.34, Mettu Street, Vanniyar Palayam, Cuddalore-1. ..Petitioner(s) Vs..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for entire records relating to the proceedings in Letter No.08177/073/Va.Ve/Nir.2(4)/2002-1, dated 18.7.2002 on the file of the 3rd respondent and consequent proceedings in letter No.09685/455/Nir.2/Uthavi.4/so.Vaa.Ve/05 dated 3.6.2005 on the file of the 3 rdrespondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to give employment to the petitioner on compassionate grounds in any suitable posts and allow this W.P. with cost. For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.P.SubramanianORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) This matter had come u...
Dinesh vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
W.M.P.No.7573 of 2025 in W.P.No.2166 of 2025 P.T.ASHA, J., This petition has been filed to implead the proposed 5th respondent herein as 5th respondent in the above Writ Petition in WP.No.2166 of 2025.2. Considering the fact that St.Thomas Mount and Pallavaram have been included in the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, the proposed 5th respondent is not a necessary party to the proceedings.3. Therefore, the implead petition is dismissed. 07.01.2026 (3/3) shr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M.Ravi Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
2026:MHC:84IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.No. 1 of 20151. M.Ravi S/o.Munusamy, No.15, Bharath Nagar Extension,2. Smt.Malar W/o.Kubendran, No.16, Bharath Nagar3. M.Siva S/o.Mandra Gounder, No.27, Bharath Nagar4. Smt.K.Chokkammal W/o.Kannappan, No.10A, Bharath Nagar5. S.Samuel Prabakaran S/o.Steban Selvakumar, No.31, Bharath Nagar6. D.Manavalan S/o.G.Rajan, No.1/2, Bharath Nagar Extension,7. Smt.R.Rosy W/o.G.Rajan, No.1/2, Bharath Nagar Extension,8. A.Guna S/o.Angappa Reddy, No.8a, Bharath Nagar9. Smt.D.Mohana W/o.Dhanapaul, No.15, Bharath Nagar10.I.Rajan Rao S/o.K.,S.Iyan Rao, No.5, Bharath Nagar 11.S.Ekambaram S/o.Sarangam, No.1, Bharath Nagar Extension, 12.K.Elumalai S/o.Kannan, No.9, Bharath Nagar Extension, 2nd Cross Street. 13.S.Mohan S/o.Sundarrajan, No.5, Bharath Nagar Extension, 14.Smt.C.Padma W/o.Chokkalingam, No.9, Bharath Nagar 15.N.Kabalee...
S. Ganapathi vs the Principal Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA Nos. 479 & 480 of 2025 AND CMP Nos. 4124, 4125, 4129, 4130 OF 20251. S. Ganapathi Token Number 14476, Liaison Officer, LSC Kancheepuram, Kanchipuram District.2. R.Sudhakar Token Number- 14705 Liaison Officer, DRD Annamalai University Annamalainagar, Cuddalore District.3. G.Gopinath Token Number- 14292 Liaison Officer, Central Medical Library, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar, Cuddalore District.4. R.Saravanan Token Number- 13895 Liaison Officer, Lsc Rasipuram, Nammakkal District-637 408. Appellant(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary Higher Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Registrar (i/c) Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar. 3.The Director Advance Institute for Integrated Research on Livestock and Animal Science ( AIRLIVAS) Thalavadi Kottu Road, Salem. 4.R. Kulandaivel Token Number-14105, Liaison Officer, CDOE...
S.Vijayakuamr Vs M. Major Manoj and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL S.Vijayakuamr Postal Assistant, (Retired), Greams Road Post Office, Chennai 600 006. Residing at - J.K.Ganesh Flats, G2, 8/16, 34th Street, Nanganallur, Chennai-600 061. ..Petitioner Vs1. M. Major Manoj and Another Union of India Represented by Director of Postal Services O/o Postmaster General, Chennai City Region, Chennai 600 002.2. C.Swathi Madhurima Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Chennai City Central Division, Chennai-600017. ..ContemnorsPrayer : Contempt Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents for deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court W.P.No.34199 of 2017 dated 21.12.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.P.R.Satyanarayanan For Contemnors: Mr.V.Venkataswamy Babu, Senoir Panel Counsel __________Page 1 of 4Order(Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.) This contempt ...
T. Rajavarmacholan Vs Union of India represented by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL T. Rajavarmacholan Postal Assistant retired Cuddalore Postal division residing at No.7, Narayanasamy Nagar, Koothapakam, Cuddalore 607 002 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union of India represented byChief Postmaster General, Tamil Nadu Circle, Chennai 600 002. Director of Postal Services, O/o. PMG, Central Region, Tiruchirappalli 620 001. Superintendent of Post Offices, Cuddalore Postal Division, Cuddalore 607 001 ..Contemnors Prayer : Contempt Petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for deliberately disobeying the order of this hon'ble court W.P.no. 1354 of 2018 dated 21.12.2023 For Petitioner : Mr. P. R. Satyanarayanan For Contemnors : Mr.Venkataswamy Babu, Senior Panel Counsel, Central GovernmentOrder(Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.) This contempt petition has been fi...
C.Angalan Vs C.Govarthan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
Cont.P.No.653 of 2023R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP. DHANABAL, J.In order to make full compliance of theorder dated 13.10.2022 made in W.P.No.27394of 2022, steps had been taken by the Revenue Authorities, as stated by Mr.R.Raman Laal, learned Additional Advocate General.Pursuant to such steps of surveying the land to find out encroachments, they have found five such encroachments, where, in the Government land which is classified as 'lane', out of the five encroachments, three have been removed and the remaining two are yet to be removed and in order to remove such encroachments, a final notice has been given on 24.10.2025 by the Revenue Tahsildar of Vanur and a copy of which also has been filed before this Court, where, only 15 days' time has been given to these encroachers to remove such encroachments, failing which, direct action would be taken by the Revenue Authorities and the encroached portion would be demolished and be removed.Recording the said submission made by the le...
Roshan Nair, M/32 vs Inteligence Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.No.17633 of 2022 Roshan Nair ... Appellant Vs. The Intelligence Officer Chennai Zonal Unit. ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374(2) of Cr.P.C. to cal for the records in C.C.No.36 of 2015 on the file of I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under NDPS Act at Chennai and to set aside thejudgment and conviction imposed on the appellant.For Appellant : Mr.M.S.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar Special Public Prosecutor Page No.1 of 4JUDGMENTThe learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that since the appellant had undergone the period of sentence, nothing survives for adjudication and hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, the Criminal Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Co...
K.Rajagopal vs Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA K.Rajagopal ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Vellore District. (Crime No.485 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records in Crime No.485 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arun Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.485 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner who is the sole accused in this case has passed away on 18.04.2023.3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Crimina...
Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal Sangam, Vs The Management of Kalpat ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-07-2026
2026:MHC:127IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 07-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in W.A.Sr.No.35821 of 2025 Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal Sangam, The General Secretary Devi Ramani, 44A, Mariamman Koil Street, Balaji Avenue, Hasthampatti, Salem -7. Appellant(s) Vs1. The Management of Kalpataru Chemicals Private Limitd, Rep.by its Director K.Ravi, Post Box No.17, Krishnagiri Road, Hosur-635 109, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem. Respondent(s) PRAYERTo condone the delay of 2191 days in filing the Writ Appeal against the orderdated 04.02.2019 made in W.P.No.32109 of 2017. For Appellant(s): Ms.Rubika For Mr.N.Krishna Moorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.Venkatesh Prasad A.P. For M/s.Advit Law Chambers for R1 R2 - Labour CourtORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 2191 days in filing the Wri...
- ‹ Prev
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- Next ›
- Last »