Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
HARIKRISHNA Vs State reb by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Harikrishna S/o.Marappa, No. 1-90 Kadapalli Village, Karlakatta Post, Santhipuram Taluk, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. Petitioner(s) Vs1. State reb by Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri PEW Police station, Krishnagiri District Crime No. 458/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYERCriminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail as against the case pending on the file of the respondent police in Crime No.458 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. D.Thirumoorthy Mr. D.Rameshkumar For Respondent(s): Mr. A. Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.09.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (NDPS) 1985, in Crime No.207 of 2025, on the file of the respondent ...
R.RAJESH Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR R. Rajesh ... PetitionerVersusState rep. by, The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch Police Station, Thiruvallur. (Crime No.10 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, (BNSS) 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in respect of Crime No.10 of 2025, on the file of District Crime Branch Police Station, Tiruvallur, pending investigation. For Petitioner : Mr. S. Anburaja For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 31.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, in Crime No.10 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he is arrayed as A...
KAMALESH Vs The State by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR IN Kamalesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State by ..Respondent(s) Prayer: To relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP.No.26670 of 2025 dated 26.9.2025 that he should report on every Monday once in a week at 10.00 a.m., before the Respondent Police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Sairam For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.side) Page1 of 3ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP.No.26670 of 2025 by order dated 26.9.2025, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police on every Monday once in a week at 10,00 a.m., before the Respondent Police and thus render justice.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this Courtin Crl.OP.No.266...
JEEVANANTHAM Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
Crl.M.P.No.972 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No. 623 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 61 days in filing the Criminal Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.01.2026 Mac Note: Registry is directed to number the Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
A.AHMED MOHIDEEN Vs The Additional Secretary (Technical)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN A.Ahmed Mohideen S/o.Late.Abbas Ali No.1/225, D.Kavin Garden 2nd Bridge, Ooty Main Road, Mettupalayam Taluk Petitioner Vs 2.Manjula W/o.Chandran, Door No.4/3, Kothagiri Road, Odandurai, Mettupalayam-641 301 3.The Commissioner Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conduct enquiry on the 2nd respondents Statutory Appeal in Letter No.11078661/UD(L.Re-2/2025-1 dated 17.07.2025 along with petitioners implead petition dated 25.10.2025, after issuing notice to the respective parties concerned. For Petitioner: Mr. R.Veeramani For Respondents: Mr. E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government Pleader for R1 Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for R3.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard le...
C.GANGARATHINAM Vs The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
2026:MHC:349IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Review Appln. Nos.202, 193, 194, 195, 198, 199, 200, 201, 204 & 205 of 2025 and 35 of 2026 and Rev.Appln.No.202 of 2025: C.Gangarathinam ...PetitionerVs. 1.The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Rev.Appln.No.193 of 2025: C.V.Murali Krishna ...Petitioner Vs. Page No.:1/10 1.The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Rev.Appln.No.194 of 2025: C.Sudhakar Reddy ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, 2.The Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), 3.The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Rev.Appln.No.195 of 2025: 1.C.Sudhakar Reddy 2.C.Gangarathinam 3.C.V.Muralikrishna Page No.:2/10 4.C.Vijayasekara Reddy 5.C.Chandra Shekar 6.E.Thulasi 7.K.Thatha Reddy, 8.P.Bhasker ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The Member Secretary, No.1, Gandhi-Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. Rev.Appln.No.198 of 2025: C.Gangarathina...
G.Pari vs V.M.Amanullah (Died) M.Habeeb Nasiya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
C.M.P.No.1108 of 2026 in C.R.P.SR.No.140787 of 2025P.B.BALAJI, J.This petition is filed for condonation of delay of 4 days in filing the civil revision petition. I have gone through the affidavit filed and I am satisfied with the reasons assigned. Hence, the delay is condoned and C.M.P.No.1108 of 2026 is ordered. 27.01.2026 Jeni Note: Registry is directed to number the civil revision petition, if it is otherwise in order and post on 02.02.2026 for admission. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.Ravichanthiran Vs The District Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY G.Ravichanthiran .. Petitioner vs 4.L.Sakthi @ Sathya 5.P.Gopal 6.G.Lakshmanan .. RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 19.12.2025 by conducting an enquiry on the fraudulent document dated 03.01.2023 registered as Document No.89/2023 by the second respondent and cancel the same, consequently to remove the entry made in the register and the encumbrance certificate.For Petitioner : Dr.S.Lingesh For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3ORDERThe petitioner asserts that he had availed a loan from the sixth respondent and that as security in respect thereof, he executed a conveyance deed in favour of the sixth respondent on 26.09.2003. According to the petitioner, though the conveyance was ex...
Syed Sardar Vs The State Rep by,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
Crl. M.P. No.891 of 2026 in Crl.O.P.Sr.No.528 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.Dispense with ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Original Petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 27.01.2026 mrn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Sudha vs the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.M.P. No. 438 of 2026 in WP.No.23251 of 2024 V.Sudha ..Petitioner Vs1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Principal Secretary To Government,2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary To Government, Tamil Development and Information Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.4. The Member Secretary6. The Chairman Page1 of 4 ..Respondents For Petitioner: Mr.S.NedunchezhiyanORDERThis petition is filed to permit the petitioner to implead the Principal, Government Arts College (Autonomous) Kumbakonam Pin 612 002 as party respondent in W.P.No.23251 of 2024.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that newly proposed party is necessary and proper party to the writ petition.3. Considering the nature of averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the proposed party is impleaded as seventh respondent in the writ p...
- ‹ Prev
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- Next ›
- Last »