Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s.Core4 Engineers Private Limited Vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN in M/s.Core4 Engineers Pvt. Ltd., rep.by its Authorized Signatory Harsha Kumar C.D S/o.Dakshina Murthy C.C. No.12, 1st Floor Near Ramana Maharshi Gyana Kendra K-Block, Kuvempunagar Mysuru-570 023 ... Petitioner -vs- 1.Union of India rep.by the General Manager Park Town, Chennai-600 003 2.The Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (TRD) Madurai Division, Division Office Traction Distribution Branch Madurai-625 016 ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 62 days in filing the above writ appeal as against the order dated 03.09.2025, passed in W.P.(MD) No.23464 of 2025. For Petitioner : Mr.Bapat Sampath Vinayaka Rao For Respondents : Mr.R.Murali for R1 No appearance for R2ORDER[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed s...
Bhuvaneswari Vs Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
in Crl.R.C.(MD)SR.No.84686 of 2025 Heard Mr.K.Dinesh, learned counsel for Petitioner and Mr.D.Srinivasaraghavan, learned Counsel for Respondent.2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this CriminalMiscellaneous Petition has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the criminal revision case against the order passed in M.C.No.01 of 2024 dated 21.08.2025 by the learned Family Judge, Pudukottai District.3. Mr.D.Srinivasaraghavan, learned Counsel for the Respondent, has stated that he has no objection to allowing this petition.4. Being satisfied with reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 14 days in filing the above criminal revision case is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision case, if it is otherwise in order. gvn gvn in Crl.RC(MD).SR.No.84686 of 2025...
Nallathambi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Melavala ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.1614 & 1615 of 2026 1.Nallathambi 2.Perumal 3.Praveenkumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Melavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.79 of 2023. 2.Manimaran ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in PRC No.37/2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District and to quash the same as illegal. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Rajaram For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar (R1) Government Advocate (Crl.)ORDERThe petitioner seeks for quash of the charge sheet in PRC No.37/2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District.2. The petitioners are accused No.1, 2 & 5 in PRC No.37/2023 on the fileof the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District. The case ...
Bakiyam Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN and W.M.P.(MD) No.1582 of 2026 1.Bakiyam 2.Muphidathi 3.Mariappan 4.Appuranantham ... Petitioners -vs- 1.The District Collector / Inspector of Panchayat Tenkasi District, Tenkasi 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tenkasi Division, Tenkasi 3.The Tahsildar Alangulam Taluk Office Tenkasi District 4.Revenue Inspector Nettur Alangulam Taluk Tenkasi District 5.K.Balu ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the notice dated 17.12.2025 under reference Na.Ka.No.1031/2024/A2 as issued by the 3rd respondent under section 6 of Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 and subsequently quash the same as illegal, erroneous and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to conduct an enquiry afresh by affording an opportunity to the petiti...
Karuppanan @ Karuvayan Vs Meyyammai @ Babysevugan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
C.M.P(MD)No.256 of 2026 in S.A(MD)SR No.41625 of 2025K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.Pursuant to the direction of this Court in C.M.P(MD)No.256 of 2025, dated 12.01.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner has paid the cost of Rs.500/-and filed a copy of the cost memo to that effect.2. The said memo is recorded and the delay is condoned. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and list the matter in the usualcourse. 28.01.2026 das 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R.Niranjana Vs S.Ravishankar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED:27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and CMP No.826 of 2026 R.Niranjana ...Petitioner(s) Vs S.Ravishankar ...Respondent(s) Prayer in Tr.CMP No.37 of 2026: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure, pleased to order withdrawal of H.M.O.P.No.2390 of 2024 now pending on the file Learned V Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai and transfer the same to file of any other Family Court having similar and competent jurisdiction.Prayer in CMP No.826 of 2026: Petition filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in H.M.O.P.No. 2390 of 2024 now pending on the file Learned V Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.T.S.RajamohanORDERHeard.2. This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/ wife seeking transfer of the H.M.O.P.No.2390 of 2024, pending on the file of the ...
P V Raghul Balaje vs the State Rep by Its,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.M.P.No.851 of 2026 in Crl.OP.No.28091 of 2024 P.V.Raghul Balaje ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District. ... Respondent PRAYER : This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 to modify the condition order passed in Paragraph No.6(b) in Crl.OP.No.28091 of 2024 dated 06.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Thirumalai For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to modify one of the conditions imposed by this Court in Paragraph No.6(b) in Crl.OP.No.28091 of 2024 dated 06.02.2025 regarding the appearance of the petitioner before the concerned trial Court.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that now therespondent police has filed final report before the Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruppur, the same was taken on file in C.C.No...
Ragu Vs State rep.by its, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Ragu S/o Dhas, No.6/79, Sakthi Nagar, Masinaickenpatty, Vazhapadi, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs1. State rep.by its, The Inspector of Respondent(s)PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest a case in Crime NO.544 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner(s): M/s.C.DEEPAK KUMAR For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.544 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. This is 2nd anticipatory bail petition. Earlier anticipatory bail petitionof the petitioner was dismissed on 26.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.32223 of 2025 on the following reasons: 5. Considering the fact that huge quanti...
HARI @ HARIHARAN Vs State rep.by, Sub Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Hari @ HariharanS/o.Venkata Krishnan, No.1/59, Middle street, Chithanangur, Ulundurpettai, Villupuram District. and another 2.Deena @ Jiyanidinakaran S/o.Natarajan, No.2/142, Kanni Street, Neelathuraikudi, Umamaheswarapuram, Thiruvarur, Villupuram District. Petitioner(s) Vs1. State rep.by, Sub Inspector of Police, Respondent(s)PRAYER To enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with the Cr.No.290 of 2025 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s.V.Manimaran For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 6(4) of TNSC (RDCS) Order 1982 r/w Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.290 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.2. Earlier, this Court vide order dated 12.12.2025, 11.11.2025 &a...
Kumaresan Vs Kavitha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA and Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Kavitha 2.Divyabharathi ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and final order dated 17.11.2025 made in I.A. No. 7 of 2025 in I.A. No. 6 of 2025 in O.S. No. 93 of 2015 on the file of the Additional District Court, Attur. For Petitioner : Mr. T. Murugamanickam, Senior Counsel for Ms. Zeenath BegumORDERThe Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order of the learned Additional District Court, Attur, dated 17.11.2025, passed in I.A. No. 7 of 2025 in I.A. No. 6 of 2025 in O.S. No. 93 of 2015. nd2. The applicant is the 2 defendant, who had filed an application to deposit back the costs received by him pursuant to the order passed in the application filed by him in I.A.No.7 of 2025.3. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the plaintiffshad already ...
- ‹ Prev
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- Next ›
- Last »