Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopi @ Gobinath Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Gopi @ Gobinath Petitioner(s) Vs3. Nanthini Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): M/s. Srikanth.S. For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor Prayer: C-6AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 175 of 2025 on the file ofORDERToday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the accused was remanded by2. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 28-01-2026 KSA To3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai....
A.Peter Rubilas Vs Sivakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28/01/2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI A.Peter Rubilas ... Petitioner Vs1. Sivakumar, Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli.2. Saisubbulakshmi, District Educational Officer, Valliyoor, Tirunelveli. ... Respondents PRAYER :-Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents/contemnors for willful deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD).No.19148 of 2023 dated 12.03.2024.For Petitioner : Mr. V.Panneer Selvam, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with.2. Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, this Contempt Petition is closed. 28.01.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no Internet : yes / no pnn To1. The Chief Educational Officer, Tirunelveli..2. The District Educa...
T.Naganathan Vs Anbalagan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in in T.Naganathan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.Anbalagan, The District Revenue Officer, 2.Sangeetha The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.KV.Ravichandran, The Tahsildar, Madurai. ... Contemnors / Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to summon the contemnors 1 to 3 / respondents 1 to 3 and to punish them as per law for having willfully disobeyed the order of this Court made in C.M.P.No.13127 of 2025 in W.A.(MD)No.2319 of 2025, dated 08.08.2025. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Mathava Selvam For Respondents :Mr.F.Deepak Standing CounselORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Interim order granted by this Court has been complied with. The Contempt Petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi To 1.The District Reven...
Jeyachandran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Gudalur ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
in AND (Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 20 days in filing the above Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] aav AND aav in...
M/s. Sri Selva Vinayaga Wood Crafts Vs The Principal Secretary to Gove ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENGH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.(MD).No.22867 of 2025 M/s. Sri Selva Vinayaga Wood Crafts, represented by its Proprietor, Shanmugalingam ... Petitioner Vs Pudukkottai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to immediately open the Bids submitted for the Tender No. 3878/2025 and accept the petitioner's bids and pass suitable orders, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajarajan For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader For R-4 : Mr.G.MadhavanORDERToday, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that Tender No.3878 of 2025 has been cancelled.2. In view of the fact that a fresh tender is to be floated, the prayer sought for by the petitioner in this writ pet...
S.Antony Soosai Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in W.A.(MD)No.617 of 2020 S.Antony Soosai ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Through the Secretary, 4.P.Subramanian ...Respondents Prayer: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC, to review the order passed in W.A.(MD)No.617 of 2020, dated 22.08.2025. For Petitioner :Mr.J.John For Respondents :Mr.F.Deepak Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) We do not find any apparent error on the face of the record. The review application is dismissed. No costs. [G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No rmi To 1.The Secretary, G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J andK.RAJASEKAR, J.rmi...
Pavithiran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ramjinaga ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Pavithiran ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, In Crime No.123 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : C.Karthikeyan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-32B. For Bail in Crime No. 123 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-S.SRIMATHY, J.PJL The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted a letter dated 27.01.2026 to list the matter under the caption 'for withdrawal' and today he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the letter and endorsement, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. (S S Y J) 28.01.2026 PJL To1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.ORDERIN CRL OP(MD...
V.Rajamani Vs The Principal Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN in V.Rajamani ... Petitioner -vs- to the Government School Education Department Fort St.George, Chennai-9 2.The Director of School Education DPI Compound College Road, Chennai-600 006 3.The Chief Educational Officer O/o.The Chief Educational Officer Dindigul District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone the delay of 187 days in filing the above writ appeal as against the order dated 19.12.2024, passed in W.P.(MD) No.4731 of 2021. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Cibi Chakraborthy For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government PleaderORDER[Order of the Court was made by DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 187 days in the filing the above writ appeal.2. Learned Additional Government Pleader took notice for therespondents on 17...
A Dhanraj Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sattur Tal ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY A Dhanraj Petitioner(s) Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sattur Taluk Police Station, Sattur, Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.M. Arumugam For Respondent(s): Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (crl. Side) For Intervenor Mr.M. Solaisamy Prayer: C-38 AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. Not Known/2025 on the file of the respondent Police.ORDERBased on the complaint, the respondent police conducted an enquiry, and the same was closed. However, the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant vehemently objected to the closure of the First Information Report and relied on the order passed by this Court in CRL.O.P(MD) No. 20162 of 2025, wherein the petitioner herein had filed a petition seeking a direction not to harass him. In the said order, it was recorded that the petitioner had never appeared for enquiry, though three summons had been issued for his ...
Periyasamy Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Lalapetta ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA CRL.MP(MD) No.17732 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.1248 of 20251. Periyasamy2. Vinoth Kumar ..... Petitioners Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.365 of 2021) ... RespondentPrayer : Petition filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS to suspend the sentence imposed upon the petitioners by the District and Sessions Judge, Karur in S.C.No.26 of 2022 dated 08.10.2025 pending disposal of the above appeal For Petitioners : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar For Respondent : Mr..R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public ProsecutorORDER[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners, when this Court was about to dismiss the petition on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this court to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, permi...
- ‹ Prev
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- Next ›
- Last »