Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.DEVARAJAN Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.2001 of 2026 N.Devarajan ..Petitioner Vs The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Avadi CCB, Avadi Commissionerate CCB, Chennai-54. Crime No.60 of 2025. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the respondent police to file a final report before the competent court of law in Crime No.60 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Jeremiah For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Page1 of 5ORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent Police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.60 of 2025 before the jurisdictional court.2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learnedGovernment Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Polic...
N.SATHISHKUMAR Vs The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 06.03.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA N.Sathishkumar ..Petitioner Vs1. The State represented by The Superintendent of Police,2. The State represented byThe Inspector of Police, ..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner in the guise of enquiry without following due process of law. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondents : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERIt is submitted that when the matter was taken up on 30.01.2026, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) represented that based on the complaint given against the petitioner, an enquiry had been conducted and the same was closed on 04.01.2026. However, in the order copy, it has been stated that as if the enquiry is pending. Therefore, the matter has been listed today under the caption for being menti...
E.Akash Vs The State, Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR E.Akash ... PetitionerVersusThe State rep by its, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.521 of 2025) .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.521 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Dinesh For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No.521 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he joined hands withother two accused attacked the defacto complainant and two others indiscriminately and caused injuries to them. Hence, the case has been registered against the petitio...
O.K.Shanmugam vs Arumugam (Died) 1. a.Namachivayam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.Nos.2233 & 2236 of 2026 in A.S. No. 204 of 2019DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J These petitions have been filed to to discharge the 1st petitioner / 1st appellant as a guardian of the 3 rd petitioner / 3rd appellant Prethisha in the above appeal and to declare the 3rd petitioner / 3rd appellant Prethisha as major and permit her to prosecute the case in accordance to law respectively. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 4 who submits that they have got no serious objection in allowing these petitions. 3.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title.30.01.2026 ay https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
VIKRAM Vs The State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.2144 of 2026 Vikram ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.773 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.773 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Bharath Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *******ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) and 109(1) of BNS in Crime No.773 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that on account of previousenmity, the petitioner herein along with other accused picked up a wordy quarrel with the defacto...
K.Selvarajan Vs Amuthasurabi Educational Trust
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
C.M.P.No.2344 of 2026 in A.S.SR.No.13594 of 2026P.B.BALAJI, J.This petition is filed seeking condonation of delay of 190 days in filing this first appeal.2. The learned counsel for the respondents has no serious objection for condoning the delay.3. I have gone through the affidavit filed and I am satisfied with the reasons assigned. Hence, the delay is condoned and C.M.P.No.2344 of 2026 is ordered. 30.01.2026 JeniNote: Registry is directed to number and list the appeal for admission before the Joint Registrar, Appellate Side, if it is otherwise in order and post the matter on 04.02.2026 along with C.R.P.Nos.409 and 411 of 2026, under the caption For Orders https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
MURALI KRISHNAN Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Murali Krishnan ... PetitionerVersusThe State rep by its, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.90 of 2025) .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.90 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Muruganantham For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 471, 464, 465 and 468 of IPC, in Crime No.90 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.2. The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along with theother accused, collected a sum of Rs.29 lakhs from the defacto complainant and two others on the promise of arranging employment. Subsequently, they failed to fulfil...
Sivagami Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Sivagami Petitioner Vs The State Represented by The Inspector of Police Crime No.18 of 2026. Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her arrest in Crime No.18 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Mahendran For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has already been arrested.2. Recording the submission made by the learned GovernmentAdvocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 30-01-2026 drl To 1.The Inspector of Police 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. K.RAJASEKAR, J., drl 30.01.2026...
Venkatasubramani @ Venkatasubramaniam Vs The State Rep.by, The Inspect ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Venkatasubramani @ Venkatasubramaniam ... Petitioner / Accused Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Salem District. (Crime No.Not Known of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Crime No.Not known of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent. For Petitioners : Mr. S.N. Arunkumar For Respondent : M/s. J.R. Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******K. RAJASEKAR, J.stnORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dis...
The Executive Engineer Vs V.DHANASEKARAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.M.P.No.3201 of 2026 in Rev.Aplw.Sr.No.12211 of 2026 1.The Executive Engineer, Coimbatore 641 017. 2.The Assistant Engineer, Coimbatore 641 017. Petitioners vs. V.Dhanasekaran Respondent Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking condonation of delay of 173 days in filing the review petition against the order dated 03.07.2025 made in W.P.No.16396 of 2025.For Petitioners : Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh For Respondent : Mr.N.Karthikeyan ***** N.ANAND VENKATESH, JORDERThis petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 173 days in filing the review application against the order dated 03.07.2025 made in W.P.No.16396 of 2025.2. Heard learned counsel on either side.3. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 173 days in filing the review application is ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »