Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vinothkumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, T.Kallup ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21695 of 2025 Vinothkumar ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Crime No.217/2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.Jayaprakash For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :-To extend the time granted to the petitioners on 27.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.21695 of 2025 to surrender and execute the sureties.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to extend the time granted to the petitioner on 27.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No. 21695 of 2025 to surrender and execute the sureties. S.SRIMATHY,J PJL2. Heard both sides.3. Considering the facts and circumstances of thecase, this petition is ordered and the time already granted is extended for four weeks to surrender and execute the sureties as ordered by this Court, from the date on w...
Jegadeeshwaran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Kenik ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY 1.Jegadeeshwaran 2.Thamilselvan 3.Satheeshkumar ... Petitioners Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Kenikkarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District. Crime No.422/2025. .. Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.R.Vinodh For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :-C-60. To modify the condition in para No. 6(b)imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21628 of 2025 dt. 02.01.2026.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to modify the condition(b) in para No.6 imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P. (MD).No.21628 of 2025 dt. 02.01.2026.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent police.S.SRIMATHY, J.PJL3. Taking into consideration the submissions made,para No.6,condition No.(b) of ...
Kumar @ Kuttaikumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Kumar @ Kuttaikumar ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector of Police, Sholavandan Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.219 of 2016. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pratheesh For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-60. To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.23607 of 2025 dt. 18.12.2025.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.23607 of 2025 dated 18.12.2025. S.SRIMATHY,J PJL2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions regularly imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petition...
A.Mathikumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Keelava ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY A.Mathikumar ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector of Police, Keelavalavu Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.198 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.N.Mohamed Ayyadurai For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-60. To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21508 of 2025 dt. 26.08.2025.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.21508 of 2025 dated 26.08.2025. S.SRIMATHY,J PJL2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions regularly imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitio...
Sakthi Murugan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Shana ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Sakthi Murugan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, In Crime No. /2026. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : R.Aravindraj, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-38 AB. For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. /2026 on the file of the respondent Police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-S.SRIMATHY,J PJL The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted a letter dated 27.01.2026 to list the matter under the caption 'for withdrawal' and today he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the letter and endorsement, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 28.01.2026 PJL TO1. The Inspector of Police,2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.ORDERIN CRL OP(MD) No.1204 of 2026...
Jayapushpam Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and Crl.O.P(MD)No.18782 of 20251. Jayapushpam W/o. Jesuraj No.4/78 A 3 Arockiya Nagar Sillukuvarpatti Nilakottai taluk Dindigul District. Petitioner(s) VsRespondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Arockiasamy For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R1 and R2 Prayer: C-60.To extend the time for compliance of the orders passed by this Honble Court on 28.11.2025 in Crl MP.(MD). No.18806 of 2025 in Crl OP.(MD). No.18782 of 2025ORDERThis petition is filed to extend the time to comply the order in Crl.M.P(MD)No.18806 of 2025 in Crl.OP(MD)No.18782 of 2025 dated 28.11.2025.2. Considering the request of the petitioner, time is extended for a period of ten (10) daysfrom the date of receipt of copy of this order. It is made clear that no further extention will be granted. In default, the earlier order passed in favour of the petitioner will stand enforced.3. A...
Palraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Superintendent of Police ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Palraj ... Petitioner Vs. 3.Amirthakani 4.Mariyammal 5.Anthony Mary @ Ananthi 6.Mathanraj 7.Saravanan 8.Anitha Veni ... RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 particularly the second respondent to take For Petitioner :Mr.R.Murugappan For Respondents :Mr.A.S.Abul Kaalam Azad, (for R1 & R2) Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThis writ petition has been filed for Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 particularly the second respondent to take2. Today when the matter was taken up for hearing the learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner's complaint was already enquired and the same was closed.3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Writ Petition isdisposed of. How...
Eswaran @ Kodeeswaran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
Crl.M.P(MD) No.1592 of 2026 in Crl.A(MD)Sr.No.3726 of 2026G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.ANDR.POORNIMA,J.Dispensed with for the present. [G.K.I., J.] [R.P., J.] 28.01.2026 aav Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal and list it for admission in the usual course. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Eswaran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sivagangai T ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Eswaran Petitioner(s) Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sivagangai Taluk Crime No.372 of 2025. Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Srinivasan For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public Prosecutor Prayer: C-31B. For Bail in Crime no.372 of 2025 on the file of the Respondent Police.ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.2. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 28-01-2026 KSA To1. The Inspector Of Police, Sivagangai Taluk2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.S.SRIMATHY,J.ksa CRL OP(MD). No. 1472 of 2026 Date : 28.01.2026...
Shaik Dawood Vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.1574 of 2026 Shaik Dawood .. Petitioner Vs Union of India, Rep. By the Superintendent of Customs, Madurai Airport, Madurai District. In OR No.11 of 2025. .. Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.M.Shakulhameed For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar PETITION FOR LOWER COURT BAIL MODIFICATION Under Sec.483(1)(b) r/w 528 of BNSSPRAYER :- C-33R.To modify the condition imposed by the Principal Sessions Court for Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Cases, Madurai, in Crl.M.P.No.2714 of 2025 dated 31.12.2025 to with their own bond without solvency instead of on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- along with two sureties out of which one surety with solvency (both sureties are must be blood sureties and also both sureties are must be petitioner's own Locality).S.SRIMATHY,J PJLORDERwhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- Next ›
- Last »