Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sivasubramanian M Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 28.01.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR 1.M.Sivasubramanian ....Petitioner in WP.No.1065 of 2026 2.M.Amaresan ....Petitioner in WP.No.1066 of 2026 Vs Tenkasi District ....Respondents in both petitionsCommon Prayer: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent's affixed impugned notice for the auction of the commercial complex shops at Piranoor Panchayat, Sengottai Taluk, Tenkasi District which is scheduled to be held on 12.01.2026 and the same has to be quashed as devoid of merits and consequently directing the third respondent toimplement the order dated 01.12.2025 in favour of the petitioner regarding the Shop Nos.9 and 24 based on the petitioners' representation dated 05.01.2026 and 07.01.2026 respectively.(In both petitions) For Petitioner : Mr.R.Iyappan For Respondents :M/s.D.Farjana Ghoushi...
Senthikumar Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep.by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. State of Tamilnadu Rep. by the Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 177 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.B. Arun For Respondent: Mr.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13997 of 2025 dated 25.08.2025.ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed to the petitioner in Crl.O. P.(MD)No.13997 of 2025 dated 25.08.2025.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is complying with theorder regularly.4. In view of the aforesaid submission, the condition i...
Gandhi @ Rajendran @ Siluvai Antony Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA CRL.MP(MD) No.1675 of 2026 in Crl.A(MD)No.855 of 20251. Gandhi @ Rajendran@ Siluvai@ Antony2. Ganesan @ Ganesh3. Silmbararan @ Simbu4. Johnpaul @ Sesuvadiyan paul@ Sedaiyan Paul5. Vino@Vinoth ..... Petitioners Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.11 of 2008) ... RespondentPrayer : Petition filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners in session case No.248 of 2019 on the file of the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District dated 17.06.2025. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Deepak For Respondent : Mr..R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public ProsecutorORDER[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners, when this Court was about to dismiss the petition on m...
Sanjay @ Arul Sahayaraj Vs The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspect ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA CRL.MP(MD) No.1667 of 2026 in Crl.A(MD)No.859 of 20251. Sanjay @ Arul Sahayaraj2. Antran3. James4. Michael5. Antony Michael ..... Petitioners Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.11 of 2008) ... RespondentPrayer : Petition filed under Section 430(1) of BNSS to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioners in session case No.248 of 2019 on the file of the learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District dated 17.06.2025. For Petitioners : M/s.M.Shunmalar For Respondent : Mr..R.Meenakshi Sundaram Additional Public ProsecutorORDER[Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.] After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners, when this Court was about to dismiss the petition on merits, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission...
Arun Murugan @ Varun Krishna Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28.01.2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Arun Murugan @ Varun Krishna ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by the Inspector of Police, CCB Police Station, Madurai City. Crime No.45 of 2025. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.Srinivasaragavan For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- C-60. To relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P(MD)No.14789 of 2025 in Crl.O.P. (MD).No.16549 of 2025 dt. 16.10.2025.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P(MD)No.14789 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16549 of 2025 dated 16.10.2025. S.SRIMATHY,J PJL2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions regularly imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.3. The l...
R.Muthukumar Vs The State Of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 28.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE N.MALA WP.Crl.(MD)No.430 of 2026 R.Muthukumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Central Range, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Chennai-16. 3.The District Collector Pudukkottai District. 4.The Divisional Engineer [Highways] Construction & Maintenance Division Pudukkottai. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition [Criminal] filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to conduct enquiry on the complaint sent by the petitioner dated 30.09.2025 within the reasonable time to be fixed by this Court at once. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian For R1, R2 & R3 : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(1)This writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus to direct the 1 st and 2nd respondents to conduct enquiry on the...
Esakkidurai @ Vijay Vs The State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY in Esakkidurai @ Vijay ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, (Crime No. 557 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.S. Sivaprakash For Respondent: Mr.S.Manoj Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PRAYER :- To relax the condition imposed to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.23516 of 2025 dated 18.12.2025.ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed to the petitioner in Crl.O. P.(MD)No.23516 of 2025 dated 18.12.2025.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police raised an objection to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner.4. Considering the facts of the case, the condition i...
Vayalur Kannan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Shola ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Vayalur Kannan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Sholavandan Police Station, Madurai District. Crime No.170/2014. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S. Bala Karthick, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar, Additional Public ProsecutorPETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- To enlarge the petitioner/6th Accused on bail in connection with the case in Spl S.C.No.72 of 2018 on the file of the Learned Sessions Judge, Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Madurai.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.10.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 294(b), 506(2) of IPC r/w. Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 altered into Se...
Alagu Solaimalai Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sei ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
in AND (Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 514 days in filing the above Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] aav AND aav in...
Arulselvam Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Thiruchen ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-28-2026
in AND (Order of the Court was made by G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,J.) This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 162 days in filing the above Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post the appeal for admission in the usual course.[G.K.I.,J] & [R.P.,J] aav AND aav in...
- ‹ Prev
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- Next ›
- Last »