Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Saravanan Vs The district Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR R.Saravanan .. Petitioner vs 4.R.Sindhuja Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,praying to issue a Writ of Declaration to declare that the impugned orderpassed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.693/2018/Aa3 dated 02.11.2018 as illegal, void and un-constitutional. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondents : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran for R1 Special Government Pleader Mr.R.S.Selvam for R2 and R3 Government Advocate Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi for R4ORDERMr.P.Vijendran, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Leaned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents do not dispute the aforesaid submission.3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel on eitherside and e...
AZHAGU Vs The State by through, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN in Azhagu ... Petitioner Vs. State rep by through The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District. .. Respondent (Cr.No.297 of 2023) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner to appear before the jurisdictional Court in Crl.MP.No.17082 of 2023 dated 30.10.2023 in Crl.OP.No.19563 of 2023 dated 05.09.2023.For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kalimuthu For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Paragraph No.3(b) in Crl.MP.No.17082 of 2023 dated 30.10.2023 in Crl.O.P.No.19563 of 2023 dated 05.09.2023 that the petitioner shall appearing before the respondent police once a week,i.e., every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until the filing of the charge sheet and thereafter as directed by this concerned jurisdictional Court.2. Though...
Annamalai University Vs R.Rajendran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
C.M.P.No.2695 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.11927 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 223 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.V.Ajoy Khose takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 01.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Annamalai University vs S. Dhanasekaran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
C.M.P.No.2763 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.13599 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 189 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.R.Krishnaswamy takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 01.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals vs the Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No. 37656 of 2005 and W.P.No. 36415 of 2005 Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, East Coast Centre, No.553, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018. ...Petitioner in both the Writ Petitions Vs. 1.The Commercial Tax Officer, No.46, Greenways Road, T.Nagar (East) Assessment Circle, Chennai 600 028. 2.The State of Tamil Naud, Represented by the Secretary to Government, Department of Commercial Taxes and Religious Endowments, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. ...Respondents in both the Writ PetitionsPRAYER in W.P.No.37656 of 2005: This Petition came to be numbered by transfer of O.P.No.448 of 2001 from the file of the Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal, Chennai under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Act 42 of 1992 after abolition of the Tribunal in 2004 praying to pass appropriate orders forbearing the 1st and 2nd respondents ...
State of Tamilnadu vs S Thananjayan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
C.M.P.No.3232 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.17207 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.Order of the Court was made byR.Suresh Kumar,J.This petition is filed to dispense with the production of the original impugnedorder dated 18.12.2023 made inW.P.No.14581 of 2023. Since web copy of the order has been filed along with the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered as prayed for. (R.S.K.,J.) (H.C.,J.) 01.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Adaikalam Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI K.Adaikalam ... Petitioner Vs6. Elumalai ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.10.2020 and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.Sam Jayaraj Houston For Respondents : Mr.G.Velu Additional Government Pleader for R1, R2, R4 & R5 Mr.D.Arun Kumar for R3 Not ready notice for R6ORDERThis petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.10.2020 and pass orders.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and to that effect, he has made an endorsement in the bundle.3. Recording the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petit...
S.Marappa Gounder Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S.Marappa gounder ...Petitioner -Vs-Namakkal. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Gazettee notification dated 29.01.1999 by the first respondent regarding ROC.No.20831/97(D-2) dated 25.01.1999 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar Government AdvocateORDERThe writ petition has been filed challenging the Gazettee notification dated 29.01.1999 by the first respondent regarding ROC.No.20831/97(D-2) dated 25.01.1999, thereby acquired the petitioner's land under the Harijan Welfare Scheme.2. It is seen that the sole petitioner died on 04.07.2024 itself.Even till today the legal heirs did not take any steps to substitute themselves as party to this writ petition. It shows that...
P.Ashok Kumar vs Mr.Rajendra Kumar Daga and 4 Others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA A No. 3079 of 2025 and in CS No. 132 of 2009,1. P.Ashok Kumar No.51, Hunters Road, Chennai 600 112. Applicant(s) Vs1. Mr.Rajendra Kumar Daga And 4 Others No.1-A, Chandanbala Annex - II, Door No.1, Brithapet Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. No.40A(24A) Dewan Rama Road, Purasawakkam, Chennai 600 084. No.199, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai 600 001. Respondent(s)1. P.Ashok Kumar No.51, Hunters Road, Chennai 600 112. Applicant(s) Vs1. Mr.Rajendra Kumar Daga And 4 Others No.1-A, Chandanbala Annex - II, Door No.1, Brithapet Road, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. No.40A(24A) Dewan Rama Road, Purasawakkam, Chennai 600 084.No.199, Thambu Chetty Street, Chennai 600 001. Respondent(s) PRAYER : To set aside the ex parte decree dated 10/07/2012 passed in the above suit in C.S.No.132 of 2009. PRAYER : To implead the Applicant/5th Proposed Defendant as Party 5th Defendant in the above suit C.S.No.132 of 2009. For...
Raja Stalin vs Madhaiyan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Raja Stalin .... Petitioner Vs Madhaiyan ... Respondent Revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against theorder dated 19.10.2022 passed in R.E.P No.96 of 2020 in O.S.No.53 of2007on the file of I Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem. For Petitioner: Mr.L.Rajendran For Respondent: Mr.P.JagadeesanORDERWhen the matter is taken up today for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled out of court and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the revision petition, the civil revision petition is dismissed as settled out of court. No costs. Index: Yes/No Website:yes/noSpeaking Order/Non-speaking Ordersr P.B.BALAJI.,J sr To I Additional Subordinate Court, Salem....
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »