Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ritesh Vs State Rep By Its, Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Ritesh M/age 30 years S/o Pandi Rajavel Nagar, Varasanaadu, Aandipatti Taluk Theni District. ..Petitioner/Accused/versus/State rep.by its Inspector of Police NIB CID Police Station Coimbatore (Cr.No.18 of 2020) ..Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with the C.C.No.86 of 2022 on the file of the Additional District Judge/Presiding Officer, Special Court for Essential Commodities Act cases at Coimbatore District). For Petitioner :Mr.D.Padmanabhan For Respondent :Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.03.2023 for the offences under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C), 27A and 29(1) of NDPS Act, 1985 in Crime No.18 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipa...
A.M.Kaja Hussain vs State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR A.M. Kaja Hussain ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State Rep by The Inspector of Police, D-1, Ramanathapuram Police Station, Coimbatore2. Josephin Shanthin . ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records and quash the proceedings pending as against the petitioner is concerned in C.C.No.2353 of 2019 pending on the file of Mahila Court at Magisterial Level, Coimbatore as far as the petitioner is concerned and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.K. Balasubramaniam For Respondents : Mr.R. Vinoth Raja Government AdvocateORDERThis Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings pending as against the petitioner is concerned in C.C.No.2353 of 2019 pending on the file of Mahila Court at Magisterial Level, Coimbatore as far as the petitioner is concerned.2. Totally there are 6 accused in this case and the p...
Sathih Kumar @ Susil vs the State Rep by, the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-02-2025
inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 02.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN in Sathih Kumar @ Susil ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Crime No.96 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to relax the condition imposed against the petitioner that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders in Crl.O.P.No.6230 of 2025 dated 05.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sebastian Raj For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) inORDERThe petitioner has been granted bail for the offences punishable under Sections 126, 296(b), 109 and 351(3) of BNS [Sections 341, 294(b), 307 and 506(ii) of IPC] in Crime No.96 of 2025. Thus, the petitioner seeks relaxation for the condition imposed against the petitioner that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday a...
Trinayan Konwar Vs The Union of India,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.Nos. 249, 252, 256, 259 and 260 of 2019 W.P.No.230 of 2019: Trinayan Konwar .. Petitioner vs (13)/ TK/ 2015/ 9526 dated 28.12.2018 issued by the respondents rejecting W.P.No.233 of 2019: Ravinder .. Petitioner vs (12)/ R/ 2015/ 9525 dated 28.12.2018 issued by the respondents rejecting W.P.No.235 of 2019 R.Devendhran .. Petitioner vs (14)/ RD/ 2015/ 9527 dated 28.12.2018 issued by the respondents rejecting W.P.No.239 of 2019 Ravi Pratap Singh Bhadoria .. Petitioner vsthe impugned show cause notice No. V-15014/ CISF/ NLC/ DISC/ MAJ-(II)/ RPSB / 2015/ 9524 dated 28.12.2018 issued by the respondents rejecting the petitioner's representation dated 05.12.2018 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional. W.P.No.241 of 2019 Asai Thambi .. Petitioner vs the impugned show cause notice No. V-15014/ CISF/ NLC/ DISC/ MAJ-(17)/ ATV/ 2015/ 9528 dated 28.12.2018 issued by the...
Rama Muthaiah Vs The Principal Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Rama Muthiah ...Petitioner -Vs-4. The Chennai Metro Rail Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director, Koyambedu, Chennai 600 107. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the second respondent, the Revenue Divisional Officer and Land AcquisitionOfficer, South Chennai Revenue Division, Guindy, Chennai 600 032, in respect of impugned Form-A (See Rule 3) Show Cause Notice dated 03.12.2018 issued under Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (Tamil nadu Act 10 of 1999) for the land and building (house) situated at Old No.70, New No.163, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004, in survey No.1650/23, Mylapore Part-I Village, Mylapore Taluk, Chennai District for Corridor 4-05-Alwarpet Metro Station more fully descri...
Malliga Vs N. Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
CMP No.21181 of 2025 in CRP SR No.6488 of 2025P.B.BALAJI.,J.The petition filed to dispense with the production of certified copy of the decreetal and fair order dated 15.10.2024 in E.A.No.258 of 2017 in EP No.43 of 2003 on the file of Subordinate Court, Madurantakam is ordered. 01.092025 sr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.MOHAMMED MOHIDEEN Vs The Special Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.2493 of 2020 S.Mohammed Mohideen ... Petitioner Vs Chennai. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to frame scheme of Administration of M.K.N.Madarsa Trust, Athiramapattinam, Tanjore District in terms of Trust Deed (Wakf Deed) dated 06.04.1901 and 16.12.1900 as per Section 69 of the Wakf Act 1985. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ravishankar For Respondents : Mr.Abdul Mubeen M.DHANDAPANI.J.,ORDERThis petition has been filed to direct the respondent to frame scheme of Administration of M.K.N.Madarsa Trust, Athiramapattinam, Tanjore District in terms of Trust Deed (Wakf Deed) dated 06.04.1901 and 16.12.1900 as per Section 69 of the Wakf Act 1985.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this ...
Cakes N Bakes vs the Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No. 19651 of 2007 Cakes N Bakes, Represented by its Managing Partner, V.K.Nichani, No.32, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. ...PetitionerVs. 1.The Commercial Tax Officer, Valluvarkottam Assessment Circle, 621, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006. 2.The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), III V Floor, Kuralagam Annexe, Chennai 600 108. 3.The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Represented by its Secretary, Additional Bench, New City Civil Court Buildings, High Court Complex, Chennai 104. ...Respondents PRAYER: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for the records on the file of the 3rd respondent herein in T.A.No.534 of 2001 dated 14.09.2006 and issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the same. For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.Parthasarathi For Respondents : Mr.C.Harsharaj Additional Government Pl...
M/S.Sivakumar and Co vs the Tamilnadu Sales Tax
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN M/s.Sivakumar and Co., Perundurai Road, Erode. ...Petitioner Vs.1.The Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, (Additional Bench), Coimbatore, Rep. By its Secretary, Coimbatore. 2.The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), Erode. 3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Erode (Rural). ...Respondents PRAYER: This Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1 st respondent in CTSA.No.421 of 2000 and quash the order dated 28.12.2006 passed therein and restore the order passed by the 2nd respondent in A.P.No.45 of 1997 dated 02.01.1998.For Petitioner : Mr.C.Subramanian For Mr.K.J.Chandran For Respondents : R1- Tribunal Mr.C.Harsharaj, Special Government Pleader for R2 & R3 *****ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Writ on hand has been instit...
The Annamalai University Vs R.Thiruvarasan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-01-2025
C.M.P.No.2701 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.10057 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 186 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.V.Ajoy Khose takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 01.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »