Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
MADHAN Vs The State Rep By, The Sub-Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Madhan ... Petitioner Vs. State rep by:- The Sub-Inspector of Police, Chennai. (Crime No.112 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.112 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Santhosh For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThe petitioner herein was arrested by the respondent police on 25.04.2024 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c), 22(c) & 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and remaded to the judicial custody, in Crime No.112 of 2024, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police found the accused persons in illegal possession of 1920 Nitrovet tablets. Hence, the case.3. The learne...
Rajaram Mohan Vs The District Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And 1 Rajaram Mohan 2 Parvathavarthi 3 Raghupathy 4 Boopathi 5 Gunavathi 6 Gowri Shankar 7 Angayarkanni ... Petitioners Vs. Erode. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to register the sale agreement presented for registration which is refused in RFL No.22/2019 vide dated 25.04.2019 on the file of the second respondent within the time stimulated by this Hon'ble Court to the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.T.Vijay for M/s.G.R.Deepak For Respondents : Mr.U.Baranidharan Special Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek the permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. 2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this writ petiti...
A.Ramadoss Vs Thiru. M.Prathap
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN A.Ramadoss ... Petitioner Vs. M.Prathap, District Collector, Tiruvallur District. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to initiate contempt proceedings for the willful disobedience and to punish the respondent herein for not complying with the direction of this Court dated 30.10.2024 made in W.P.No.23728 of 2019. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Velmurugan For Respondent : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non compliance of the order dated 30.10.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.23728 of 2019, thereby directed the respondent to consider and dispose the representation submitted by the petitioners on merits and in accordance with law.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondentsubmitted that as directed by this ...
Gunapushanam Vs M.Pushpalatha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.Gunapushanam 2.D. Santhi 3.S.Bhuvaneshwari ... Petitioners Vs. M. Pushpalatha ... Respondent Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 02.09.2024 passed in W.P.No.24946 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr. R. Abdul Mubeen For Respondent : Mr. G. Velu, Additional Government PleaderORDERWhen the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.G.Velu, the learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondent would submit pursuant to the direction issued by this Court in the main writ petition, anorder was passed by the respondent in her proceedings inNa.Ka.No.305/2024/M1 dated 29.04.2025. The copy of the order was also handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.2. Recording the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for ...
Gummala Seshu vs the State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Gummala Seshu ... Petitioner Vs. State rep by:- The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.60 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.60 of 2024 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Deepakkumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThe petitioner herein was arrested on 25.08.2024 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(C) and 25, 29(1) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and remanded to the judicial custody, in Crime No.60 of 2024, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the respondent police found the accused persons in illegal possession of 270 kgs of ganja. Hence, the case.3. The learned counsel appearing fo...
A.Baskaran vs the Government of Puducherry
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR W.P.Crl. No.13893 of 2025 and WMP.Nos.15620 & 15621 of 2025 1.A.Baskaran 2.G.Raj Mohan 3.P.Sowri Rajan 4.Gnanasekaran 5.K.Puthisigamani 6.K.Gopal Samy ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Government of Puducherry, rep. by its Sub Divisional Magistrate, Karaikal. 2.The Station House Officer, Town Police Station, Kariakal. 3.Mohan Dass 4.Murugan 5.Swaminathan 6.Shanmugam 7.M.K.Selvam 8.P.Subramanian ... RespondentsPrayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent relating to the order dated 19.02.2025 in M.C.No.12 of 2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Karaikal and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2025. For Petitioners : Ms.M.Kaviya For Respondent-1 & 2 : Mr.K.S.Mohanda...
Parthiban Vs Joseph Diaz, and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.J Parthiban ... Petitioner Vs Chennai 600 002. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempts of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for having wilfully disobeyed theorder dated 05.12.2024 made in W.P.No.37125 of 2024 under the Contempt ofCourts Act, 1971 and pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Venkatachalam For Respondents : Mr.K.Raja Standing Counsel for R1 No Appearance for R2ORDERThis petition has been filed to punish the respondents for having wilfully disobeyed the order dated 05.12.2024 made in W.P.No.37125 of 2024 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass orders.2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel on either side submits that the order of this Court dated 05.12.2024 has been complied with and the entire benefits have been settled along with interest.3. Recording the same, this Contemp...
S.Rani, W/o.Sakkarai Vs The District collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P.No.26979 of 2018 S.Rani ... Petitioner Vs1. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.2. The Tahsildar, Thandarampattu Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.3. Thangaraj ... RespondentsPrayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No.AA2/8843/ 2012 dated 13.06.2018 on the file of the 2nd Respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 to allot the land in S.No.114/2, 114/3, 114/25 and 114/37 of Agarampallipattu village, Thandarampattu Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District to the petitioner.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arokia Maniraj For R1 & R2 : Mr.T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.Arunkumar for Mr.R.ThirumoorthyORDERThis Writ Petition has been...
K. Sivanantham Vs Union Of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN K.Sivanantham ... Petitioner Vs. The Union of India, Through the Intelligence Officer, (N.C.B.F.No.48/1/02/2022-NCB/MDS) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in C.C.No.26 of 2022 pending trial on the file of the learned Special Judge, I Additional Special Court for Exclusive Trial Cases under NDPS Act. For Petitioner : Mr.K.G.Senthil Kumar For Respondent : Mr.N.P.Kumar Special Public Prosecutor (NCB Cases)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.02.2022, for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(c), 25, 27A, 28 & 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 in C.C.No.226 of 2022 in N.C.B.F.No.48/1/02/2022-NCB/MDS, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.2. The petitioner is a truck driver bearing registration No.TN 18 AD1478. On s...
Geoffrey Jesudason vs Daphne Hazarika
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
CMP.No.12691 of 2025 in OSA.Sr.No.15231 of 2024S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.ANDC.SARAVANAN, J.[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] Ordered, as prayed for.2. Notice to the impleaded respondents, returnable in two weeks. Private notice is also permitted.3. Post the matter after two weeks for filing counter in the main case. (S.M.S., J.) (C.S.N., J.) 03.09.2025 gd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »