Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Djayagopy vs Mrs. Saint Jean Camala
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.No.11712 of 2018 in A.S.No.570 of 2013S.SOUNTHAR,J.This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 238 days in representing C.M.P.SR.No.18584 of 2017 in A.S.No.570 of 2013, which has been filed to bring on record the legal representatives of deceased sole respondent in main appeal, namely Saint Jean Camala.2. The petitioners/appellants filed new setof petitions to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent namely Mrs.Saint Jean Camala, to condone the delay of 1203 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole respondent Mrs.Saint Jean Camala and to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the sole respondent Mrs.Saint Jean Camala in the above appeal in C.M.P.Nos.9554, 9556 and 9559 of 2020. Therefore, this civil miscellaneous petition is unnecessary.3. Hence, C.M.P.No.11712 of 2018 is dismissed as unnecessary. 03.09.2025 (2/3) dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
B.K.Chandra, Vs The Inspector General of Registration,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And 1 B.K.Chandra 2 A.M.Paranthaman ... Petitioners Vs. Arakonam 631 001. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the second respondent's order Na.Ka.N.153/AA1/2019 dated 18.01.2019 and the third respondent's Order No.RFL/No.1 Joint Sub-Registrar/3/2018 dated 28.12.2018, quash the same and direct the third respondent herein to Register the Sale Deed dated 22.10.2018 executed by the second petitioner herein, in favour of first petitioner herein. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Jayakirubaa For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu Additional Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek the permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition. 2.In view of the endorse...
Muniyandi Vs Dr. K.S. Palaniswamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Muniyandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Dr.K.S. Palaniswamy, IAS The Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2.S. Sheik Abdul Rahaman, The District Collector, Villupuram District. 3.K. Haridoss, The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District. 4.E. Siva, The Thahsildhar, Thindivanam, Villupuram District. ... Respondents Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 18.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.30946 of 2024 causing Contempt of Court. For Petitioner : Mr. K.C. Karl Marx For Respondents : Mr. T.M. Rajangam, Government AdvocateORDERWhen the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.T.M.Rajangam, the learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents would submit pursuant to the direction issued in main writ pet...
Dr.V.J.Niranjana Bharathi vs Board of Ethics and Registration for Home ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Dr.V.J.Niranjana Bharathi ... Petitioner Vs.1. Board of Ethics and Registration for Homoeopathy National Commission for Homoeopathy Rep.by its President,2. Tamil Nadu Homoeopathy Medical Council, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent herein to recognize M.F.(Hom) degree obtained by the petitioner herein and consequently direct the second respondent to register M.F.(Hom) degree pursuant to the application for registration submitted by the petitioner herein dated 27.09.2023 under Section 15 and the Third Schedule of the Homoeopathy Central Council Act, 1973 (59 of 1973) read with Section 47 and 59 of the National Commission for Homoeopathy Act, 2020 asPage Nos.1/4 amended therein within a reasonable period of time as may be fixed by this Court. ...
Manonmani vs Manikandan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMANTr.C.M.P.Nos.446, 447 & 448 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.10021, 10045 & 10129 of 2023 Tr.C.M.P.Nos.446 of 2023: Manonmani W/o.Late Soundharajan, Petitioner(s) Vs 1.Manikandan S/o.Parasuraman, No.211, Muniramappa Garden, Bharath Nagar, Cox Town, Bangalore, Karnataka State-560 005. 2.The Manager Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited, No.15/B, R.R.Complex, Polur Road, Tiruvannamalai. Respondent(s)Tr.C.M.P.Nos.447 of 2023: 1.Manonmani W/o. Late Soundharajan, 2.Minor Dayana D/o.Late Soundharajan, 3.Minor Suji D/o.Late Soundharajan, 4.Minor Vetri S/o.Late Soundharajan, Petitioner(s) Vs 1.ManikandanS/o.Parasuraman, No.211, Muniramappa Garden, Bharath Nagar, Cox Town, Bangalore, Karnataka State-560 005. 2.The Manager Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited, No.15/B, R.R.Complex, Polur Road, Tiruvannamalai. Respondent(s) Tr.C.M.P.Nos.448 of 2023: Minor Subakeerthi D/o.Madhu,...
Thirunavukkarasu Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 03.09.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.13405 of 2021 --- Thirunavukkarasu .. Petitioner Vs. First Floor, Collectorate, Thiruvallur-602 001.3. The Tahsildar,4. Vijei Aqua Industries, S.No.185/1F, Eerie Bettai, Chembarambakkam, Poonamallee Taluk, Thiruvallur District. .. RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1-3 to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 26.04.201 to take permanent necessary legal action against the fourth respondent for the unauthorised and unapproved Page No.1/3 sucking/withdrawal of ground water in the Poonamallee Taluk, within the time fixed by this Court and for consequential orders. For petitioner : M/s.V.Srimathi For respondents: Mr.T.M.Rajangam, Govt. Advocate for RR-1 to 3 Not ready in notice for R-4ORDERIn view of the representation made by the learned counsel for ...
T.Kanthimathy vs the Sub Registrar Office
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY T.Kanthimathy ... Petitioner Vs. Tiruvallur. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to act on the representation dated 29.01.2024 sent by the petitioner and cancel the endorsements relating to mortgage in S.No.160/1, 161/6, 161/7, For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gokula Kannan For Respondent 1 : Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader For Respondent 2 : Mr.D.GopalORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Considering the submission coupled with an endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Speaking/Non-speaking orderIn...
R.Sulochana, Vs Tmt. Rakkikumari,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Contempt Petition No.1463 of 2025 R.Sulochana ... Petitioner -Vs- Rakkikumari The Inspector of Police, RK Pet Police Station, Thiruvallur District 631 303. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish respondent for willfully disobeying the order of this Court passed in Crl.O.P.No.25568 of 2021 dated 03.01.2022.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nagarajan For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of the orderpassed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.25568 of 2021 dated 03.01.2022.2. The petitioner had filed Crl.O.P.No.25568 of 2021 seeking for adirection to the respondent police to file a charge sheet in Crime No.2341 of 2020 and this Court by the order dated 03.01.2022 directed the respondent to comply with the order within a period...
M.Ravi / Female , AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS Vs Rakkikumari
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Contempt Petition No.1485 of 2025 M.Ravi ... Petitioner -Vs- Rakkikumari The Inspector of Police, RK Pet Police Station, Thiruvallur District 631 303. ... Respondent Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish respondent for willfully disobeying the order of this Court passed in Crl.O.P.No.25480 of 2021 dated 03.01.2022.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nagarajan For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThe contempt petition has been filed for non-compliance of the orderpassed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.25480 of 2021 dated 03.01.2022.2. The petitioner had filed Crl.O.P.No.25480 of 2021 seeking for adirection to the respondent police to file a charge sheet in Crime No.536 of 2019 and this Court by the order dated 03.01.2022 directed the respondent to comply with the order within a period of th...
Alamelu vs Ravi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.No.18874 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.55201 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This petition has been filed to accept the cause title in the above appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Death extract of the first claimant Ganesan S/o. Murugesan is produced. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered. 03.09.2025 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- Next ›
- Last »