Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Radhika vs D.Vaithiyanathan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN R.Radhika Petitioner Vs D.Vaithiyanathan Respondent PRAYER Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 to withdrawal of the suit in H.M.O.P.No. 60 of 2022 from the file of the Principal Sub Judge Court, Viruthachalam and transfer the same to the Sub Judge Court at Poonamallee. For Petitioner: Mr.D.YogeswaranORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.60 of 2022 pending on the file of the Sub-Court, Viruthachalam and transfer the same to the file of the Sub-Court, Poonamallee. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the H.M.O.P No.60 of 2022 has been disposed of on 11.09.2023 itself. 4.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives in this petition and the same is dismissed as infructuous. No cos...
State of Tamil Nadu vs S. Ashok
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.No.6047 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.31264 of 2025R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.This miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of theorder dated 18.12.2024 made inW.P.No.14688 of 2023. Perusing the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and being satisfied with the same, this miscellaneous petition is ordered on condition that the certified copy of theorder shall be produced as and when it ismade ready. (R.S.K., J) (H.C., J) 03.09.2025 drm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Abdullah Sarwar vs Authorised Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Abdullah Sarwar : PetitionerversusAuthorised Officer, SARB, State Bank of India, rep. By its Assistant General manager, Red Cross Buildings, 32, Red Cross Road, Egmore Chennai 600008 : Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus appointing an independent chartered accountant at petitioner's cost, which petitioner is willing to pay for arriving at the true picture and status of correct and legitimate outstanding dues payable towards respondents return of title deeds any other appropriate writ or order or direction. For Petitioner : Mr.Abdullah Sarwar Petitioner-in-person For Respondent : Mr.M.L.GaneshORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) In compliance of the order passed by this Court earlier, a memo has been su...
Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Vs The Inspector General of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Postgraduate Teachers' Association, Registration No.160/1980, Rep. by its Secretary, R.Srinivasan, No.159, Gengu Reddy Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Petitioner Vs. 4.The Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Postgraduate Teachers' Association, Rep. by its President, R.Ilangovan, No.14, Seethalakshmi Nagar, Thondi Nagar, 6th Cross, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Page No.1 of 4Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring for the registration of the fourth respondent association in Registration Certificate No.63 of 2012 issued by the third respondent herein as invalid and against the provisions of Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. For Petitioner : Ms.Suneetha for M/s.S.Surekha For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu, AGP, [R1-R3] Mr.K.Thilageswaran [R4] ****...
Loganathan vs Sekar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and CMP.No.7810 of 2023 LOGANATHAN Petitioner Vs1. SEKAR2.Kannan 3.Hemalatha 4.Sathishkumar 5.Lalitha 6.Govindammal 7.Pongavanam 8.Shantha 9.Rani 10.Padma 11.Seetharaman 12.Govindan 13.Parthasarathy 14.Venkatesan 15.Santhanam 16.Thavamani 17.Prabhakaran 18.Lakshmipathi @ Lakshmanan 19.Radha 20.Amaravathi 21.Mohana 22.Ganesh 23.Gomathi 24.Amutha 25.Vijayalakshmi 26.Devi 27.T. Selvam 28.SARAVANAN 29.Thulasi 30.T. Sheela 31.Roja 32.Raja 33.M. Sasikala 34.Minor. Kaviya 35.Minor. Ranjith (32 respondent is the Natural Guardian of 34 and 35 respondents) Respondents PRAYER Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 to withdraw and transfer the suit in O.S.No. 102 of 2022 on the file of the District Munsif Court at Vanthavasi to District Munsif Curt at Chengalpattu. For Petitioner: Mr.D.S.Ramesh For Respondents: Mr.K.G.Senthilkumar For R1ORDERT...
G.Venkatesh Vs State, Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN G.Venkatesh ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep. by: The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.236 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending in C.C.No.876 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned II Additional Special Judge, Special Court for EC & NDPS Act, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Subburaj For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect.Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.drl2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 03.09.2025 drl To 1.The II Additional Special Judge, Special Court for EC & N...
Manoj Vs State Rep By The Inspector Of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Manoj ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep by The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.19 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.19 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : No representation For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.01.2025 for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109 & 103 of BNS Act, in Crime No.19 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail.Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.rpl2. This is a second bail petition filed by the petitioner. However, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is taken up for hearing.3. The case pertains to a retaliatory act following an earlier murder. It is allege...
G.Muneer vs the Tamil Nadu Waqf Board
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 01.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.11282 & 11283 of 2025 G.Muneer ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Rep. by its Chairman, 3.Syed Sha Mohammedin Kirmani Tomb Waqf, Rep. by Muthawalli, Veppur Village, Vellore Main Road, Arcot Taluk 632 509, Ranipet District. ... Respondents Page No.1 of 4 Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records of the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent dated 23.01.2025 in Na.Ka.No.826/23/AA7/Vlr and quash the same as illegal, unsustainable in so far as the claim of the petitioner to recognise proper person as hereditary Muthawalli. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Siva Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Haja Mohideen Gisthi [R1 & R2] *****ORDERThis matter is listed today under the caption ''for withdrawal'' based on the request made by the learned c...
D.Rubin Jaya Thilak Vs The Assistant Registrar (Law)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR W.M.P. No.10842 of 2022 in W.P.No. 11280 of 2022 D.Rubin Jaya Thilak ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Assistant Registrar (Law) State Human Rights Commission No.143, Kumarasamy Raja Salai Greenways Road, Annamalaipuram Chennai - 600 0282. J.Jerlin ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. A.D.Banupriya for Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents : No appearanceORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of original 'complaint in S.H.R.C.No.7743 of 2019 dated 23.12.2019' [hereinafter 'impugned complaint' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].2. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that theimpugned complaint was filed in the connected writ petition. Learned couns...
Sundaram Clayton Limited vs the Asst. Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR and W.M.P.No.11990 of 2025 Sundaram-Clayton Limited, Thally Road, Belagondapalli, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District-635 114 rep. by its Authorised Signatory ... Petitioner Vs.1.The Assistant Superintendent of Police, Hosur Sub Division, Krishnagiri District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mathigiri Circle, Mathigiri-635 110. 3.K.Loganathan 4.S.Meenakshi ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to provide adequate police protection for ingress and egress of vehicles, men and material from in and out of the factory premises and further vacate thetrespassing persons by ensuring that no striking persons assemble illegally in any form within the radius of 500 meters from petitioner's factories namely, Sundaram Clayton, Die Casting Division, Belagondapalli, Tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »