Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Subbachari vs Smita Kelton Shah
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Subbachari ... Appellant Vs. Smita Kelton Shah ... Respondent Prayer: Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 of CPC, to set aside the impugned order dated 28.03.2024 in I.A.No.5 of 2023 in O.S.No.153 of 2023 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur. For Appellant : Mr.Aashish Jain Lunia For Respondent : Mr.P.MurugesanORDERThe present appeal has been filed, challenging the order in I.A.No.5 of 2023 under Section 96 of CPC. The said I.A.No.5 of 2023 was filed for rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC. 2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Hosur, in and by order dated 28.03.2024, has allowed I.A.No.5 of 2023 and thereby, the plaint in O.S.No.153 of 2023 has been rejected, as against which, the present appeal suit has been preferred.3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the counsel, who was engaged by the app...
Kamala Vs Senthilkumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
C.M.P.No.19536 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.16497 of 2024R.KALAIMATHI, J.This petition has been filed to accept the cause title in the appeal. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 3.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this civil miscellaneous petition is ordered. 04.09.2025 Mac https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
V.Palanisamy Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.12798, 12796 & 12804 of 2019 W.P.No.12530 of 2019 V.Paalanisamy ... Petitioner Vs Salem. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order in Na.Ka.No.14835/2017/Aa2 dated 21.12.2017 of the 2nd respondent, and to quash the same. Page No:1/6 W.P.No.12536 of 2019 V.Paalanisamy ... Petitioner Vs Salem. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Namakkal. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruchengodu 5.The District Superintendent of Police, Thiruchengodu, 6.The Inspector of Police, Kumarapalayam Police Station, Namakkal District. ... Respondents Page No:2/6PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the repsondents herein to return and hand over the keys of A/m.Kariakali...
G. Chanduru vs T. Malaiperumal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI G.Chanduru ...Petitioner Vs. 1.T.Malaiperumal 2.The Divisional Manager, M/s.New India Assurance Company, No.179, IIIrd Floor, TB HuB, Nehru Street, Puducherry. 3.M.Saravanan 4.The Divisional Manager, M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited, TB HUB, No.35, 36, Balaji Nagar, New Saram, Puducherry 13. ...Respondents Prayer :- Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tindivanam to number the unnumbered claim application in MCOP.FNo.MCOP/830/2022, MCOP SR No.6272 of 2022 dated 31.01.2023 on the file of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Tindivanam and allow the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.SritharORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner states that relief sought for in this Revision Petition has become infructuous since the MCOP petition has been numbered.2...
V. Mani Vs Narayan Moorthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR V.Mani ... Petitioner vs. Narayan Moorthy The Tahsildar, Vanur Taluk, Villupuram District ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish Respondent for his willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.30599 of 2024 on the date of 18.10.2024. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Srimathi For Respondent : Mr.G.Velu Additional Government PleaderORDERWhen the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, Mr.G.Velu, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondent based on written instructions from respondent in his Proceedings in Ci.Pa.A9/88/2024, dated 14.06.2025, would submit that pursuant to the direction issued in the main writ petition, the subject property was surveyed on 05.12.2024 by the respondent and report has been filed to Revenue Divisional Officer, Villupuram. A copy of the said or...
P.Ganesan, vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY P.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd Respondent to depute a competent surveyor to make survey to the petitioners land in Survey No. 280/3A which is situated at Kattukkottai, Nainarpalaiyam, 1st Ward, Paithur Village and Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District ad consequently to direct the 3rd respondent to give police protection to the Surveyor for the Survey of the Petitioners land For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramanan, for Mr.R.Naresh Kumar For Respondent : Ms.S.Indhubala, AGP for R1 & 2 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, GA, for R3ORDERThis writ petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to depute a competent surveyor to make survey at the petitioners land.2. When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedAdditional Government Pleader and the...
Arul Prasanth Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Arul Prasanth(M/24) S/o Mani No.6/137, Ekuppichi Palayam, Ugainur Post, Thirupur. ..Petitioner/Accused/versus/The State rep.by Inspector of Police, NIB CID Chennai P.S. (Crime No.54 of 2024) ..Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.54 of 2024 on the file of the respondent polie. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Moovendhan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar. Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.11.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c)r/w 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Crime No.54 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner herein was arrested in connection with...
Saint Jean Camala(Deceased) vs Djayagoby
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
C.M.P.Nos.11240, 11243 and 11247 of 2024 in S.A.No.458 of 2010S.SOUNTHAR,J.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/appellants.2. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, C.M.P.Nos.11240, 11243 and 11247 of 2024 are ordered.3. The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment and list the second appeal on 24.09.2025. 03.09.2025 (3/3) dm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Banumathy Vs R. Lakshmi Kutty (Died) 1. N. Surendaran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
S.SOUNTHAR,J., This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to implead the 18th Respondent herein as 19th Respondent in First Appeal in A.S.No.410 of 2007.2. The notice to the proposed 18th respondent/P.Latha is served and her name appeared in the cause-list.3. Mr.Su.Srinivasan, learned counsel takes notice for the proposed 18threspondent and he would submit that he received vakalat for 18th respondent and the same was filed before the Registry. He further submitted that in view of Doctrine of Lis Pendens, the impleading application need not be allowed and any decree passed in the first appeal will bind the 18th respondent.4. The 1st respondent settled the property to the 18th respondent pendingfirst appeal. Even though the alienation in favour of the 18th respondent, is hit by Doctrine of Lis Pendens. In the case on hand, already the impleading application has been filed and notice was also served on the proposed party/alinee. Having regard to nature of decree challenged in this a...
K.S.Anandan, Vs The District Revneue Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-03-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 03.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.897 of 2019 and WMP.No.1009 & 11372 of 2019 K.S.Anandan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur 2.The Tahsildar, Ponneri Taluk, Tiruvallur District 3.S.B.Gandhi(third respondent impleaded as per orderdated 03.09.2025 made in WMP.No.23596 of 2019 in WP.No.897 of 2019) ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.28881/2017/A3 dated 29.11.2018 and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Srimathi For Respondents For R1 & 2 : Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Additional Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.S.UdhayakumarORDERThis writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the first respondent dated 29.11.2018 thereby rejecting the request of the petitioner seeking d...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »