Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Assets Care and Reconstruction Enterprises Limited vs Prafful Overseas ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-08-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 08-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Arb O.P(COM.DIV.) No. 189 of 2025 AND OA NO. 255 OF 2025, ARB APPLN NO. 451 OF 2025, ARB APPLN NO. 450 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 452 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 453 OF 2025,ARB APPLN NO. 449 OF 2025 Assets Care And Reconstruction Enterprises Limited A Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 Registered as as Asset Reconstruction Company under Section 3 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Having its registered Office at.14th Floor, Eros Corporate Towers, Nehru Palace, New Delhi-110019. And Corporate Office at 502, C.Wing, one BKC, Bandra Kurala Complex, Mumbai-400051. (Amended as per Order dt.17.6.2025 in Appln.No.2648 of 2025) Petitioner (s) Vs1. Prafful Overseas Private LimitedA Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 Having its registered office at 349, 1st Floor, Naya Katra, Chandni Chowk, New Delhi 110006. Also having its corporate office 101-102, Sagar Shopping Centre, Sahar D...
T.Rajkumar vs the Superintendent of Prison
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-08-2025
C.M.P.NoS.9225 & 9230 of 2025 in Rev.Appl.Nos.156188 and 155810 ofR.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP.B.BALAJI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 4 and 5 days in filing the above Review Applications.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.V.Manoharan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and he has no serious objection in allowing the petitions.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions, these petitions are ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the Review Applications and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise inorder.[R.S.K., J.] [P.B.B., J.] 08.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Andal (Died), J. Saroja (Died) 1. Adhikesavan vs Venkatesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-08-2025
This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to condone the delay of 653 days in filing the petition for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent/ J.Saroja in S.A.No.167 of 2019.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/ respondents and perused the records.3. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants and however the notice in this regard has already been served on the appellants.4. Having accepted the reasons stated in the affidavit, filed in supportof this petition to condone the delay of 653 days in filing the petition for setting aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent/ J.Saroja in S.A.No.167 of 2019 is allowed. stn5. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 08-09-2025 (1/2) stn...
The Principal Secretary to Government Vs P.Aruchamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-08-2025
C.M.P.No.9834 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.58873 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDHEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 251 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Ms.T.Saranya for M/s.JerryV.V.Sundar takes notice for the first respondent. She has no serious objection in allowing the petition. Second respondent, though served, has not entered appearance.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [H.C., J.] 08.09.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
G.BHARATH Vs V.Vaishnavi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-08-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 08.09.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and CMP.Nos.10808 & 10809 of 2025 Mr.G.Bharath ... Petitioner vs. Mrs.V.Vaishnavi ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking to withdraw the M.C.No.81 of 2025 pending on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Tirupathur and transfer the same to the Family Court at Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kathiresan For Respondent : Mr.M.ArunORDERThis petition has been filed to withdraw M.C.No.81 of 2025, pending on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Tirupathur and transfer the same to the file of the Family Court at Chennai.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is working in CentralGovernment in Food Safety and Standard Authority of India (FSSAI) as Technical Officer at Gujarat. The marriage between the petitioner and the respondent/Wife was solemnized on 14.02.2022 at Vellore as per the Hindu Rites...
C.Chandran vs M/S.Madras Lakshmi Finance P
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR in A.S.No.130 of 2004 C.Chandran S/o Chengali Naicker, No. 30-a, Perumal Koil St, Konambedu, Ayappakkam Post, Chennai -77 Appellant(s) Vs M/s.Madras Lakshmi Finance P Ltd, Rep By Its Chairman, Chennai 40, 2-101, Ii Avenue, Anna Nagar, Ch-40 and 3 Others Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.M.A.Abdul Wahab For Respondent(s): M/s.Pathy & Pathy for R1ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to ordersubstituted service to the respondents 2 to 4 by affixture on CNB & LKR(2) by publication in one issue of Malai Sudar. S.SOUNTHAR.J2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in support of this petition, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.4. The petitioner/appellant is permitted to effect substituted service of the respondents 2 to 4 by paper publication for the hearing da...
V.Saravanakumar vs Thangavelu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
C.M.P.No. 11803 of 2025 And S.A.No. 175 of 1994V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.The petitioner's vendor is a party to the suit. The suit is one for partition. Being persons claiming under a defendant in the suit, they are proper parties. Hence, the CMP is ordered.2. Office is directed to implead the petitioners as respondent Nos. 13 to 18 in S.A.No. 175 of 1994.3. post on 09.09.2025. 04.09.2025 vsg https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
T.Mohanraj Vs The District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.1231 & 1232 of 2025 T.Mohanraj .. Petitioner Vs. 6.Thirumoorthy @ Rathinasamy 7.Rajammal. 8.Devagi 9.Srilatha 10.Thangammal ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus after calling for the entire records relating to the 1st Respondent's impugned Revision Proceedings Na.Ka.99/2015/C1 dated 24.07.2017 and quash the same and further directing the 3rd Respondent to delete the names of the 8th, 9th and 10th Respondents in Patta No.1080, in respect of Survey Nos.146/1, 147/2 abd Coimbatore District, so as to restore the same in its original position as in Patta No.1080, within the stipulated time may be fixed by this Honourable High Court.For petitioner : Mr. J.Agni Selvaraju For R-1to R-3 : Mr. S.Jayachandran, Government Advocate For R-4 : Notice not in ready For R-5, R-6 & ...
P.Cholaraja vs the Govt. of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 04.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.Nos.22553, 22599, 25092 of 2012 and 13132 of 2018 P.CHOLARAJA Petitioner in W.P.No.22553 of 2012 K.RAHAVAN Petitioner in W.P.No.22599 of 2012 M/S NELLAI TUTICORIN NADAR MAGAMAI PARIPALANA SANGAM REP BY ITS SECRETARY NO.22/488, PANTHEON ROAD, EGMORE CHENNAI 600 008 Petitioner in W.P.No.25092 of 2012 K.KAMARAJ NADAR Petitioner in W.P.No.13132 of 2018Versus3. THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES (MADRAS-CENTRAL), NO.182 BHARATHI SALAI, ROYAPETTAH,4. THE NELLAI THOOTHUKUDI NADAR ... Respondents in W.P.No.22553 of 2012 REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-93. DISTRICT REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION) MADRAS-CENTRAL, NO.182 BHARATHI SALAI, ROYAPETTAH,4. THE NELLAI THOOTHUKUDI NADAR ... Respondents in W.P.No.22599 of 20123. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION) MADRAS-CENTRAL, NO.182 BHARATHI SALAI, ROYAPETTAH,4. P.CHOLARAJA ... Respondents in W.P.No.25092...
TMT KAMATCHI NAVEEN (Deceased) 1.Mr.Gaurav and 3 others Vs Mr.K.V.Jais ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-04-2025
A.No.3626 of 2024 in CS.NO.860 of 2007Dr.R.N.MANJULA, J.The Commissioner's report has been filed.2. The learned counsel for the plaintiff has got no objection to the Commissioner's report. 3.Let the matter be called on 07.10.2025. 19.09.2025 jrs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »