Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sasikala Vs Ravichandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-23-2025
in This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 283 days in filing the appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The learned counsel for the second respondent does not have serious objections in allowing the petition.4. The first petitioner would aver that due to the sudden demise ofher husband, who was the sole bread winner and taking care of the family, she has been struggling to take care of her needs and meet day-to-day expenses. Hence, the delay of 283 days occurred in filing the appeal.5. The reasons assigned by the petitioner in the affidavit appear tobe reasonable and acceptable. Therefore, this Court is inclined to allow this petition, subject to the condition that the interest for the delay period of 283 days shall stand waived. kmm kmm in...
R.Makesh Babu vs R.Asokan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.R.P.No.445 of 2024 and R.Makesh babu S/o.Late.Rajendren Door.No.3-A, 2bd road, Ramakrishna Puram, Coimbatore - 641 002. ... PetitionerVersusR.Asokan S/o.B.Ramadass Door No:102, Ramanujam Road West, R.S.Puram, Coimbatore ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, pleased to strike out the plaint in C.O.S.No.87 of 2023 on the Commercial Court/Principal District Judge, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : No appearance *********M. JOTHIRAMAN, J.nviORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing on 04.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was adjourned on 18.09.2025. On 18.09.2025, again there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, and the matter was adjourned to today (i.e.,19.09.2025) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the p...
Tamilkodi Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR Tamilkodi .. Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its SecretaryChennai 600 006. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by the first respondent vide Lr.No.11796/SE3(2)/2018 dated 14.08.2018 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to conduct the Special Eligibility Test for appointment to the post of Graduate Teachers Government Schools and other Schools etc. For Petitioner : Mr.P.ChandrasekaranFor Respondents : M/s.A.Bakkiyalakshmi Government AdvocateORDERLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to tha...
R.Karthipan Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
2025:MHC:2344IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ AND CMP Nos. 5068, 5073 & 5081 of 2023 1.R.Karthipan Appellant(s) in WA No.532/2023 2.R.Venkatesa Ramanathan Appellant in WA No.534/2023 3.R.Chandramohan Appellant in WA No.535/2023 Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Highways Department and Minor port, secretariat, Chennai. 2.The District Collector Thiruvarur. 3.The Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition) Page No.1 of 5 Chennai-Kanyakumari Industrial, Corridor Project (SH-66), Kumbakonam 612 001. 4.The Commissioner of Land Administration (FAC) Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. Respondent(s) WA No. 532 of 2023order of this Court in WP No.559 of 2021 dated 27.08.2022.WA No. 534 of 2023order of this Court in WP No.18073 of 2020 dated 27.08.2022.WA No. 535 of 2023order of this Court in WP No.1598 of 2021 dated 27.08.2022.For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Naveen For Respondent(s): ...
N. Devika Vs T.udayachandran and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.09.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY N.Devika .. PetitionerVersus1.Mr.T.Udhayachandran, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, 2.Mr.C.Nedunchezhian, The Principal Accountant General (A & E), 3.Dr.K.A.Senthil Velan (in charge), The Additional Director General of Police(Intelligence), Chennai - 600 004. .. Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order made in W.P.No.7933 of 2022 dated 27.06.2024 and pass such other suitable orders. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan Additional Advocate General Assisted by V.P.R.Ilamparithi Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R3ORDERThis contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order made in W.P.No.7933 of 2022 dated 27.06.2024.2. It is submitted that the writ appeal has been preferred...
Periyasamy Padayachi (Died) vs the Executive Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA1. Periyasamy Padayachi (died) S/o. Muthusamy Padayachi, Periamanakudi Vadakku Theru Via Kallakurichi Ariyalur Taluk.2. PACHIAMMAL W/o Periyasamy Padayachi3. MATHIAZHAGAN S/o Periyasamy Padayachi Both Residing At Periamanakudi,vadakku Theru,(via) Kallakurichi, Ariyalur Dist-4. ARIVAZHAGI W/o Rajaraman D/o Periyasamy Padayachi Kolanthukurichi Melatheru Ramapuram Post, Kattumannarkudi Division , Cuddalore District 5.Appellants 2 To 4 Brought On Records As Lrs Deceased Sole Appellant Vide Order Of Court Dated 30/06/15 Made In Mp 1 To 3/15 In Sa 504/09 Appellant(s) Vs1. The Executive Director2.GOVINDASAMY S/o. Sellamuthu Padayachi, 3.SELVAM S/o. Govindasamy, Hasthinapuram 4.KASINATHAN S/o. Sellamuthu Padyaachi, 5.ELANGOVAN S/o. Kasinathan, Hasthinapuram 6.Mayilerum Perumal S/o. Kandasamy Padayachi, Manakkudi Village, Ariyalur Taluk. 7.RAVICHANDRAN S/o. Mayilerumperumal, Manakkudi Taluk, Ariy...
The Deputy Commissioner (Ct)-1 vs Tamilnadu Petroproducts Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
C.M.P.No.2275 of 2025 in W.A.Sr.No.30877 of 2023S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.andMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 663 days in re- presenting the above appeal.2. In view of the reasonsassigned in the accompanying affidavit, filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 663 days in re-presenting the above appeal is condoned. (S.M.S.,J.) (M.S.Q.,J.) 22.09.2025 dsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
J.Vishnupriya vs S.Harshavardhan Harsith
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Tr.CMP.No.115 of 2024 and J.Vishnupriya W/o.Hashavardhan Harsith No.70/19, Ramakrishna Road, Salem. ... PetitionerVersusS.Harshavardhan Harsith, S/o.Sekar, No.12-38, Vaigai Nagar, Kovaipudhur, Coimbatore-641 042. ... Respondent Prayer:- Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the CPC, to withdraw H.M.O.P.No.1605 of 2022 pending on the file of The Principal Judge, Family Court, Coimbatore and transfer the same to The Family Court, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nileshram - No appearance ************M. JOTHIRAMAN, J.nviORDERWhen the matter came up for hearing on 18.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was adjourned today (i.e.,19.09.2025) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed f...
T.Veerasamy vs the Inspector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And T.Veerasamy ... Petitioner Vs.(R2 impleaded vide Court orderdt. 02/01/2019, made in MP.1/14 in WP.35443/07 by RMDJ) ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the file of the respondent made in reference Vi.Pa.No: 1/196 dated .10.2007 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gokula Krishnan for M/s.B.Kumaraswamy For Respondents : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the file of the respondent made in reference Vi.Pa.No: 1/196 dated .10.2007 and quash the same. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court may, without going into the merits of the case, grant liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. 3.This writ petition...
V.Srinivasan vs the Inspector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-22-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And V.Srinivasan ... Petitioner Vs. Coimbatore 641 018. ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the file of the respondent made in reference Vi.Pa.No: 1/196 dated .10.2007 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Gokula Krishnan for M/s.B.Kumaraswamy For Respondent : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the file of the respondent made in reference Vi.Pa.No: 1/196 dated .10.2007 and quash the same. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed this writ petition challenging the eviction notice issued by the Bhoothan Board. This Court may, without going into the merits of the case, grant liberty to the petitioner to canvass all the points before t...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »