Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 23 2025

U.Elumalai, vs the District Collector(Rural)

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 23.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K.SURENDER U.Elumalai ... Petitioner VsVellore District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to include the petitioner's name in the panel of Assistants, drawn for promotion as Deputy Block Development Officer, Vellore District 2012-2013 as per the first respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A2/2673/2012 dated 15.06.2012 and fit him in the appropriate serial on the basis of the petitioner's seniority.For Petitioner : Mr.G.Jeremiah For Respondents : Ms.R.L.Karthika Government Advocate for R1ORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court that the above writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.2. Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and theen...


Sep 23 2025

K.Senthilkumar Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 23.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.No.10587 of 2023 K.Senthilkumar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirupur District, Tirupur - 641 601. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Tirupur, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupur Revenue Division, 4.The Tahsildar, Avinasi Taluk, Tirupur District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2022 and to restore the patta in name of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Ganesan, Government AdvocateORDERThe relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2022 and to restore the patta in name of the petitioner.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner took...


Sep 23 2025

K.Dhandapani Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 23.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and W.M.P.No.10585 of 2023 K.Dhandapani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirupur District, Tirupur - 641 601. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Tirupur, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupur Revenue Division, 4.The Tahsildar, Avinasi Taluk, Tirupur District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2022 and to restore the patta in name of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar For Respondents : Mr.P.Ganesan, Government AdvocateORDERThe relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2022 and to restore the patta in name of the petitioner.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner took a ...


Sep 23 2025

G.S.Bhuvanesh Khanna vs the Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN G.S.Bhuvanesh Khanna ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director of Medical Education, No.162, EVR Periyar Salai, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010. (Near KMC Hospital) 3.The Medical Services Recruitment Board, Represented by its Member Secretary, 7th Floor, DMS Building, 355, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 006. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Declaration, declaring that the options given by the petitioner for question Nos.26,36,51,53,73,86 and 98 (in thepetitioner's question book series) are correct and accordingly direct the respondents to award the petitioner with marks for the said answers by appointing a Expert Committee to evaluate corrections of the key answers and select and appoint the petitioner to post of Assista...


Sep 23 2025

R.Srinivasan Vs The inspector General of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR and W.M.P.No.6024 of 2019 R.Srinivasan .. Petitioner vs 1.The Inspector General of Police Coimbatore -641 017. 2.The Commandant, 3.O.J.Mathew, Deputy Commandant (Enquiry Officer) 4.SI/GD Gopalakrishnan, (Presiding Officer)5.Deputy Inspector General of Police GC, CRPF, New Vellanur, Avadi Tamil Nadu 600 065. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records on the file of the 2nd respondent vide proceedings in No.P.VIII- the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with full back wages from the date of suspension. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Udhayasuriyan For Respondents : Mr.V.Ashok Kumar CGSCORDERAfter arguing the matter at full length, on the learned counsel for the respondents pointing out to this Court that the petitioner instead of filing appeal as...


Sep 23 2025

C.BALARAMAN Vs A.Rishikumar,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

CMP.No.14944 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.21655 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 210 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 210 days is hereby condoned. 23.09.2025 kmm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Sep 23 2025

J.Latha Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 23.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE K.SURENDER and WMP.Nos.6690 & 6691 of 2018 J.Latha ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Additional Chief Secretary Department of School Education (C2) Fort St.George, Madras 600 009. 2.The Director of School Education DPI Campus College Road, Chennai 600 006. 3.The Chief Educational Officer Office of the Chief Educational Officer Government Boys Higher Secondary School Campus Gandhi Road, Krishnagiri 635 001. 4.The District Educational Officer District Education Office Krishnagiri 635 001. 5.The Correspondent St. Anne's Higher Secondary School Krishnagiri 635 001 Krishnagiri District. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 22.11.2017 entered in the TSR of the petitioner, by the 4th respondent, in respect o...


Sep 23 2025

Nuzhath Banu Vs the secretary

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P.No.5212 of 2022 Nuzhath Banu .... Petitioner Vs Guindy, Chennai. .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to follow the rule of reservation under the BCM for 3.5 or to allot the seat for the petitioner for M.Phil.Psychology. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Charless Muthu Shanthan For R1 : Mrs.M.Sneha For R2 : Mr.K.Tippu Sultan Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.G.ArumugamORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to follow the rule of reservation under the Backward Class Muslim (BCM) category, to the extent of 3.5% and consequently to allot a seat to the petitioner in the M.Phil.Psychology course.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuo...


Sep 23 2025

Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, vs Selvi.J.Jayalalitha,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 and 1 of 2014 Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Rep. By Its Treasurer, M.K.Stalin, DMK Head Quarters, Anna Arivalayam, No.367 And 369, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai-18. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Selvi.J.Jayalalitha, The Honourable Chief Minister Of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Rep. By Its General Secretary, No.226, Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Royapettah, Chennai-14. 3.Thiru.V.Senthil Balaji, Honourable Minister For Transport, 4.The Chief Secretary, 5.The Principal Secretary Transport Department, Government Of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 6.The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (chennai) Division Ltd, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-2. 7.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Villupuram, Rep. By Its Managing Director, Villupuram.8.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam, Kum...


Sep 23 2025

B.Muthaiya Vs Union Govt of India

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Sep-23-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR B.Muthaiya .. Petitioner vs 1.Union Government of India, Represented by Secretary, Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent order dated 17.09.2018 which is made in Letter No.HSC2/214-2/2018 and quash the same, consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to recommend his name for conferred Indian Police Service to the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondents : No appearance for R1 Mrs.V.Yamuna Devi for R2 Special Government PleaderORDERToday, this writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal' and when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner inspite of the matter being passed over.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also filed a Memo dated 09.09.2025 stati...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial