Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jothilakshmi vs Selvaraj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR Jothilakshmi ... Appellant -vs- Selvaraj ... Respondent PRAYER : Appeal against the judgment and decree, dated 01.10.2004, passed in H.M.O.P.No.45 of 2003, by Family Court, Coimbatore. For Appellant : Ms.M.VidyaJUDGMENT(By Dr.G.Jayachandran,J.) H.M.O.P.No.45 of 2003, the petition filed by wife for divorce under Section 13 (1) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, on the file of Family Court, Coimbatore, was contested by respondent - husband, along with an application, seeking interim custody of his minor son.2. The Court below, after appreciating the evidence, finding thatpetitioner - wife had not made out a case of cruelty and desertion, dismissed the divorce petition. In so far as the custody of the child, after observing that the child was with petitioner and she being the natural guardian and was taking care of the child, th...
Vijaya Raghavendra vs M/S.Tony Cinemax
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-09-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Vijaya Raghavendra All In Picture-producer, Door No.3c, Balaji Apartment 5th Cross Street, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035. ..Petitioner Vs ..Respondents PRAYER This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 10.12.2021 made in IA.No.3 of 2021 in OS.No. 6355 of 2021 on the file of the VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner: No appearance For RR4 & 5: No appearanceORDERWhen the matter came up before this Court on 17.09.2025, this Court observed as follows:- No representation for the Revision Petitioner. 2.List the matter on 26.09.2025 under the caption, 'for dismissal'. 2.Today also there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation: Yes/No GS...
Reshma Parveen MD Vs State Bank of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Reshma Parveen MD Petitioner(s) Vs1. State Bank of India Rep. by The Branch Manager, Vanagaram Branch No.61, Radhae Shyam Complex, Vanagaram Ambattur Salai, Vanaaram, Chennai-600 095. 2.State Bank of India Rep. By The Chief General Manager, Corporate Centre, IV Floor, State Bank Bhawan, Madame Cama Road, Mumbai-400 021. Respondent(s)PRAYER; The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to open and operate the Locker bearing Account No. 00000031094743026 (Locker No. B1/2) situated in the 1st respondents bank consisting of valuable things belongs to the petitioner without any restriction forthwith. For Petitioner(s): S.Muthuselvan No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Bharathidasan for M/s.M.L.Ganesh, Standing CounselORDERWhen the Matter was listed for hearing on 18.09.2025, ther...
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION Vs Holy Angels Matric Higher Sec ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
C.M.P.No.931 of 2025 in CMA.SR.No.3509 of 2025R.KALAIMATHI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 119 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The learned counsel for the second respondent/Insurance Company has no serious objection in allowing this petition.4. The petitioner would aver that due to administrative exigencies beyond their control, delay of 119 days occurred in preferring the civil miscellaneous appeal.5. The reasons assigned by the petitioner in the affidavit appear to be reasonable and acceptable. Therefore, this Court is inclined to allow this petition. 26.09.2025 kkd Note :Registry to print the name of Mr.C.R.Prasanna, learned counsel for the second respondent in the cause list. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Thillaigovindhan vs Ranganathan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE1. Thillaigovindhan2. Prakash3. Sundaramoorthi4. Vimala5. Thilagam ... Petitioners Vs.1. Ranganathan2. Perumal3. Aandal4. Mohan5. G.Usharani6. V.Arvindugar ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order XLI Rule 5 and Section 151 of CPC, to pass an order of stay of all further proceedings of For Petitioners : Mr.M.Nandhakumar for M/s.Eswar, Kumar and Rao For Respondents : Mr.N.Suresh for R1, R2 Served R3 to R6DR. A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.gvORDERThis Petition is filed seeking an order of stay of all further proceedings of2. It is seen from the records that the services have been completed in theappeal. Since the main appeal is ripe for final hearing, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 26.09.2025 () gv To The learned I Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Villupuram....
K.Ramalingam Vs M.S.Prasath, I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI K.Ramalingam S/o.Kuppusamy, No.17, Old Police Line Street, Thiyagadhurugam, Kallakurichi Taluk, Kallakurichi District.Petitioner(s) Vs M.S.Prasath, I.A.S., The District Collector, Collectorate, Kallakuruchi, Kallakuruchi District. Contemnor(s) PRAYER Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondent for deliberately disobeying the order of this Honble Court WP.No.12833 of 2024 dated 03/06/2024. For Petitioner: Ms.K.Varsha For Respondent: Mrs.S.Anitha, Special Government PleaderORDERFor non-compliance of the order of this Court, dated 03.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.12833 of 2024, the Contempt Petition is filed.2. When the Contempt Petition was taken up for hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that theorder of this Court, dated 03.06.2024 passed in W.P.No.12833 of 2024, has beencomplied with and the copy ...
C.Sundaram, Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN C.Sundaram S/o Chinnapaiyan Head Constable 851 Formerly PEW, Namakkal District, Now serving at Namakkal Town P.S., Namakkal District. .. Petitioner/versus/1.The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem Range, Salem. 3.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 4. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in PR.No.17/G1/2009 u/r 3(b) dated 10.12.11 and confirmed by the 2nd respondent in RC No.B1/15958/2008; Appeal No.04/2012 dated 01.02.12 and quash the same and grant such other further relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.For Petitioner :Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents :Mr.P.Bal...
Sakthivelu Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Sakthivelu, S/o Natesan, Head Constable 873, Formerly PEW, Namakkal District, Now serving at Velukurichi P.S., Namakkal District. .. Petitioner/versus/1.The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal District. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem Range, Salem. 3.The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 4. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the 1st respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in PR.No.18/G1/2009 u/R 3(b) dated 10.12.11 and confirmed by the 2nd respondent in RC No.B1/15958/2008; Appeal No.03/2012 dated 01.02.12 and quash the same and grant such other further relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.For Petitioner :Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents :Mr.P.Balatha...
M.Veerapillai Vs The Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI M.Veerapillai .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Union of India, Rep. by its Secretary, The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendraprasad Road,2. The Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Jai Singh Road,3. The Chief Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu,4. The Additional Chief Secretary, The Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj,5. The Secretary, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department,6. The Secretary, Law Department,7. The Principal Secretary to Government, BC, MBC & Minorities Welfare Department,8. The Director, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Directorate, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ..RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 30.01.2021 and hear the grievances submitted by t...
A.Venkatesan, Vs Tmt. S.Madumathi, I.A.S., and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ A.Venkataesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.S.Madumathi, I.A.S., The Principal Secretary, 2.S.Kannappan, The Director of School Education, 3.P.Sri Venkatapriya, I.A.S., The Chairman, College Road, Chennai 600 006. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of The Contempt of CourtsAct, 1971 to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the orderdated 10.07.2024 in W.P.No.32218 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents : Mr.J.C.Durairaj, Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2 Mr.R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.C.Kathiravan, Special Government Pleader for R3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Alleging that the order of this Court dated 10.07.2024 made in W.P.No.32218 of 2023 has not been complied with, the present contempt petition has been filed.2. Lea...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »