Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surendran vs Mahavir Plantations
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI SURENDRAN ... Petitioner Vs1. Mahavir PlantationsRep. by its Director Bhansaliu, Silver Bright House, Chullickal Road, Kochi, Kerala 682 005 2.The District Collector 3.The Sub Collector Sub Collector Office, Udhagamandalam 643 001 4.The Tasildhar Taluk Office, Udhagamandalam Taluk, Nilgiris District 643 001 ... Respondents Prayer in CMP No.10189 of 2025 : To grant leave to the petitioner herein to file appeal against the order in W.P.No.12655 of 2021 pronounced on 04.04.2024. Prayer in W.A.SR.No.51381 of 2025 : To set aside the order in W.P.No.12655 of 2021pronounced on 04.04.2024.For Petitioner : Mr.V.Prakash, Senior Counsel for Mr.Mitesh R For Respondents : Mr.C.Vigneswaran - for R1 Mr.Vadivelu Deenadhayalan Additional Government Pleader-for R2 to R4ORDER(Order of the Court was made by R.Suresh Kumar J.) Mr.V.Prakash, lear...
D.Arun vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN D.Arun : Petitionerversus2.D.Ponvel : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to permanently close all the windows and open spaces windows with bricks and cement permanently in the petitioner side area in the four floors building constructed and to remove the last floor building including the handle wall in the four floors building constructed based on the representation dated 13.09.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Arun, Petitioner-in-person For Respondents : Mr.RA. Gopinath, Standing Counsel, for respondent No.1 Mr.M.Balaji, for respondent No.2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The grievances raised in this petition are disputes which are purely civil in nature, involving allegation...
Mareti Srinivasalu Vs The Incometax Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Mareti Srinivasalu No.17, Sriram Nagar Colony, Pallipattu, Chennai-600 113. Appellant(s) Vs The Incometax Officer, International Taxation Ward 2(2), Chennai-600 034. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.R.VijayaraghavanORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on prayer for condonation of delay in representation.2. Upon due consideration, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. List the appeal for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 29.08.2025 sasi...
The Divisional Manager Vs P Murugesan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 61 days in representing the above CMA.SR.No.55011 of 2024.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filling CMA.SR.No.55011 of 2024 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. smn smn in...
Narman Joseph Vs G Cube go Green Global Products Pvt., Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 240 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No.59602 of 2025.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. Therefore, the delay in filling CMA.SR.No.59602 of 2025 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. smn smn in...
The Government of Tamil Nadu, Vs N.Renuka devi,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
C.M.P.No.13907 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.59970 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 298 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Though the sole respondent has been served and her name and address shown in the cause list, none appears for the respondent.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [K.G.T, J.] 29.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The State of Tamilnadu, Vs C.Prakash,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
C.M.P.No.5004 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.137546 of 2023R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 151 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr. S.N.Ravichandran takes notice for the respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [K.G.T., J.] 28.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M. Chandrasekaran vs the Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
in Challenging the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.398 of 2016, the petitioner preferred the above Cross Objections, however there is a delay of 108 days in representing the above Cross Objections arose. Hence, the present petition has been filed to condone the delay in representing the above appeal.2. Mr.J.Mahalingam, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that theabove Cross Objections was returned for rectifying certain defects on 21.12.2023 and again on 07.05.2024, however, the required documents were not get by VI Judge, Court of Small Causes at Chennai and thereafter, papers wer misplaced with other bundles and it could not be traced immediately. Thereafter, after due search, it was traced out. Hence, there is a delay of 108 days arose in representing the above appeal and the said delay caused is neither willful nor wanton, but for the above said reasons. Accordingly, he has filed the above petition.3. Mr.P.Suresh Srinivasan, learned counsel for 1st respondent appeared and raised st...
The Government of Tamil Nadu vs M Chandran
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
C.M.P.No.6071 of 2025 in WA.SR.No.17181 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.Order of the Court was made byR.Suresh Kumar,J.This petition is filed to dispense with the production of original impugned order. Ordered as prayed for. (R.S.K.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 28.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Managing Director Vs Nasreen Taj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CMA SR NO. 122283 OF 2022 The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport, Corporation Limited (Villupuram) Division, Vellore Region Veloore. Appellant(s) Vs1. Nasreen Taj2.Minor. Roshan Jameer (Minor rep by next friend Mother and Natural guardian Nasreen Taj 3.Minor. Hefza (Minor rep by next friend Mother and Natural guardian Nasreen Taj 4.Aseefa 5.Waheeda 6.Syed Khadar 7.Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., No. 570 Nalgaum cross road, Next to Royal Estate Wadala (w) Mumbai - 400 031. Respondent(s) PRAYER To condone the delay of 2515 days in filing the above CMA Sr.No.122283 of For Appellants: Mr. C.R.Sureshkumar For Respondents: RR 1, 4 and 5 - Insufficient Address RR 6 and 7 - Left RR 2 and 3 - Minors (rep. By R1)ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 2515 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award dat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »