Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Commissioner of Income Tax vs the Karur Vysys Bank Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
2025:MHC:2065IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Commissioner Of Income Tax Trichirapalli. .. Appellant in both T.C.(A)s vs The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd., Central Office, Erode Road, Karur 639 002. .. Respondent in both T.C.(A)sCommon Prayer: Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, 'D' Bench, dated 14.07.2006 in ITA Nos.1135&1136/Mds/2003. For Appellant : Mr.V.Mahalingam, Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent : Mr.R.Venkatanarayanan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar PadmanabhanDR. ANITA SUMANTH.,J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR,J.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.V.Mahalingam, learned Senior Standing Counsel, appearing for the appellant/Department would submit that the Income-Tax Department does not wish to pursue these appeals qua assessment periods 1992-93 (T.C.(A) No.664 of 2010) 1993-94 (...
V. Shanthi Vs Vijaya Srinivasan and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU V.Shanthi Petitioner vs. 1.Vijaya Srinivasan 2.Sharath Kumar Srinivasan ...RespondentsPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 232, 255 and 276 of Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of O.S. Rules, praying to grant Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the petitioner as the daughter and the sole legatee and sole beneficiary under the Will having effect limited to the property mentioned in the affidavit of assets and limited to the State of Tamil Nadu.For Petitioner : M/s.Balan Haridas For Respondents : No appearanceORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of the Letters of Administration in respect of the Will dated 29.05.2013 executed by Mr.C.Swaminathan, who died on 24.10.2022. The petitioner is the daughter of the testator, whereas the respondents 1 and 2 are the legal heirs of Late.Mr.S.Srinivasan, the predeceased son o...
S.Balasundararaj vs State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR S.Balasundararaj ...Petitioner Vs. Thiruvannamalai. ...Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Impugned Order in Letter No.38353/A1/2011-4, dated 14.01.12 quash the same and to direct the respondents to confer selection grade and special grade to the petitioner. Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.P.B.Suresh Babu For Respondents : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the Impugned Order in Letter No.38353/A1/2011-4, dated 14.01.12 quash the same and to direct the respondents to confer selection grade and special grade to the petitioner.2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counselfor the petitioner submitted that the regis...
The Secretary Vs The Management
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER The Secretary Tamil Nadu Arasu Pokkuvarathu Kazhaga Thozilalar Podhu Nala Amaippu Sangam, Plot No. 1595, 169A Srinivasa Nagar, 6th Cross street, Thondi Main Road, Sivagangai 630 561. Petitioner(s) Vs The Management Pallavan Salai, Chennai 600 002. Respondent(s) PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the order dated 26.08.2022 passed by the I Additional labour Court, Chennai in O.P.No 266 / 2021 and to quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Santhosh kumar - NO APPEARANCE For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Balaji, Standing Counsel for respondentORDERThis Writ petition was posted for hearing on 14.08.2025. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted today for dismissal. Even today, when the matter came up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this ...
T.Edwin Singh vs the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.Nos.3686 and 3687 of 2024 T.Edwin Singh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its Principal Secretary Department of Higher Education Fort. St. George, Chennai 600009 2.The Anna University of Technology Rep. by its Regional Director Research Regional Office, Tirunelveli 627007 3.The Anna University Rep. by its Director Center for Research Sardar Patel Road, Chennai 600025 ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order vide Lr. No.2011130148/Ph.D/AR13 dated 26.10.2023 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same as illegal and further direct the 3rd respondent to consider the Petitioner's E-Mail representation dated 03.11.2023 and postal representation dated 07.11.2023 and grant such appropriate tim...
G.Sureshkumar Vs The Director of Elementary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and WMP No.11047 of 2018 G.Sureshkumar S/o.G.Gnanamanickam, No.3/452, C-1, Balan Nagar, Paramakudi- 623 707 Ramanathapuram District. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records relating to the charge memo No.Na.Ka.NO.11682/I-4/ 2011 dated 16.06.2011 and the consequentialorder of suspension dated 28.03.2018 in R.C.No.006873/ 14/2018-1 on the fileof the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arasu Ganesan For Respondent : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai Government AdvocateORDERThe Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter, dated 14.08.2025, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. ...
N.Muruganandan vs State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and N.Muruganandan ...Petitioner Vs. Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.3. Dominic Arokiya Mary, Madras Medical College, Chennai 600 003.4. K.Saroja, Madras Medical College, Chennai 600 003. ...Respondents Page No.1 of 4Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Promotion and Posting order passed in Ref.No.44207/N2/2008 dated 28.05.2010 and Ref.No.38088/N2/2013 dated 27.05.2013 both on the file of the 2nd respondent quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner as Lecturer in Medical and Surgical Nursing with effect from 28.05.2010.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaran, Government Advocate for R1 & R2ORDERToday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.K.Jeenath, learned representing counsel for the...
N.Sathyanarayani vs State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and N.Sathyanarayani ...Petitioner Vs. Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.3. G.Shanthi,4. L.Shanthi, Page No.1 of 45. C.Susila Madras Medical College, Chennai 600 003. ...RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Promotion and Posting Order passed in Ref.No.44207/N2/2008 dated 28.05.2010 and Ref.No.38088/N2/2013 dated 27.05.2013 both on the file of the 2nd respondent, quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner as Lecturer in Community Health Nursing with effect from 28.05.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaran, Government Advocate for R1 & R2ORDERIt is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the sole petitioner is no more and inspite of the best ...
G.Priyadharshini vs the Chief Secretary to the
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR G.Priyadharshini ... Petitioner vs 1 The Chief Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, 2 The Home Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, 3 The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police Head Quarters, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai -600 005. 4 The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Anti Dowry Cell, Central Crime Branch, Thousand Lights, Chennai - 600 006. 5 R.V.Varun Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to take appropriate disciplinary action against the 5th respondent consequently suspend him from the service till the disposal of the Criminal Case in Crime No.246 of 2012 on the file of the 4th respondent. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents 1 to 4 : Mr.V.Nanmaran, Addl. Govt. Pleader. For Respondent 5 : Mr.M.Balasubrama...
Brindabok Kumar Ray vs State Rep by Its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Brindabok Kumar Ray ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by its The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.323 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No.323 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vetrivel For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.dnaORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement in the petition to that effect. 2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 21.08.2025 dna To 1.The Judicia...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »