Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jaksan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21.08.2025 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI Jaksan ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District. Crime No. 24/2025 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.C.Christopher Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.Prakash Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.24 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police.ORDER : This Court made the following order :-Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- / TRUE COPY / /2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai - 625 023. p...
Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation vs S. Geetha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
C.M.P.Nos.2139 and 2141 of 2024 in W.A.SR.Nos.165 and 164 of 2024R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDP.DHANABAL, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] These civil miscellaneous petitions have been filed to condone the delay in filing the above writ appeals.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. Mr.N.Subramanian takes notice for the respondents and he has no serious objection in allowing the petitions.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the petitions, these petitions are ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeals and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [P.D.B, J.] 21.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Rathinammal vs Sundaramoorthy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA and CMP.Nos.943, 944 & 945 of 20121. Rathinammal2. Radha Ammal3. Venugopal4. Chokkalingam5. Sankaran6. Valliammal7. Devainai Ammal ... Appellants Vs.1. Sundaramoorthy2. Ayammal3. Ranganayaki4. Saraswathi5. Dhannammal6. Rajamanickammal7. Murugesan8. Madesan9. Mani10. Vasugiammal11. Vijaya ... RespondentsSecond Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 10.01.1995 passed in A.S.No.37 of 1994 passed by the learned Additional Special Judge, Krishnagiri confirming thejudgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Krishnagiri dated30.04.1992 made in O.S.No.811 of 1983. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.C.Jagadish (caveator) for R1 M/s.C.Lakshmi Narain for R1, R4 to R11 R2 diedR3 dismissed vide Court orderdated 07.10.2009JUDGMENTWhen the matter was listed for hearing on 14.08.2025, there was no representation for the a...
M.Muthuraj vs the Chairman Cum Managing Director,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M.Muthuraj ...Petitioner Vs.1. The Chairman Cum Managing Director2. The Chief Engineer (Personnal)3. The Chief Engineer (Distribution) Coimbatore Region Coimbatore District, Coimbatore 641012.4. The Superintending Engineer,5. The Executive Engineer (O & M),6. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Karadivavi, Tiruppur District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of certiorarified Mandamus,calling for records and quash theorder of suspension passed by the 4th respondent in his proceedings MemoNo.003826/174/SE/PEDC/PLDM/Adm.3/Jr.Asst/F.Dkt.121 dated 22.03.2021 and to reinstate the petitioner in service in any non-sensitive post at any place by considering his representation dated 16.11.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar For R1 to R4 : Mr.C.RamkumarORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., vs Yelumalai
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
CMP No. 1063 of 2025 in C M A S.R. No. 4202 of 2025T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 319 days in filing the appeal.2. Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The reasons assigned by the petitioner for delay is justifiable. Accordingly, this petition is ordered. However, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. 21.08.2025 pbl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
B.Vijayasri and 2 others Vs B.Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Mrs.B.Vijayasri 2.Mrs.B.Leela 3.B.Ananda Kumar Petitioners vs. Mr.B.Ramakrishnan ...RespondentPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 232 & 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 5 of O.S. Rules, praying to grant Letters of Administration with the Will annexed, for the properties and credits of the deceased, to the 3rd petitioner as Son/Beneficiary under the Will of the deceased, to have effect limited to the State of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Dinesh Kumar For Respondent : No appearanceORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of the Letters of Administration in favour of the 3rd petitioner in respect of the Will dated 10.02.2023 executed by Mrs.Lalitha, who died on 10.04.2023. The petitioners 1 to 3 and the sole respondent are legal heirs of the testatrix.2. The petitioners submit that the testatrix was married to oneMr.B.Bala...
T.Thankappan, vs State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMART.Thankappan ...Petitioner Vs. Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. College Road, Chennai 600 006. Krishnagiri District. ...Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the Impugned orders of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.2225/A2/2006 dated 19.10.2010 and consequential order of the first respondent in G.O.(Vallayam) No.201, School Education (A1) Department dated 31.10.2011 that rejected my claim for selection grade and special grade quash the same and to direct the respondents to confer selection grade and special grade to the petitioner.Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.V.Parthiban For Respondents : Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, Government AdvocateORDERThis writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Impugned ord...
Narayanamoorthy vs R.Settu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
CMP.Nos.1252 & 14132 of 2022 These petitions have been filed (i) to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent in S.A.No.976 of 2021 and (ii) to bring on the record the respondents 4 to 7 as legal heirs of the deceased 2nd respondent in S.A.No.976 of 2021.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of the above petitions, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.3. Post this matter on 15.09.2025. vsn Note : Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the cause title in the Second Appeal. vsn CMP.Nos.1252 &14132 of 2022...
A. Rajagopalam Vs M/S. Ramaniyam Real Estates Pvt Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 21.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN in C.M.P.No.17457 of 2024 in A.S.SR.No.93677 of 2024 Mr.A.Rajagopalan ... Petitioner -vs-1. M/s.Ramaniyam Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by its Managing Director, Sruthi, No.21, 2nd Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 and 2 Others. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manohar For R1 : Mr.S.Sundaresan For R2 & R3 : No Appearance *****ORDERThis Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed, seeking to extend the time fixed in the order dated 12.09.2024 passed in C.M.P.No.17457 of 2024 in A.S.SR.No.93677 of 2024 to enable the petitioner to deposit the cost mentioned in the said order.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted thatC.M.P.No.17457 of 2024 was originally filed for condoning the delay of 109 days in filing the appeal suit. The petition was allowed on 12.09.2024 on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- to the Tamil Nadu Legal ...
B.Babu Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-21-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 21.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR 1.B.Babu2. C.Palanisamy3.A.Ramasamy 4.M.Rangan 5.P.Arumugam 6.G.Munusamy 7.C.Sarasu 8.C.Pathra 9.B.Nagaraj 10.V.Thulasimani 11.R.Karuppusamy 12.R.Pannammal 13.R.Muniammal 14.P.Palani .. Petitioners vs Sathyamangalam, Erode District. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to regularizethe services of the petitioners and bring them into the regular scale of pay with effect from the date of completion of 3 years of service i.e., from 06.10.2001 as per the G.O.Ms.No.71 (Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department) dated 05.05.1998 with all consequential monetary and service benefits, in the light of the order made by this Court in Rev.Appl.No.254 of 2015 in W.P.(MD).No.1083 of 2012 dated 30.05.2017 within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.K.A....
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »