Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 22 2025

Mukeshkumar Laxmandutt Sharma vs State Represented by the Inspector of ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN in 1.Mukeshkumar Laxmandutt Sharma 2.Chandanbhai Laxmandutt Sharma 3.Shakila Begum ... Petitioners Vs. State represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.213 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to modify the condition order passed in Crl.O.P.No.14070 of 2024 dated 13.02.2025 in paragraph No.4(i) (b) and 4 (i)For Petitioners : Mr.L.K.Charles Alexander For Intervenor : Mr.K.Suresh Babu For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition is filed to modify the conditional order passed in Crl.O.P.No.14070 of 2024 dated 13.02.2025 in paragraph No.4(i) (b) and 4 (i)2. The petitioners herein, apprehending arrest for the alleged offencesunder Sections 406, 420, 468 & 120B of IPC in Crime No.213 of 2024, sought anticipatory bail before this Court and their...


Aug 22 2025

K.Parthipan, vs the District Collector,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA K.Parthiban ...Petitioner Vs. and Panchayat Raj, District Collectorate Office, Cheiyar Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District 604 407. Peranamallur Post, Thiruvannamalai District - 604503. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 4th respondent to reinstate the petitioner as OHT Operator at Peranamallur Panchayat Union, Ariyapadi Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District based on the order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings No.Na.Ka.No.880/2023/A3/U.E (U)SE.Ko. dated 15.09.2023 and to pay the arrears of salary from 01.03.2023 to till date due to the petitioner within a stipulated time.For Petitioner : M/s.N.Uma Maheswari for M/s.T.Nithya For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.V.Dinesh Rajkumar, For R4 : Mr.C.Selvraj For R5 : No AppearanceORDERWhen the case was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner...


Aug 22 2025

Vellingiri vs Jothimani

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

Crl.O.P.No.8784 of 2025in Crl.A.SR.No.18461 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.Leave granted. 22.08.2025 NR Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise inorder.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Aug 22 2025

B.Dorai Raj vs the Commissioner of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.08.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR B.Dorai Raj ... Petitioner Vs. T2, Police Station, 5453+74, HVF Tank Road, Aavadi, New Vellanur, Tamil Nadu 600 154.3. Pathamani ... RespondentsPRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or may other appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of writ, to direct the second respondent Police to provide police protection for constructing the compound wall around the petitioner's land to an extent of 2400 Sq.ft., comprised in old Survey No.210/2, New Survey No.210/43, situated at Pothur Village, Avadi Taluk, Thiruvallur District vide a sale deed dated 11.06.1991 which is registered as Document No.5857 of 1991 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 07.03.2024.For Petitioner : Mr.M.Prem Kumar For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed ...


Aug 22 2025

R.P.Mohan Vs The Official Liquidator

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Comp.A.No.155 of 2024: R.P.Mohan Comp.A.No.156 of 2024: Mrs.Gunawathee Mohan In both applications: For Applicants : Mr.N.P.Vijay Kumar For Respondents : Ms.B.Ambili, Deputy Official Liquidator Ms.Nagasaila Suresh, AdministratorORDERIn view of the filing of Comp.A.No.139 of 2025 seeking to validate the earlier purchase by the applicant by paying a sum fixed by this Court in such regard, learned counsel seeks to withdraw Comp.A.Nos.155 & 156 of2024. He has made an endorsement in that regard. Accordingly, Comp.A.Nos.155 & 156 of 2024 are dismissed as withdrawn without anyorder as to costs.kj To The Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kj...


Aug 22 2025

Mahesh Vs Mr. Ganesh Pandian,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN Mahesh ... Petitioner/ Petitioner -vs- Mr. Ganesh Pandian, The Inspector of Police, Chennai - 600 044. ... Respondent/ Respondent Prayer: This Contempt Petition is filed under 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for willful and disobedience of theorder passed by this Court dated 18.04.2024 passed in Crl.O.P.No.9446 of2024. For Petitioner : Mr. M. Marudhachalam For Respondent : Mr. S. Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side)******ORDERThe contempt petition is filed reporting wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.9446 of 2024 on 18.04.2024, directing the respondent to complete the investigation in Crime No.533 of 2023 and file final report within a period of three months. Since the final report not filed within the time prescribed, this contempt petition is filed.2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) subm...


Aug 22 2025

Bharathi.a vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22.08.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Bharathi.A D/o.Aswathanarayana, No.3/499, Mudugurikki, Pannapalli, Hosur, Krishnagiri District, Pin-635 105.Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Department Human Resources Management, 2.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Department of School Education, 3.The Teachers Recruitment Board Rep. by its Chairman, 4.The Director of Elementary Education RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration declaring that Section 21-A(1) of the Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Amendment Act 2023 giving statutory effect to G.O.Ms.No. 133 dated 01.12.2021 of the 1st respondent herein in so far as it relates to direct recruitment of teachers from among the candidates belonging to linguistic minorit...


Aug 22 2025

C. Balasaraswathy vs C. Bharat Bhusan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 22-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU S.A.No.445 of 20161. C. BalasaraswathyW/o. Late C. Kothandarama Chetty, Both Are Residing At No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Chennai - 600 001. 2.C.Y.Venkataramanjulu S/o. Late C. Kothandarama Chetty. Appellant(s) Vs1. C. Bharat BhusanS/o. Late C. Kothandarama Chetty, No.7, Ramakrishna Street, Chennai - 600 001. Respondent(s) PRAYER Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, praying to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 25.11.2015 made in A.S.No.401 of 2013 on the file of the XIX Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.07.2013 passed in O.S.No.1083 of 2007 on the file of the Learned II Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.For Appellant(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): No appearanceJUDGMENTWhen the matter was taken up on 08.08.2025, a memo was filed by the learned counsel for the appellants, indicating that there ...


Aug 22 2025

T. Kamalam, Vs Mr. Su. Sasi Kumar,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 22.08.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ T.Kamalam ...PetitionerVersusMr.Su.Sasi Kumar, The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. ...Respondent Contempt Petition filed under Sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for having wilfully disobeyed the order dated 23.10.2024 made in W.P.No.31097 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr.L.Ramanathan For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government PleaderORDERThis Contempt Petition arises out of the order dated 23.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31097 of 2024.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent are present.3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent has complied the order dated 23.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.31097 of 2024.4. Recording the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Cont...


Aug 22 2025

R.Sasikumar Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Aug-22-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 22.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR R.Sasikumar .. Petitioner vs 1.The Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Additional Director General of Police, Law and Order, Chennai 600 004. 3.Deputy Inspector General of Police, Vellore Range, Vellore. 4.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Vellore District. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the fourth respondent herein in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.H.1(1)/041271/2014 dated 16.02.2019 and quash the same, and consequently direct the respondents herein to treat the period of suspension from 23.06.2008 to 30.05.2017 as duty for all purposes under Ruling 9 of Fundamental Rules 54, together with all consequential service and monetary ben...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial