Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Thangaraj vs R.Hariharan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 16.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR in K.Thangaraj ... Petitioner /Vs./ 1.R.Hariharan 2.G.Balakrishnan 3.All India Sai Samaj represented by its President, 56-B, Alamelumangapuram, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 4.M.Vasudevan, Secretary, All India Sai Samaj, 5.T.R.Kulasekaran 6.S.Karunakaran Vice President, All India Sai Samraj, 7.Sri Vidyalaya Educational Trust, Represented by its Managing Trustee, S.Karunakran.8.Veeraraghavan 9.S.Subramaniam ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed to clarify the order dated 17.03.2003 in the above O.S.A.No.475 of 2002. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Balagopal For Respondents : Mr.M.BalasubramanianORDER(Order of the Court was made by DR.ANITA SUMANTH, J.) We have received interim report dated 10.09.2025 from theInterim Administration Board (Board). The Board has assumed charge on 02.09.2025 and has been handed over the records including the accounts in re...
Duraisamy vs Veeramuthu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI AND1. Duraisamy2. Vijayaraj Appellant(s) ..Vs..1. Veeramuthu2. Ranganayagam3. Jeyalakshmi Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): S.Arjun For Respondent(s): M/s. R. Nandhakumar, Counsel For Caveator VikramkumarR. KALAIMATHI, J.lbmORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Second Appeal stating that the dispute between the appellants and respondents is settled out of Court. Accordingly, he has filed a memo enclosing the letter of the appellant.2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 29-08-2025 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking order /Non Speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/No Lbm AND...
A.W.S.Jayachitra vs S. Padmanaban
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 48 days in representing the above CMA.SR.No.9911 of 2019.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable. Therefore, the delay in filling CMA.SR.No.9911 of 2019 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. Registry is further directed to print the name of the learned counsel appearing for the appellants. smn smn in...
P.Rudhra vs P.Palanivel(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and C.M.P.No.4960 of 20251. P.Rudhra2. P.Keerthi3. P.Ramya Petitioner(s) Vs1. P.Palanivel(died)Respondent-1 Died. Respondent-2(who is already on record) are recorded as LRs of the deceased R-1 P.Palanivel as per memo seal dated.03/04/2025 are recorded and vide court order dated.21/04/2025 made in TR.CMP No.255 of 2025 in CMP No.4960 of 2025 by PTAJ. 2.P.Sivagami 3.P.Malaleena Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 24 of CPC to withdraw the suit in O.S. No. 108 / 2011 on the file of the Additional District Judge, (Special Court for Prevention of SC/ST Atrocities) Namakkal and to transfer the same to Principle District Court, Salem.For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Vijayakumar For Respondent(s): M/s.S.Dhayaleswaran for R3 R1 - Died (steps Taken) R2 - NAORDERThis Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking direction of this Court to withdra...
D.Thulasi Bhai vs D.Sanniyasi Rao
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN1.D.Thulasi Bhai 2.S.DhanalaPavani ..... Petitioners Vs D.Sanniyasi Rao ..... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for records and set aside the order passed in MC.No.88 of 2017 dated 25.03.2021 passed by the learned V Additional Principal Judge, Full Additional Charge of II Additional Family Court, Chennai and enhance the maintenance amount by allowing this criminal revision case. For Petitioners : M/s.S.Vennila For Respondent : No appearanceORDERThis Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the orderpassed in MC.No.88 of 2017 dated 25.03.2021 by the learned V Additional Principal Judge, Full Additional Charge of II Additional Family Court, Chennai, thereby ordering monthly maintenance.2. The first petitioner is the wife of the respondent. They had gotmarried on 27.04.2001. They gave birth to the second pet...
V.Mani vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN V.Mani : Petitioner Vs Kallakurichi District : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 to 4 to take action and clean the Chitteri Vaaikal situated behind the Gangai Amman Kovil Street, Thirukovilur pursuant to the petitioner's representations dated 10.12.2024 and 11.12.2024.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthik Jegannath, Government Advocate, for respondents 1, 3 and 4 Mr.K.C.Vinodh, for Mr.T.K.Saravanan, for respondent No.2ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance raised in this petition no longer exists since the channel, Chiteeri Vaikkal, has been cleaned up. There...
T.Kumaresan vs the Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.Nos.5709 & 5713 of 2025 T.Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Chief Secretary 2.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary Thiruvallur. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the recordspertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.154, Public (Special A) Department dated 14.02.2024 and also G.O.Ms.No.158, Public (Special A) Department dated 16.02.2024 and consequential order passed by the second respondent in G.O.[2D] No.69 [Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Service Unit, Service 1 Section], dated 23.2.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to restore petitioner to the post of District Revenue Officer by placing the petitioner in 2013-2014 Deputy Collect...
Kalaiselvi vs the Manager
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
CMP No. 19200 of 2016T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 173 days in filing the cross objection in the above appeal in CMA No. 3292 of 2011.2. Heard the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. The reason assigned by the petitioner for delay is justifiable. Accordingly, this petition is ordered. 29.08.2025 pbl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Director of Social Welfare vs P.Mary Therasa
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
C.M.P.No.5628 of 2025 in W.A.SR.No.36039 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.] This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 418 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.S.Yashwanth, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioner.3. The respondent though served and her name and address having been printed in the cause list, none appears for the respondent.4. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.5. Registry is directed to number the appeal and place the same for admission, if the papers are otherwise in order. [R.S.K., J.] [K.G.T, J.] 29.08.2025 KST https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
J.Richard Tensingh Vs S.Karmegam,IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-29-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 29.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH 1.J.Richard Tensingh 2.B.Sheela Prasanna Rubavathy .. Petitioners Vs. 1.S.Karmegam, IAS, Director of Collegiate Education, I.A.S.E. Campus, 577, Annasalai, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. 2.Jagadeeswari Devendran, Financial Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer, Directorate of Collegiate Education, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015. 3.Dr.Ponmuthuramalingam, Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Madurai Region, Madurai 2. .. RespondentsPrayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience and violation of the order passed in W.P.No.29481 of 2023 dated 19.10.2023.M.S.RAMESH, J.krk For Petitioners : Mr.E.Martin Jayakumar For Respondents : Mr.J.Ravindran, Additional Advocate General Assisted by, Mr.D.Ravichandran Special Government PleaderORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners, as well as the learned Additi...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »