Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 28 2025

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs Sundaramurthy

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

in C.M.A.SR.No.177184 of 2024T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 82 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award dated 05.04.2024 passed in M.C.O.P.No. 120 of 2021, on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub-Judge, Vridhachalam.2. Mr.D.Bhaskaran, learned counsel for appellant submitted that aftergetting sanction from the competent authorities, the appeal papers forwarded by the Regional Office at Chennai to the counsel on record and thereafter, the appeal was filed on 29.11.2024, as a result of which, there is a delay of 82 days in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arose, which is neither willful nor wanton. Therefore, he filed this petition to condone the delay in filing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 3.Mr.S.Udhayakumar, learned counsel for respondent appeared and raised strong objections stating that no sufficient cause assigned for the delay.4. Considering the...


Jul 28 2025

Great Lakes Multi State Co-Operative Vs The District Collector

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

2025:MHC:1822IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Great Lakes Multi State Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer S.Sakthivel, No.76/190, South Cross Street, Srivilliputhur 626 125 Virudhunagar District .. Appellant vs5.S.P.Velayutham 6.P.Sathyanarayanan 7.R.Pangajam .. Respondents Prayer : Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to allow the Writ Appeal by modifying the Final order and Judgement passed in W.P.No.19822 of 2018 dated 08.12.2021 on the file of this Court and consequently allow the Writ Petition No.19822 of 2018 as prayed for. For Appellant : Mr.Arjun Ram for Ms.K.Kokilavane For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, (for R1 to R4) Special Government Pleader No Appearance (for R5 & R6)JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Mr.Arjun Ram, learned counsel representing Ms.K.Kokilavane, learned counsel on record for ...


Jul 28 2025

G.Narayanasamy vs District Collector

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

WMP No.684 of 2025 in WP.No.34594 of 2024 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J Impleading petition ordered as prayed for. 28.07.2025 1/2 KP Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the cause title. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jul 28 2025

Delta Electronics Inida Pvt. Ltd Vs Dr. Rajesh Lakhoni, IAS., and 2 ot ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH and Sub Application(OS) No.326 of 2025 in Cont.P.DR.No.6516 of 2025 Delta Electronics India Pvt. Ltd., SEZ Unit, SF No.16/1B2B (Part) & Industrial Park Kurubarapally Village Krishnagiri 635 115. Represented by its Authorized Signatory. .. Petitioner vs. Krishnagiri. .. Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful and wanton disobedience of the directions/orders, dated 09.01.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.14989 of 2020. For Petitioner : Mr.Rahul Balaji For Respondents : Mr.S.Madhusuthanan Standing Counsel for R1 to R3ORDERThis Contempt Petition was filed on the ground that the order passed by this Court in WP.No.14989 of 2024 dated 09.01.2024, was not complied with. 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on ...


Jul 28 2025

Doulath Farvin vs Yaasir

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH IN Doulath Farvin Petitioner(s) Vs 2.The Tahsildar, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District. Respondent(s) For Petitioner: M/s.I.Kowser Nissar For Respondents:ORDERAccepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered and the petitioner in this petition is impleaded as nd the 2 respondent in the Writ Petition.2. The Registry is directed to carryout the necessary amendments.dsa To S/o.Akbar Ali, 75/25d, Bilal Rali Street, Labbaikudikadu, Pennakonam, Kunnam, Perambalur District. 2.The Tahsildar Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District. N.ANAND VENKATESH J. dsa IN...


Jul 28 2025

A Roshan Vs Thirrupathi Brothers rep by its Partner N Subash Chandra B ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A Roshan D-Block No.3C, A.V.M. Studio, No.38, Arcot Road, Vadapalani, Chennai-26 ... Applicant -vs- Thirrupathi Brothers rep by its Partner N Subash Chandra Bose, No.16, Lamech Street, Janaki Nagar, Valasaravakkam, Chennai 600 087 and 6 Others ... Respondents For Applicant : Ms.Kanimozhi Mathi For Respondents : Ms.B.Ambili, Deputy Official Liquidator **********ORDERAt the hearing on 09.07.2025, the Official Liquidator had filed memo dated 09.07.2025 stating that the records, including the financial statements of the company in liquidation, do not indicate that Gemini Colour Laboratory was merged with Gemini Industries and Imaging Limited. In SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J rna view thereof, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that she does not intend to prosecute this application. Therefore, A.No.943 of 2025 is closed without any order as to costs. 28.07.2025 (1/2) rna...


Jul 28 2025

M/s.Coromandal Agros and Marine Agencies, Vs Greaves Cotton Limited,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CMP No.11351 of 2025 inM/s.Coromandal Agros and Marine Agencies, Represented by its Proprietor T.K.S.Manimaran Having its registered office at No.23/897/1, Wahabpet, Near Madras Bus Stand Nellore - 524 003 and Having its regional office at No.6-B, Bharathi Colony, Alwarthiru Nagar Chennai- 600087. Appellant(s) Vs Greaves Cotton Limited, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer Having its registered office at J-2, MIDC Industrial Area, Chikalthana Aurangabad, Maharashtra, Pin code-431 210. and another Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.S.ElumalaiORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.2. This is an application seeking to condone the delay in re- presentation of the appeal.3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the application for condonation of de...


Jul 28 2025

Tamilselvi vs Rathamani

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI AND MP NO. 5282 OF 20251. TAMILSELVI W/o.Late Rangasamy, Residing at2. Birundha Devi D/o.Late Rangasamy, Residing at3. Gowri Shankar S/o.Late Rangasamy, Residing at Petitioner(s) Vs1. RATHAMANIW/o.Somasundaram, No.174 Vadukapalayam, Velliraveli Village, Kunnathur Via, Uthukuli Tk., Tiruppur 2.Kalaiselvi W/o.kandasamy, No.158 Semmankuzhimedu, Pudukadu Thottam, Navakadu Thottam, Navakadu Vilage, Kunnathur Via., 3.Selvalakshmi W/o.sampathkumar, Door No.1/50 Kumaragoundanpalayam, Kuruchi Village, Kunnathur Via, Uthukuli Tk., Tiruppur Dist. 4.The Tahsildar 5.The Dist.Collector District Collector Office, Tiruppur Dist. Respondent(s) PRAYER This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 20-01-2025 made in IA.No.110/2024 in OS.No.66/2020 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Co...


Jul 28 2025

A. Radhakrishnan, Vs Thiru. P. N. Sridhar, I.A.S., and 11 others

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH A.Radhakrishnan .. Petitioner vs. Sankari - 637 301, Salem District. Tahsildar, Sankari Taluk, Sankari. Temple Lands, Salem. District Special Branch Salem 636 002. Department, Sankari Salem. .. Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful and wanton disobedience of the directions/orders, dated 28.10.2024 passed by this Court in WP.No.32131 of 2024.For Petitioner : Mr.A.Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.G.Velu, Additional Government Pleader for R2 to R6 & R9 Mr.K.Karthikeyan, Government Advocate for R1, R10 to R12 Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana,Government Advocate(Crl.Side) for R7 & R8ORDERThis Contempt Petition was filed on the ground that the order passed by this Court in WP.No.32131 of 2024 dated 28.10.2024, was not complied with. 2.When the matter was taken up fo...


Jul 28 2025

Kokilavani vs State Rep by, Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jul-28-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.MP.No.6169 of 2025 in Mrs.Kokilavani ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by The Inspector of Police, Chennai District. (Crime No.183 of 2022) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.Ralph V.Manohar For Respondent : Mr.C.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ********ORDERThe petitioner, arrayed as A3, had a case registered against her in Crime No.183 of 2022 and was granted anticipatory bail in Crl.M.P.No.3826 of 2023 by this Court on 06.10.2023. One of the condition was that the petitioner should submit her passport before the learned special Court for CCB & CBCID Cases,Egmore. she was further directed to furnish security worth Rupees One Crore, which was duly complied with. Subsequently, the condition imposed in the anticipatory bail was modified in Crl.M.P.No.16203 of 2024, and the same is extracted hereunder: "5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions, a dire...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial