Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Kala Vs Mr. Kannappan.M, and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN R.Kala ... Petitioner Vs.1. Kannappan.M. Assistant General Manager,2. Arun Kumar,Chief Manager SBI, Coimbatore 641 018. ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to commit and punish the respondent for disobeying the order of this Court dated 04.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.3303 of 2022. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.C.Mohan & Ms.A.Rexy Josephine Mary For M/s. King & PartridgeORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order dated 04.07.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.3303 of 2022, thereby directed the respondents to disburse the family pension to the petitioner from the date of demise of her mother and till the date of her life time, within a period of six weeks.2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitt...
M/S. Hansa Vision Pvt. Ltd., vs the Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR W.P.No. 572 of 2012 and M.P.No. 1 of 2012 M/s. Hansa Vision Pvt Ltd., No.621, Anna Salai, Sire Mansion 3rd Floor, Chennai 600 006. .. Petitioner vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Tax Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Nungambakkam Assessment Circle, No.88, Taluk Office Building, Spur Tank Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600 031. 3.The Joint Commissioner (CT), Chennai Central Division, Chenna. .. RespondentsDR. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit to declare Entry 46 of Part B of the First Schedule to the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 insofar as it provides for le...
M.Shankar, Vs M/s.Five Star Business Finance Limited,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE A No. 1329 of 2025 in Arb.O.P.SR.No.102576 of 20221. M.Shankar, S/o.Munisamy, Vellore 455, North Arcot, Tamilnadu2. S.Saritha, W/o.Shankar, No.48,Sempalli,Gudiyatham, Vellore-455 North arcot,Tamilnadu.3. S.Vasanth S/o.Shankar, Vellore 455, North Arcot, Tamilnadu...Applicant(s) Vs M/s.Five Star Business Finance Limited, A Company Registered under the Companies Act 1956, and having the registered office at New No.23,Old No.4,Taylors Road, Kilpauk,Chennai-600010. Represented by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.G.S.Robert, Manager Legal. ..Respondent(s) To Set aside order passed by the Learned Master in A.No.245 of 2025 dated 28.01.2025 the above Original Petition For Applicant(s): M.Sarathkumar For Respondent(s): M/s. M.Ajmal AzzathORDERThis Court, in its order dated 30.06.2025, had made it clear that the applicants will have to pay directly to the respondent 30% of the impugned arbitral ...
Olympia Grande Senior Citizen Mana-Magizh Mandram vs M/S.Athulya Assis ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
WMP NO. 9039 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WMP NOs. 9039 and 5032 of 2025 IN WP NO. 39176 OF 2024 Olympia Grande Senior Citizen Mana-magizh Mandram Rep. By Its President, V.S.Venkatesan, D 9c Olympia Grande, No. 328,GST Rod, Pallavaram, Chennai -600 043. Petitioner(s) in both WMPs Vs M/s.Athulya Assisted Living Private Limited, Rep. By Its Authorized Signatory, Fredrick Antony, No.40, North Phase, 5th Cross Street, Kalaimagal Nagar, Ekkatuthangal, Chennai-600 032. and another Respondent(s) in both Wps For Petitioner(s) in WMP No.9039 of 2025 : Mr.M.Selvam in WMP No.5032 of 2025 : Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondent(s): in both WMPs. Mr.Rajagopal Vasudevan for R1 Mr.E.Vijay Anand, Additional Government Pleader for R2Prayer: Writ Miscellaneous petitions have been filed to implead the petitioner herein, as 2nd respondent in the above main writ petition and other connected writ miscellaneous petitions.ORDERT...
Lyca Productions Pvt Ltd Vs A.Shankar alias Savukku Shankar and 2 othe ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU IN CS NO. 65 OF 2024 Lyca Productions Pvt Ltd Represented by its Director Mr.Neelakant Narayanpur, Having Registered Office at No.55, Vijayaraghava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. Applicant(s) Vs A.Shankar alias Savukku Shankar and 2 others S/o.Mr.Achimuthu, Residing at No.12/6, MMDA, TNHB Flats, Maduravoyal, Tiruvallur, Poonamallee, Tamil Nadu, India 600095. and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Plaintiff(s): Mr.B. Arvind Srevatsa For Defendant(s): Mr. C. Vigneswaran for D1 Mr.P.Vasantha Kumar for D2ORDERThe present application has been filed to pass a prohibitory order against the 3 rd respondent/ Garnishees, prohibiting the 3rd respondent from paying any revenue accruing to the benefit of the respondents/ defendants 1 and 2 from and out fo the YouTube Video uploaded by the respondents/ defendants 1 and 2 dated 04.03.2024, morefully set out in the schedule to the Judges summons and conse...
M.Sivakumar and 7 others Vs K.Panindera Reddy and 8 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN1. M.Sivakumar2. T.Nagaraj3. M.Vijayakumar4. E.Subbiah Suryakumar5. R.Murugan6. R.Radhakrishnan7. S.Saravanan8. S.Saravanan ... Petitioners Vs.1. K.Panindera Reddy Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Tamilnadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 0092. K. Gunasekaran Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Limited, No 3/137, Salamedu, Vizhupuram, Vizhupuram District - 605 602.3. Dr.T.Prabhushankar, I.A.S., Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Limited, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 0024. R. Mohan State Express Transport Corporation (Tamilnadu) Limited, Pallavan Salai - 600 002.5. R.Ponmudi (Kumbakonam) Limited, 46, Railway Station New Road, Kumbakonam.6. R.Singaravelu, (Madurai) Limited, Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 010.7. S. Joseph Dias (Salem) Limited, 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem 636 0078. G. Selvam (Coimbatore) Limited, 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore - 641 0...
A.Kumaresan vs K.Kavitha
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI and A.Kumaresan ...Petitioner Vs. K.Kavitha ...Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order passed in E.P.No.4 of 2014 in HMCMA.No.2 of 2010 on the file of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thirupathur, Vellore District, dated 04.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thiruvengadam For Respondent : Mr.S.Angamuthu Page No.1 of 4ORDERThe present revision petition has been filed challenging the orderpassed in E.P.No.4 of 2014 in HMCMA.No.2 of 2010 on the file of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thirupathur, Vellore District, dated 04.03.2023.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions from the revision petitioner.3. I am able to see that this Court, even by order dated 03.04.2025 had directed the learned counsel for the petitioner to verify if the petitione...
Mrs. Valliammal, Vs Mrs. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Valliammal ... Petitioner Vs.1. Rashmi Siddharth Zagade, District Collector,2. Muthamizhan Karunanithi3. Rangarajan,Revenue Divisional Officer, Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents herein for th deliberate and wilful disobedience of the order dated 01.10.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29192 of 2024. For Petitioner : Ms.A.R.Sindhu For Respondents For R1 & R3 : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non compliance of the order dated 01.10.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.29192 of 2024, thereby directed the first respondent to forward the application filed by the petitioner dated 25.06.2024 to the third respondent within a period of two weeks and on receipt of the same, t...
Dr.S.Selvakumar vs Dr.a.B.Selvarangan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
O.A.No.590 of 2018 in C.S.No.410 of 2018C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.This Original Application has been filed seeking interim injunction against the respondent from disturbing the peaceful possession of the schedule mentioned properties. However, trial had commenced wherein one of the relief is grant of permanent injunction. Therefore, this Original Application stands closed. 30.07.2025 smv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mr.Sridev Prakash Vs Padmaja Prakash and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in C.S.DR.No.37855 of 2024 Mr.Sridev Prakash S/o.Late Mr.Prakash Devarajan, 8347, Copperwood Lane, Jacksonville, Florida 32216, USA and also at 5/59 D, 1st Lane, 4th Avenue, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. Applicant(s) Vs Padmaja Prakash and another W/o.Late Mr.Prakash Devarajan, 5/59 D, 1st Lane, 4th Avenue, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.N.MathivananORDERThe present application has been filed to grant leave to sue the second respondent/ second defendant who is residing outside Chennai and the Schedule B of suit property which is outside Chennai in the above suit before this Court. 2.Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the suit Scheduled A property is within the jurisdiction of this Court and hence, requested this Court to allow the present application. 3.Heard the learned counsel for the applica...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »