Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sonal J.Davey and 2 Others Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Sonal.J.Davey 2.Khushali.J.Davey 3.Yash.J.Davey PetitionersPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 6 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying that a Succession Certificate may be granted to the 1st petitioner with the power to collect the securities and receive interest, dividends and thereon and negotiate and transfer the securities as listed out in the schedule. For Petitioners : M/s.Vidya ChetanORDERThe petitioners seek Succession Certificate in favour of the 1st petitioner in respect of the securities held by Mr.Jatin B.Davey, who died intestate on 30.09.2023.2. The petitioners submit that the deceased was married to the 1stpetitioner and the couple had begotten the petitioners 2 and 3 as their children. The petitioners further submit that the mother of the deceased Mrs.Sarita B.Davey ha...
Subramaniam vs Kalaivanan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Subramaniam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.Kalaivanan 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed praying to permit the petitioner to replace the original joint agreement to Photo Copy of the Joint Agreement. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balaji For Respondents For R1 : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For R2 & 3 : Mr.M.Murali, Government AdvocateORDERThis writ miscellaneous petition has been filed praying to permit the petitioner to replace the original joint agreement dated 25.05.2022 to photocopy of the said joint agreement.2. Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the first respondent, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 2 & 3 and perused all the materials placed before this Court.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of this...
M/s.G.R.Thangamaligai (Firms) Vs K.Bavani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
A.Nos.3639 & 3640 of 2025 in C.S.Nos.81 & 91 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Applications have been filed to receive the Reply Statement in C.S.No.81 of 2024 and to receive the Reply Statement in C.S.No.91 of 2024.2. Mr.T.Paranthaman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that he has no objection in allowing the said applications.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made in theaffidavit filed in support of these applications and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 has no objection in allowing these applications, the applications in A.Nos.3639 & 3640 of 2025 in C.S.Nos.81 & 91 of 2024 are ordered as prayed for. 30.07.2025 (1/2) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/S.R S Jewel Tech, Vs Assistant Commissioner Commercial Taxes Departm ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CoramTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY and M/s.R S Jewel Tech, Represented by Proprietor Natesan Viswanathan Senthil, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - 600 017. ...Petitioner Vs. Assistant Commissioner Nandanam, Zone VI, Chennai Central, Tamil Nadu - 600 028. ...Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records leading to the issuance of order DRC07 under Section 73 dated 27.06.2023, by the respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondent herein to consider the September 2021 month returns, with a direction that excess tax paid in July 2021 erroneously may be adjusted against the excess utilisation of Input Tax credit. For Petitioner : Mr.T.C.PrakashFor Respondent : Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik Additional Government Pleader (Tax)ORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to quash the impugne...
Mrs.Asha P Sharma and 3 others Vs nil
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
A.No.3624 of 2025 in O.P.No.372 of 2003K.KUMARESH BABU, J.The present Application has been filed to grant extension of the Succession Certificate with power to collect the Debts, receive interest and dividends on and negotiate and transfer in respect of the debts morefully described and in the Schedule to the accompanying this Judges Summons.2. Considering the averments made in theaffidavit filed in support of this application and having been satisfied with the reasons stated therein, the application in A.No.3624 of 2025 in O.P.No.372 of 2003 is ordered as prayed for. 30.07.2025 kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K.Chandrasekar, Vs The State Rep by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.R.C.No. 1256 of 2025 K.Chandrasekar .... Petitioner Vs 1.The State Rep. By the Public Prosecutor 2.K.Viswananth Kamath .... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the Trial Court in C.C.No.418 of 2017, on the file of the II Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court No.II, Coimbatore, pending disposal of this revision petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajesh Vivekananthan For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.LppORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to exempt the petitioner from surrendering before the trial Court.2. In view of the order passed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.14701 of2025 dated 30.07.2025, granting suspension of sentence, no further order is necessary in this petition. Accordingly, ...
A.Waheeda Banu vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED :30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN A.Waheeda Banu ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner, Chennai 600 015.3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Ariyalur Detachment, Ariyalur District. ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records relating to the first respondent proceeding made in G.O (D) No.96, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (E2) Department on 20.04.2023 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service revoking the order of suspension. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Saranraj For Respondents : Mr.G.Nanmaran, Special Government Pleader *****ORDERThough the present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the suspension order dated 20.04.2025, the learned Speci...
Deivanayagi vs Sivagame(Died)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDate : 30.07.2025CORAM:THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P (NPD) Nos.869 and 871 of 2020 and CMP No.4640 of 2020 Deivanayagi ... Petitioner ..Vs. Sivagame (died) 1.Deva Achari 2.Dhanalakshmi 3.Meena 4.Usha 5.Elango 6.Padma 7.Subramani 8.The Sub Registrar-2 Arakonam. ... Respondents decreetal order dated 30.09.2019 passed in I.A No.532 of 2018 in O.S decreetal order dated 30.09.2019 passed in I.A No.531 of 2018 in O.S N.SATHISH KUMAR,J uma For Petitioner : Mr.G.V.Sridharan For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal for R8 Government Advocate No Appearance - R3 to R6 R1, R2 & R7 - Notice unservedORDER` Though this Court, by an order dated 08.07.2025 ordered notice to the respondents 1, 2 and 7, steps have not been taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner to serve notice. Hence, both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 30.07.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No uma To ...
Jagadeesan and 2 others Vs Rajendiran and 4 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL OP No. 713 of 20241. Jagadeesan S/o. Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.1/156, Chetty Street, Koovathur Village, Cheyyur Taluk,2. Karunakaran S/o. Late Kameswaran, Grandson of Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.13/22, Manickam Maistry Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.3. K.Haridoss S/o. Late Kameswaran, Grandson of Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.80/2, Chetty Street, Koovathur Village, Cheyyur Taluk,' ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Rajendiran and 4 others S/o. Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.1/156, Chetty Street, Koovathur Village, Cheyyur Taluk,2. B.Srinivasan S/o. Late Bhoologam, Grandson of Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.22/11, Manickam Maistry Street, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014.3. B.Sekar, S/o. Late Bhoologam, Grantson of Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, No.1/156, Chetty Street, Koovathur Village, Cheyyur Taluk,4. Muthulakshmi W/o. Arumugam Achari, D/o. Late K.A.Kannaia Achari, 14, Gazette Begum Street, Royapettah,...
N.Sathish Vs Sadhanaikural
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-30-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN N.Sathish ... Petitioner Vs. Sadhanaikural, District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to take cognizance and punish the respondent herein under the Contempt of Court Act, for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court in W.P.No.5799 of 2018 dated 25.10.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.Durai Gunasekaran For Respondent : Mr. S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order dated 25.10.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.5799 of 2018, thereby directed the respondent to re-classify the subject land into the patta land and to issue patta in favour of the petitioner, within a period of six weeks.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondentsubmitted that as dir...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »