Chennai Orders Court July 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Slo Steels Ltd Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
CMP.Nos.15504, 15592, 15562, 15775 & 15595 of 2025 and W.A.SR.Nos.19847, 18308, 18491, 20419 & 19110 of 2025Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR,J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) For the reasons set out in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 188, 149, 160, 172 and 156 days respectively in re-presenting the Writ Appeals is condoned and these Miscellaneous Petition are ordered.2. Registry to number the Writ Appeals, if they are otherwise in order, and list the same for admission. [A.S.M.,J] [N.S.,J] 23.07.2025 sl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Radhambigai Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 23.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA & W.M.P.Nos. 7623 & 7624 of 2021 Radhambigai ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Karuppa Goundanpalayam, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 604. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Labour 84, 1st St., Vallalar Nagar, Nehruji Nagar, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu 624 001.3.The Tashildar, Tiruppur South, Kallangadu, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 605. 4.The Revenue Tasildar, Jaivabhai School Rd, Susaiyapuram, Rayapuram, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu 641 687 5.G.V.Ravikumar ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, quashing the form 5 notice issued under section 27 of Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act 1864 issued on the petitioner by the 3rd respondent Tashildar, dated 11.01.2021 issued in lieu of the communications of the 1st Respondentorder dated 11.9.2020, 2nd respondent order 24.07.2020 and 3rdrespondent communicatio...
Exxonmobil Lubricants Pvt Ltd vs the Assistant Commissioner(St)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.07.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy W.P.Nos.5855, 5952, 5956, 1692, 1696 & 1700 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.6483, 6604, 6609, 1736, 1741 & 1744, 2985, 2986 of 2024 EXXONMOBIL LUBRICANTS PVT LTD Represented by its Tax Supervisor Mr. Vignesh Murugesan No.571 A and 571 /1 C1A G.N.T Road Sholavaram Village, Tiruvallur -600 067. ...Petitioner in all W.Ps. Vs. 1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ST) Manali Assessment Circle Wall Tax Road Chennai-03.2 The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Madhavaram Assessment Circle Chennai - 600 066. ...Respondents in all W.Ps. Common Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for records leading to the issuance of revised order bearing reference TIN/33081084362/2012-13, 2011-12, 2008-09, 2007-08,2009-10 & 2010-2011 dated 15.11.2023 to the extent of additions made for sale of lubricants against IIC and e...
Shanmugam Vs Raju
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
Crl.O.P.No. 20730 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No. 48428 of 2024 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J Leave granted. 23.07.2025 Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. Lpp 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN C.M.P.No.9705 of 2025 in Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation Chennai-600 034 Appellant(s) Vs M/s. Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd C/o. CRBS & Associates LLP Chartered Accountants No.37, 2nd Street, Alagiri Nagar Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Karthik For Respondent(s): M/s.A.SharrenORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the applicant.2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, we are inclined to allow the prayer and grant exemption from filing the certified copy of the common order.3. Application is, accordingly, allowed. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 23.07.2025 kpl...
P.Ramesh Palanisamy Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Mr.P.Ramesh Palanisamy Petitioner PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 and under Order XXV Rule 6 of O.S.Rules to grant succession certificate to the sole petitioner with a power to collect the debts and to receive the dividends thereon and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the description. For Petitioner :Mr.R.K.Arjun RajORDERThe petitioner seeks Succession Certificate in respect of the debts heldby Late P.Raju, who died intestate on 27.09.2020. The petitioner is the brother of the deceased. The father and mother of the deceased are not alive.2. The petitioner has examined himself as PW1. He has produced thedeath certificate of the deceased as Ex.P2. The legal heirship certificate of the deceased as Ex.P1. The legal heirship certificate of the mother of the deceased as Ex.P3. A perusal of Ex.P1, shows that the dec...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 23.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN C.M.P.No.9725 of 2025 in Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation Chennai-600 034 Appellant(s) Vs M/s. Watanmal Boolchand Company Ltd C/o. CRBS & Associates LLP Chartered Accountants No.37, 2nd Street, Alagiri Nagar Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026 Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.R.Karthik For Respondent(s): M/s.A.SharrenORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent.2. This is an application seeking to condone the delay in re- presentation of the appeal.3. For the reasons stated in the affidavit, the application for condonation of delay is allowed.4. Appeal be listed for admission. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN,J) 23.07.2025 kpl...
P.Nagappan and 2 others Vs Mr. Rajinikanth,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN 1.P.Nagappan 2.P.Ramachandran 3.P.Dilli Baskar ... Petitioners Vs. Mr.Rajinikanth Tahsildar Tiruvallur & District 602 001. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to issue summon and punish the respondent for his act of contempt of court for deliberately disobeyed the order of this Court dated 12.11.2021 in W.P.No.17001 of 2021. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondent : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non compliance of the order dated 12.11.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.17001 of 2021, thereby directed the respondent to pass orders, immediately after receipt of the report from the Land Surveyor, in respect of the issuance of patta, in favour of the petitioners.2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the r...
Ranganath Raja Vs Mahamood Mohamed Ilias
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.07.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Ranganath Raja ... Applicant vs.1. Mahamood Mohamed Ilias2. M/s.Brand on Anything ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr.G. Vairava Subramanian For Respondents : R1 Set ex-parteORDERThe learned counsel for the applicant is not pressing this application. He has made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed.ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J....
T.Kannaiyan (Deceased) and 2 others Vs Mrs. Shivaranjini and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jul-23-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.07.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN T.Kannaiyan (Deceased)1. Vinayakamoorthi. K2. Manimekalai. K.3. Bharathi Kannaiyan (P1 to P3 substituted as LRs of deceased sole petitioner videorder dated 14.09.2023 madein W.M.P.No.25868 of 2023 in W.P.No.4118 of 2020) ... Petitioners Vs.1. Shivaranjini President/Administrator,2. M.Kannan Secretary, Sirkali. ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for committingcontempt of Court for wilful disobedience of orders of this Court in W.P.No.4118 of 2020 dated 05.08.2020 and to direct the respondents to pay exemplary costs for such disobedience. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Hariharan For Respondents : Mr.S.Ravikumar Special Government PleaderORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for non compliance of the order dated 05.08.2020, passed by this Court in W....
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »