Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 30 2025

M/s. Real Talen Engineering Private Limited Vs Dr. K.S. Palanisamy and ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY1. M/s. Real Talent Engineering Private Limited Rep.by its Executive Director Mr.Doraiswamy, Having its registered office at 67, Chamiers Road, Chennai-600 028. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Dr. K.S. Palanisamy The Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.P.Madhusudhan Reddy, The Director of Survey and Settlement, Survey House, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 3.J.U.Chandrakala, The District Collector, Collectorate, M.B.T. Road, Bharathi Nagar, Ranipet-632 403. 4.N.Suresh, The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate, M.B.T.Road, Bharathi Nagar, Ranipet-632 403. 5.T.Rajarajan, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sholinghur Divisional Office, Sholinghur Taluk, Ranipet District-631 102. 6.R.Rajalaxmi, The Tahsildar, Sholinghur Taluk Office, Ranipet District-631 102. Contemnor(s)PRAYER To punish the Respondents herein for Contempt of court for their wilful disobedienc...


Jun 30 2025

Balakumar Vs The Principal Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

inIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR in W.M.P. Nos.22284 of 2025 in W.P. No.20236 of 2022 vs.3. Pandi Respondents Constitution of India praying to restore the W.P.No.20236 of 2022 on W.M.P. Nos.22290 of 2025 in W.P. No.21323 of 2022 vs. Page Nos.1/6 in3. Ganesan Respondents Constitution of India praying to restore the W.P.No.21323 of 2022 on W.M.P. Nos.22292 of 2025 in W.P. No.21329 of 2022 vs.3. Pandi Respondents Constitution of India praying to restore the W.P.No.21329 of 2022 on W.M.P. Nos.22321 of 2025 in W.P. No.21320 of 2022 vs. Page Nos.2/6 in3. Ganesan Respondents Constitution of India praying to restore the W.P.No.21320 of 2022 on W.M.P. Nos.22326 of 2025 in W.P. No.21333 of 2022 vs.3. Easwaran Respondents Constitution of India praying to restore the W.P.No.21333 of 2022 on W.M.P. Nos.22328 of 2025 in W.P. No.21031 of 2022 Page Nos.3/6 in vs.3. Easwaran Responde...


Jun 30 2025

V.Balachandran vs the Assistant Direction of Director of Town

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN1. V.Balachandran S/o Viswanthan No 849/ 850, Vadakku Street, Kuruppanaickenpalayam Bhavani Taluk Erode District Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Assistant Direction Of Director Of Town And Country Planning, District Town And Counry Planning Office, Sampath Nagar, Erode 638 011 Respondent(s) PRAYERThe Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to permit petitioner to open the building and remove he machineries from petitioner yarn twisting / doubling unit situated in S.F. No 70/3D1 Urachikottai Vilalge bhavani Taluk, Erode district to other place in view of the proceedings of the 1 st respondent nd dated 22.07.2024 and 2 respondent dated 01.03.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr. R.Prabakar For Respondent(s): Mr.M. Venkateswaran Special Government PleaderORDER(Order ...


Jun 30 2025

S. Lakshmi Vs Santha

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

CMP.No.14674 of 2025 in SA SR.No.139310 of 2024R.KALAIMATHI, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 159 days to accept the deficit court fee in the above second appeal.2. Being satisfied with the reasonsstated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and the delay of 159 days in accepting the deficit court fee is hereby condoned. 30.06.2025 kkd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 30 2025

RAMILA Vs The Secretary to the Government,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Ramila ... Petitioner Vs. Vellore District ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent dated 14.03.2025 in C3/D.O.No.13/2025 against the petitioner son Aravind, Male, aged 23 years, S/o. Rajendiran, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty.For Petitioner : Mr.. D. Balaji For Respondents : Mr.E. Raj Thilak, Additional Public ProsecutorORDER(Order of the Court was made by M.S. RAMESH, J.) When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by pr...


Jun 30 2025

Tata Capital Ltd Vs GODWIN JOHNSON

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Tata Capital Limited .. Applicant vs Godwin Johnson .. RespondentORDERAs early as on 02.04.2025 itself, this Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle. Till date, the vehicle has not been located. Till date, further extensions were sought for by the learned counsel for the applicant. 2.In view of the fact that sufficient opportunities have been granted for the Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle, no further extension can be granted.ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.vga 3.Accordingly, this application is closed. Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. 4.Once the vehicle is located and while considering the fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same Advocate Commissioner since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner. 30....


Jun 30 2025

C. Madeswaran Vs Mr. Pavankumar G. Giriyappanavar, IAS., and 3 others

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.Madeswaran .. PetitionerVersus1. Mr.Pavankumar G.Giriyappanavar, IAS, The District Collector,2. Dr.Mrs.M.Sharmila, BDS, The District Revenue Officer,3. Mr.P.K.Govindhan, The Revenue Divisional Officer,4. Ms.Yamuna, The Tahsildar, Coimbatore - 641 653. .. Respondents Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of CourtsAct, 1972 to punish the respondents for having committed contempt of the orderdated 28.06.2024 passed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jagadish For Respondent : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader for R1 to R4ORDERHeard Mr.C.Jagadish, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Special Government Pleader submitted that theorder of this Cou...


Jun 30 2025

Nasrin vs the Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Dep ...

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Nasrin ... Petitioner Vs.4. State rep. By its The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the petitioner's husband detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 15.03.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in proceedings C.No.31/G/IS/2025, quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioner's husband S.Faizal Rahuman, S/o. Shagul Hameed, aged 30 years before this Court and set the petitioner's husband at liberty from detention, now the petitioner's husband detained at Central Prison, Coimbatore.For Petitioner : Mr. W. Camyles Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.E. Raj Thilak, Additional ...


Jun 30 2025

Tata Capital Ltd vs Koda Purna Chander Rao

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Tata Capital Limited .. Applicant vs Kode Purna Chander Rao .. RespondentORDERAs early as on 02.04.2025 itself, this Court appointed an Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle. Till date, the vehicle has not been located. Even today, further extension is sought for by the learned counsel for the applicant. 2.In view of the fact that sufficient opportunities have been granted for the Advocate Commissioner to re-possess the vehicle, no further extension can be granted.ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.vga 3.Accordingly, this application is closed. Liberty is granted to the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner. 4.Once the vehicle is located and while considering the fresh application, this Court shall consider retaining the very same Advocate Commissioner since the applicant has already paid the initial remuneration to the Advocate Commissione...


Jun 30 2025

Thaslim Fathima vs the Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-30-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Thaslim Fathima ... Petitioner Vs.5. State rep. By its The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore District ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the petitioner's husband detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order, dated 15.03.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein made in proceedings C.No.30/G//IS/2025, quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioner's husband K. Zaheer Hussain, S/o. Kaja Hussain, aged 35 years before this Court and set the petitioner's husband at liberty from detention, now the petitioner's husband detained at Central Prison, Coimbatore.For Petitioner : Mr. W. Camyles Gandhi For Respondents : Mr.E. Raj Thilak, A...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial